Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study.

Francesca Collins, Kelly Gilmore, Kelsey A Petrie, Lyndsey S Benson
{"title":"Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study.","authors":"Francesca Collins,&nbsp;Kelly Gilmore,&nbsp;Kelsey A Petrie,&nbsp;Lyndsey S Benson","doi":"10.1186/s40834-022-00177-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) with few contraindications. Users, however, often encounter barriers to desired removal. IUD self-removal may mitigate these obstacles. We sought to develop a guide for IUD self-removal with the aim of increasing user control over the method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a two-phase mixed-methods qualitative and small pilot study with the aim of developing an IUD self-removal guide. We conducted an online content analysis of advice for IUD self-removal as well as interviews with expert key informants to develop an IUD self-removal guide. We next recruited IUD-users who had previously attempted self-removal to participate in focus group discussion and individual interviews to further refine the guide. In the second phase of the study, we piloted the guide among eight IUD-users seeking removal interested in attempting self-removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expert key informants agreed that IUD self-removal was safe and low risk. The primary components of successful IUD self-removal elicited were ability to feel and grasp the strings, a crouched down position, and multiple attempts. A preference for presenting IUD self-removal as safe was emphasized. In the second phase, participants in the clinical pilot suggested more information for non-palpable strings, but liked the style and information provided. One participant successfully removed their IUD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IUD-users reported satisfaction with our guide. In our small pilot, the majority were unable to remove their own IUD. A larger study is needed to assess acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy in increasing successful self-removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":10637,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247965/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00177-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) with few contraindications. Users, however, often encounter barriers to desired removal. IUD self-removal may mitigate these obstacles. We sought to develop a guide for IUD self-removal with the aim of increasing user control over the method.

Methods: This was a two-phase mixed-methods qualitative and small pilot study with the aim of developing an IUD self-removal guide. We conducted an online content analysis of advice for IUD self-removal as well as interviews with expert key informants to develop an IUD self-removal guide. We next recruited IUD-users who had previously attempted self-removal to participate in focus group discussion and individual interviews to further refine the guide. In the second phase of the study, we piloted the guide among eight IUD-users seeking removal interested in attempting self-removal.

Results: Expert key informants agreed that IUD self-removal was safe and low risk. The primary components of successful IUD self-removal elicited were ability to feel and grasp the strings, a crouched down position, and multiple attempts. A preference for presenting IUD self-removal as safe was emphasized. In the second phase, participants in the clinical pilot suggested more information for non-palpable strings, but liked the style and information provided. One participant successfully removed their IUD.

Conclusions: IUD-users reported satisfaction with our guide. In our small pilot, the majority were unable to remove their own IUD. A larger study is needed to assess acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy in increasing successful self-removal.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发宫内节育器自取出指南:一项混合方法定性和小型试点研究。
背景:宫内节育器(IUD)是一种高效的长效可逆避孕(LARC),禁忌症少。然而,用户在进行所需的删除时经常遇到障碍。宫内节育器的自行移除可能会减轻这些障碍。我们试图开发一个指南的宫内节育器自我清除的目的是增加用户控制的方法。方法:这是一项两期混合方法的定性小型试点研究,目的是开发一种宫内节育器自取出指南。我们对宫内节育器自行取出的建议进行了在线内容分析,并对专家关键线人进行了访谈,以制定宫内节育器自行取出指南。接下来,我们招募了之前曾尝试自行摘除的宫内节育器使用者参加焦点小组讨论和个人访谈,以进一步完善指南。在研究的第二阶段,我们在8名有兴趣自行摘除的宫内节育器使用者中试用了该指南。结果:专家重点举报人一致认为宫内节育器自拔出安全、低风险。成功取出宫内节育器的主要组成部分是感觉和抓住绳子的能力,蹲下的姿势,多次尝试。强调了将宫内节育器自行取出作为安全的首选方法。在第二阶段,临床试验的参与者建议为不可触摸的字符串提供更多信息,但他们喜欢所提供的风格和信息。一名参与者成功取出了宫内节育器。结论:宫内节育器使用者对我们的指南表示满意。在我们的小型试验中,大多数人无法取出自己的宫内节育器。需要一个更大的研究来评估可接受性、可行性和提高成功自我清除的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Unintended pregnancy and contraceptive use among women in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis Male characteristics and contraception in four districts of the central region, Ghana. Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey. Assessing the sustainability of two independent voucher-based family planning programs in Pakistan: a 24-months post-intervention evaluation. Emergency contraceptive use of Metronidazole among University female students in Dodoma region of Tanzania: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1