Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Diaphragm Thickness and Contractility in Individuals with Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain

Alieh Zendehdel Jadehkenari MSc , Hamid Reza Haghighatkhah MD , Javad Sarrafzadeh PhD , Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani PhD , Amir Massoud Arab PhD , Maryam Ziaeifar PhD
{"title":"Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Diaphragm Thickness and Contractility in Individuals with Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain","authors":"Alieh Zendehdel Jadehkenari MSc ,&nbsp;Hamid Reza Haghighatkhah MD ,&nbsp;Javad Sarrafzadeh PhD ,&nbsp;Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani PhD ,&nbsp;Amir Massoud Arab PhD ,&nbsp;Maryam Ziaeifar PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to determine within-day intra-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements of the right and left hemidiaphragm<span><span> thickness and contractility (quantified by percentage thickness change) in </span>supine position<span> during deep breathing in individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventeen volunteers (20-55 years of age) participated in this observational study. Bilateral diaphragm muscle thickness and contractility (percentage thickness change) were compared between 2 measurement sessions administered by a radiologist using B-mode real-time ultrasound (30 minutes apart). Intraclass correlation coefficient<span> (ICC [3, 3]) as well as the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and the coefficient of variation (CV) were used to determine the intra-rater reliability.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The right and left hemidiaphragm thickness showed good to excellent reliability at the end of deep inspiration (ICC, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.96; and ICC, 0. 93; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97, respectively) as well as at the end of deep expiration (ICC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96; ICC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77-0.97; SEM, 0.19; MDC, 0.54; and CV, 7.84%, respectively) and the percentage thickness change (ICC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54-0.94; and ICC, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study found that diagnostic ultrasound measurements of the right and left hemidiaphragm thickness and contractility in supine position during deep breathing in individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain was reliable. The SEM, MDC, and CV reported may allow for accurate interpretation of diaphragm assessment in a clinical research setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to determine within-day intra-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements of the right and left hemidiaphragm thickness and contractility (quantified by percentage thickness change) in supine position during deep breathing in individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain.

Methods

Seventeen volunteers (20-55 years of age) participated in this observational study. Bilateral diaphragm muscle thickness and contractility (percentage thickness change) were compared between 2 measurement sessions administered by a radiologist using B-mode real-time ultrasound (30 minutes apart). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [3, 3]) as well as the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and the coefficient of variation (CV) were used to determine the intra-rater reliability.

Results

The right and left hemidiaphragm thickness showed good to excellent reliability at the end of deep inspiration (ICC, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.96; and ICC, 0. 93; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97, respectively) as well as at the end of deep expiration (ICC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96; ICC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77-0.97; SEM, 0.19; MDC, 0.54; and CV, 7.84%, respectively) and the percentage thickness change (ICC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54-0.94; and ICC, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97, respectively).

Conclusion

This study found that diagnostic ultrasound measurements of the right and left hemidiaphragm thickness and contractility in supine position during deep breathing in individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain was reliable. The SEM, MDC, and CV reported may allow for accurate interpretation of diaphragm assessment in a clinical research setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非特异性慢性颈痛患者超声测量膈膜厚度和收缩性的内部可靠性
目的:本研究旨在确定非特异性慢性颈痛患者在仰卧位深呼吸时左右半膈厚度和收缩力(以厚度变化百分比量化)的超声测量在一天内的可靠性。方法17例志愿者(年龄20 ~ 55岁)参加观察性研究。由放射科医生使用b型实时超声(间隔30分钟)进行两次测量,比较双侧膈肌厚度和收缩力(厚度变化百分比)。采用类内相关系数(ICC[3,3])以及测量标准误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)和变异系数(CV)来确定组内信度。结果深吸气结束时左右半膈厚度呈良好至极好的信度(ICC, 0.90;95%置信区间[CI], 0.72-0.96;ICC为0。93;95% CI,分别为0.81-0.97)以及深度过期结束时(ICC, 0.91;95% ci, 0.75-0.96;国际刑事法庭,0.91;95% ci, 0.77-0.97;SEM, 0.19;争取民主变革运动,0.54;和CV分别为7.84%)和厚度变化百分比(ICC, 0.83;95% ci, 0.54-0.94;和ICC, 0.93;95% CI分别为0.82-0.97)。结论本研究发现,非特异性慢性颈痛患者仰卧位深呼吸时左右膈厚度和收缩力的诊断超声测量是可靠的。扫描电镜,MDC和CV报告可能允许在临床研究设置隔膜评估的准确解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Pain-Related Anxiety and Abdominal Muscle Thickness during Standing Postural Tasks in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain Analgesic Self-medication Among Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in a South African Chiropractic Teaching Clinic: A Cross-sectional Study Development of a Headache Diary and Assessment of Tension-Type Headache Diagnostic Criteria and Oral Behaviors, Joint Range of Motion, and Tenderness to Palpation: An Observational Study Editorial board Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1