Editor's introduction to this issue (G&I 20:2, 2022).

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Genomics and Informatics Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-30 DOI:10.5808/gi.20.2.e1
Taesung Park
{"title":"Editor's introduction to this issue (G&I 20:2, 2022).","authors":"Taesung Park","doi":"10.5808/gi.20.2.e1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2022 Korea Genome Organization This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In this issue, there are seven original articles and one publication in the category of clinical genomics. In this editorial, I would like to focus on two original articles about genome-wide association studies (GWAS). There have been great successes in large-scale GWAS to identify novel single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with traits of interest. By combining independent, large-scale GWAS, meta-analyses have revealed additional SNPs. These SNPs have now been utilized for Mendelian randomization analyses for causal inference. There continue to be challenging methodological issues in GWAS, such as the analysis of longitudinal genetic data, gene-gene interactions, and gene-environment interactions. Dr. Wonil Chung (Soongsil University, Korea), and his collaborators considered a Bayesian mixed model for longitudinal genetic data. In their earlier work, they demonstrated that their Bayesian method showed a higher statistical power than cross-sectional analysis for detecting SNP-time interactions. Through an analysis of Korea Association Resource (KARE) data for various longitudinal obesity traits, they demonstrated how to apply their Bayesian method in a more effective way. They conducted a two-stage analysis. In the first stage, they performed GWAS analyses of cross-sectional traits and applied a meta-analysis to identify candidate SNPs. In the second stage, they applied the Bayesian method to a subset of SNPs selected in the first stage. The main objective of the Bayesian method was to discover SNPs associated with traits of interest and SNP–time interactions. The application of their Bayesian method to KARE data successfully identified several novel SNPs associated with longitudinal obesity-related traits and significant SNP-time interactions. Dr. Mira Park (Eulji University, Korea) and her collaborators proposed an entropy-based gene-gene interaction analysis. In genetic association studies, using entropy-based mutual information is advantageous in that it does not depend on parametrization. For binary traits, both entropy and conditional entropy can be easily derived. For quantitative traits, however, these values cannot easily be obtained because quantitative traits require an exact evaluation of entropy by estimating the probability density function. Dr. Park and her collaborators proposed a method of combining the kernel density estimation and the entropy estimation with the probability density function. Through extensive simulation studies, they showed that the proposed method performed better or comparably well in detecting gene-gene interactions compared to existing methods, such as multifactor dimensionality reduction. New research topics have continued to emerge in GWAS. For example, polygenic risk scores have been popularly used in building prediction models using SNPs. I believe that the Bayesian method of Dr. Chung can be easily extended to estimate more accurate polygenic risk scores. Furthermore, Dr. Park’s work on gene-gene interactions can also be utilized in deriving polygenic risk scores that have both marginal genetic effects and interaction effects. Editor’s introduction to this issue (G&I 20:2, 2022)","PeriodicalId":36591,"journal":{"name":"Genomics and Informatics","volume":"20 2","pages":"e15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genomics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5808/gi.20.2.e1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

2022 Korea Genome Organization This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In this issue, there are seven original articles and one publication in the category of clinical genomics. In this editorial, I would like to focus on two original articles about genome-wide association studies (GWAS). There have been great successes in large-scale GWAS to identify novel single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with traits of interest. By combining independent, large-scale GWAS, meta-analyses have revealed additional SNPs. These SNPs have now been utilized for Mendelian randomization analyses for causal inference. There continue to be challenging methodological issues in GWAS, such as the analysis of longitudinal genetic data, gene-gene interactions, and gene-environment interactions. Dr. Wonil Chung (Soongsil University, Korea), and his collaborators considered a Bayesian mixed model for longitudinal genetic data. In their earlier work, they demonstrated that their Bayesian method showed a higher statistical power than cross-sectional analysis for detecting SNP-time interactions. Through an analysis of Korea Association Resource (KARE) data for various longitudinal obesity traits, they demonstrated how to apply their Bayesian method in a more effective way. They conducted a two-stage analysis. In the first stage, they performed GWAS analyses of cross-sectional traits and applied a meta-analysis to identify candidate SNPs. In the second stage, they applied the Bayesian method to a subset of SNPs selected in the first stage. The main objective of the Bayesian method was to discover SNPs associated with traits of interest and SNP–time interactions. The application of their Bayesian method to KARE data successfully identified several novel SNPs associated with longitudinal obesity-related traits and significant SNP-time interactions. Dr. Mira Park (Eulji University, Korea) and her collaborators proposed an entropy-based gene-gene interaction analysis. In genetic association studies, using entropy-based mutual information is advantageous in that it does not depend on parametrization. For binary traits, both entropy and conditional entropy can be easily derived. For quantitative traits, however, these values cannot easily be obtained because quantitative traits require an exact evaluation of entropy by estimating the probability density function. Dr. Park and her collaborators proposed a method of combining the kernel density estimation and the entropy estimation with the probability density function. Through extensive simulation studies, they showed that the proposed method performed better or comparably well in detecting gene-gene interactions compared to existing methods, such as multifactor dimensionality reduction. New research topics have continued to emerge in GWAS. For example, polygenic risk scores have been popularly used in building prediction models using SNPs. I believe that the Bayesian method of Dr. Chung can be easily extended to estimate more accurate polygenic risk scores. Furthermore, Dr. Park’s work on gene-gene interactions can also be utilized in deriving polygenic risk scores that have both marginal genetic effects and interaction effects. Editor’s introduction to this issue (G&I 20:2, 2022)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编者对本期的介绍(G&I 20:2, 2022)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genomics and Informatics
Genomics and Informatics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gut metagenomic analysis of gastric cancer patients reveals Akkermansia, Gammaproteobacteria, and Veillonella microbiota as potential non-invasive biomarkers COVID-19 progression towards ARDS: a genome wide study reveals host factors underlying critical COVID-19. Bioinformatic analyses reveal the prognostic significance and potential role of ankyrin 3 (ANK3) in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma. Comparison of digital PCR platforms using the molecular marker. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies distinct transcriptomic signatures between PMA/ionomycin- and αCD3/αCD28-activated primary human T cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1