Ka'imi A Sinclair, Cassandra Nikolaus, Lucas Gillespie, Celina M Garza, Waylon Pee Pahona, Jacquelyn Blaz, Dedra Buchwald
{"title":"Strong Men, Strong Communities: Revision of a Diabetes Prevention Intervention for American Indian and Alaska Native Men During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Ka'imi A Sinclair, Cassandra Nikolaus, Lucas Gillespie, Celina M Garza, Waylon Pee Pahona, Jacquelyn Blaz, Dedra Buchwald","doi":"10.5820/aian.2902.2022.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper describes the revision of the in-person Strong Men, Strong Communities (SMSC) study to a remote protocol and highlights key successes, challenges, and critical lessons learned applicable to remote trial implementation. The SMSC study is the first randomized controlled trial to exclusively recruit American Indian and Alaska Native men into a diabetes prevention intervention. The five-year randomized controlled trial was in its 42nd month with 99 subjects enrolled when the COVID-19 pandemic ceased all in-person research. The study protocol was revised to accommodate remote implementation which required multiple protocol and procedural changes, including the use of Facebook for national recruitment of participants; alteration of the informed consent process; use of REDCap for independent participant completion of informed consent; revised eligibility criteria; and use of Zoom to deliver intervention classes. The remote study protocol proved superior to the in-person protocol in terms of recruitment, retention, engagement in intervention classes, and efficiency of data collection. Challenges to participation and retention included competing demands of participant's jobs as essential workers and for some, the trauma of the losing a loved one(s) to COVID-19. Future studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of a remote protocol in the absence of a pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"85-103"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5820/aian.2902.2022.85","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper describes the revision of the in-person Strong Men, Strong Communities (SMSC) study to a remote protocol and highlights key successes, challenges, and critical lessons learned applicable to remote trial implementation. The SMSC study is the first randomized controlled trial to exclusively recruit American Indian and Alaska Native men into a diabetes prevention intervention. The five-year randomized controlled trial was in its 42nd month with 99 subjects enrolled when the COVID-19 pandemic ceased all in-person research. The study protocol was revised to accommodate remote implementation which required multiple protocol and procedural changes, including the use of Facebook for national recruitment of participants; alteration of the informed consent process; use of REDCap for independent participant completion of informed consent; revised eligibility criteria; and use of Zoom to deliver intervention classes. The remote study protocol proved superior to the in-person protocol in terms of recruitment, retention, engagement in intervention classes, and efficiency of data collection. Challenges to participation and retention included competing demands of participant's jobs as essential workers and for some, the trauma of the losing a loved one(s) to COVID-19. Future studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of a remote protocol in the absence of a pandemic.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.