Impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure.

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2022-07-06 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000122
Ralph Grauer, Michael A Gorin, Akshay Sood, Mohit Butaney, Phil Olson, Guillaume Farah, Renee Hanna Cole, Wooju Jeong, Firas Abdollah, Mani Menon
{"title":"Impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure.","authors":"Ralph Grauer,&nbsp;Michael A Gorin,&nbsp;Akshay Sood,&nbsp;Mohit Butaney,&nbsp;Phil Olson,&nbsp;Guillaume Farah,&nbsp;Renee Hanna Cole,&nbsp;Wooju Jeong,&nbsp;Firas Abdollah,&nbsp;Mani Menon","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of iterative changes in preoperative and postoperative biopsy techniques on the outcomes of men undergoing the precision prostatectomy procedure. Precision prostatectomy is a novel surgical treatment for prostate cancer that aims to maximally preserve erectogenic nerves via partial preservation of the prostate capsule.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>This study included 120 patients who consented to undergo prostate cancer treatment with the precision prostatectomy procedure. Patients were originally enrolled in one of two separate prospective protocols studying precision prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Preoperatively, 60 patients were screened with transrectal (TR) biopsy and 60 were screened by transperineal (TP) biopsy. Ultimately, 117 patients underwent precision prostatectomy. Of the 43 postoperative biopsies, 19 were TR; 17 were TP with ultrasound; and 7 were TP with microultrasound (mUS).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Preoperatively, we evaluated whether the transition to TP biopsy was associated with differences in postoperative treatment failure defined as a neoplasm-positive postoperative biopsy. Postoperative biopsies were compared with respect to their ability to sample the remnant tissue, specifically percentage of cores positive for prostate tissue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, 9/60 (15%) positive postoperative biopsies occurred in the TR group and 6/60 (10%) in the TP group; Kaplan-Meier survival estimates did not differ between groups (p=0.69 by log rank). Postoperatively, the numbers of cores positive for prostate tissue were 99/160 (62%), 63/107 (59%), and 36/39 (92%) in the TR biopsy, TP with ultrasound, and TP with mUS groups, respectively; this difference was statistically significant versus the rate in the TR and standard TP groups (p=0.0003 and 0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no significant improvement in patient screening, preoperatively-though limited by small sample size and relatively short follow-up. The incorporation of high-frequency mUS for postoperative biopsies improved the ability to sample the remnant tissue with a higher efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/25/da/bmjsit-2021-000122.PMC9260793.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of iterative changes in preoperative and postoperative biopsy techniques on the outcomes of men undergoing the precision prostatectomy procedure. Precision prostatectomy is a novel surgical treatment for prostate cancer that aims to maximally preserve erectogenic nerves via partial preservation of the prostate capsule.

Design: Retrospective.

Setting: Single tertiary care center.

Participants: This study included 120 patients who consented to undergo prostate cancer treatment with the precision prostatectomy procedure. Patients were originally enrolled in one of two separate prospective protocols studying precision prostatectomy.

Interventions: Preoperatively, 60 patients were screened with transrectal (TR) biopsy and 60 were screened by transperineal (TP) biopsy. Ultimately, 117 patients underwent precision prostatectomy. Of the 43 postoperative biopsies, 19 were TR; 17 were TP with ultrasound; and 7 were TP with microultrasound (mUS).

Main outcome measures: Preoperatively, we evaluated whether the transition to TP biopsy was associated with differences in postoperative treatment failure defined as a neoplasm-positive postoperative biopsy. Postoperative biopsies were compared with respect to their ability to sample the remnant tissue, specifically percentage of cores positive for prostate tissue.

Results: Preoperatively, 9/60 (15%) positive postoperative biopsies occurred in the TR group and 6/60 (10%) in the TP group; Kaplan-Meier survival estimates did not differ between groups (p=0.69 by log rank). Postoperatively, the numbers of cores positive for prostate tissue were 99/160 (62%), 63/107 (59%), and 36/39 (92%) in the TR biopsy, TP with ultrasound, and TP with mUS groups, respectively; this difference was statistically significant versus the rate in the TR and standard TP groups (p=0.0003 and 0.0002).

Conclusion: We found no significant improvement in patient screening, preoperatively-though limited by small sample size and relatively short follow-up. The incorporation of high-frequency mUS for postoperative biopsies improved the ability to sample the remnant tissue with a higher efficiency.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺活检技术对精准前列腺切除术结果的影响。
目的:评估术前和术后活检技术的反复变化对男性精密前列腺切除术结果的影响。精确前列腺切除术是一种新的前列腺癌手术治疗方法,旨在通过部分保存前列腺包膜来最大限度地保护勃起神经。设计:回顾性。环境:单一三级保健中心。参与者:本研究包括120名同意接受精确前列腺切除术治疗的前列腺癌患者。患者最初被纳入研究精确前列腺切除术的两个独立的前瞻性方案之一。干预措施:术前60例患者行经直肠活检(TR)筛查,60例行经会阴活检(TP)筛查。最终,117例患者接受了精准前列腺切除术。43例术后活检中,TR 19例;超声TP 17例;7例为超声TP (mUS)。主要结局指标:术前,我们评估了TP活检是否与术后治疗失败(肿瘤阳性术后活检)的差异有关。比较术后活检对残余组织取样的能力,特别是前列腺组织核阳性的百分比。结果:术前TR组术后活检阳性9/60 (15%),TP组术后活检阳性6/60 (10%);Kaplan-Meier生存估计在组间无差异(log rank p=0.69)。术后TR活检组、超声TP组、mUS组前列腺组织核阳性率分别为99/160(62%)、63/107(59%)、36/39 (92%);与TR组和标准TP组相比,这一差异具有统计学意义(p=0.0003和0.0002)。结论:我们发现术前患者筛查没有显著改善,尽管样本量小,随访时间相对较短。在术后活检中加入高频mUS提高了以更高效率对残余组织进行取样的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of adjuvant antibiotic hydrogel application on the primary stability of uncemented hip stems. Prospective randomized evaluation of the sustained impact of assistive artificial intelligence on anesthetists' ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia. Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. IDEAL evaluation for global surgery innovation. No frugal innovation without frugal evaluation: the Global IDEAL Sub-Framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1