Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-27 DOI:10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.150
Mostafa Omran Hussein, Lamis Ahmed Hussein
{"title":"Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters.","authors":"Mostafa Omran Hussein,&nbsp;Lamis Ahmed Hussein","doi":"10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to assess the influence of build orientations and density of support structures on the trueness of the 3D printed removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A maxillary Kennedy class III and mandibular class I casts were 3D scanned and used to design and produce two 3D virtual models of RPD frameworks. Using digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing, 47 RPD frameworks were fabricated at 3 different build orientations (100, 135 and 150-degree angles) and 2 support structure densities. All frameworks were scanned and 3D compared to the original virtual RPD models by metrology software to check 3D deviations quantitatively and qualitatively. The accuracy data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA for build orientation comparison and independent sample t-test for structure density comparison at (α = .05). Points study analysis targeting RPD components and representative color maps were also studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The build orientation of 135-degree angle of the maxillary frameworks showed the lowest deviation at the clasp arms of tooth 26 of the 135-degree angle group. The mandibular frameworks with 150-degree angle build orientation showed the least deviation at the rest on tooth 44 and the arm of the I-bar clasp of tooth 45. No significant difference was seen between different support structure densities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Build orientation had an influence on the accuracy of the frameworks, especially at a 135-degree angle of maxillary design and 150-degree of mandibular design. The difference in the support's density structure revealed no considerable effect on the accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/19/a4/jap-14-150.PMC9259348.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the influence of build orientations and density of support structures on the trueness of the 3D printed removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks.

Materials and methods: A maxillary Kennedy class III and mandibular class I casts were 3D scanned and used to design and produce two 3D virtual models of RPD frameworks. Using digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing, 47 RPD frameworks were fabricated at 3 different build orientations (100, 135 and 150-degree angles) and 2 support structure densities. All frameworks were scanned and 3D compared to the original virtual RPD models by metrology software to check 3D deviations quantitatively and qualitatively. The accuracy data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA for build orientation comparison and independent sample t-test for structure density comparison at (α = .05). Points study analysis targeting RPD components and representative color maps were also studied.

Results: The build orientation of 135-degree angle of the maxillary frameworks showed the lowest deviation at the clasp arms of tooth 26 of the 135-degree angle group. The mandibular frameworks with 150-degree angle build orientation showed the least deviation at the rest on tooth 44 and the arm of the I-bar clasp of tooth 45. No significant difference was seen between different support structure densities.

Conclusion: Build orientation had an influence on the accuracy of the frameworks, especially at a 135-degree angle of maxillary design and 150-degree of mandibular design. The difference in the support's density structure revealed no considerable effect on the accuracy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3D打印局部义齿框架的真实性:构建方向和支撑结构密度参数。
目的:研究3D打印可摘局部义齿(RPD)支架的构建方向和密度对支架正确率的影响。材料和方法:对上颌Kennedy III类和下颌骨I类铸型进行3D扫描,设计并制作两个RPD框架的3D虚拟模型。采用数字光处理(DLP) 3D打印技术,以3种不同的构建方向(100度、135度和150度角)和2种支撑结构密度制作了47个RPD框架。通过测量软件对所有框架进行扫描,并与原始虚拟RPD模型进行三维比较,定量和定性地检查三维偏差。精度数据采用单因素方差分析(single -way ANOVA)进行构建取向比较,结构密度比较采用独立样本t检验(α = 0.05)。并针对RPD成分和代表性色图进行了点研究分析。结果:上颌框架135度角的构建方位在135度角组中26号牙卡臂偏差最小。在第44号牙和第45号牙的i型卡环臂上,150度角的下颌框架偏差最小。不同支撑结构密度间无显著差异。结论:上颌设计角度为135度,下颌骨设计角度为150度时,构建方位对框架精度有影响。支座密度结构的差异对精度影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
期刊最新文献
A novel brief questionnaire using a face rating scale to assess dental anxiety and fear. Clinical performance of implant-assisted removable partial dentures using implant surveyed crowns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of cement type, luting protocol, and ceramic abutment material on the shade of cemented titanium-based lithium disilicate crowns and surrounding peri-implant soft tissue: a spectrophotometric analysis. Palatal vault configuration and its influence on intraoral scan time and accuracy in completely edentulous arches: a prospective clinical study. Recording maximal intercuspation and border positions of the mandible with intraoral scanner using the acquisition software's multi-occlusion function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1