Predictors of Successful Memory Aging in Older Mexican Adults.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Behavioural Neurology Pub Date : 2022-06-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/9045290
Rosa Estela García-Chanes, Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo, Teresa Álvarez-Cisneros, Paloma Roa-Rojas
{"title":"Predictors of Successful Memory Aging in Older Mexican Adults.","authors":"Rosa Estela García-Chanes,&nbsp;Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo,&nbsp;Teresa Álvarez-Cisneros,&nbsp;Paloma Roa-Rojas","doi":"10.1155/2022/9045290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research suggests a significant association between increasing age and memory impairments. Nevertheless, for some individuals, memory performance stays within or above the normative values of younger subjects. This is known as successful memory aging and is associated with specific neurophysiological features and psychological and lifestyle-related variables. To date, little is known about the association between successful memory aging and intrinsic capacity (IC) defined as \"the composite of all the physical and mental (including psychosocial) capacities that an individual can draw on at any point in time\" and resilience. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine if longitudinal associations between IC and successful memory aging and resilience exist and to find differences in cognitive performance between Mexican older adults with successful memory aging, older adults with average memory, and older adults with memory impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal data from 590 individuals from the third wave (2012) and the Mex-Cog subsample (2016) of the Mexican Health and Aging Study was analysed. Subjects were classified into 3 groups: (1) older adults with successful memory aging (SUMA), (2) older adults with average memory (AVMA), and (3) older adults with memory impairment (IMA). Cognitive domains of orientation, language, attention, constructional praxis, and executive function were evaluated. IC and resilience were measured using items from the MHAS battery. Analysis of variance and multinomial logistic regressions were used to find differences in IC and resilience across the memory aging groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ANOVAs showed significant differences across the three cognitive performance groups in all cognitive domains. Multinomial logistic regression analyses revealed that respondents with higher scores in the psychological and cognitive domains of IC at baseline were more likely to have successful memory aging in the subsequent wave of the study. More resilient subjects in 2012 were not more likely to become a SUMA in 2016. However, this could be a result of the way resilience was measured.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our main findings suggest that intrinsic capacity could be used as a predictor of successful memory aging specifically in the psychological and the cognitive domains. More longitudinal studies are needed to further examine these associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50733,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9252847/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9045290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Research suggests a significant association between increasing age and memory impairments. Nevertheless, for some individuals, memory performance stays within or above the normative values of younger subjects. This is known as successful memory aging and is associated with specific neurophysiological features and psychological and lifestyle-related variables. To date, little is known about the association between successful memory aging and intrinsic capacity (IC) defined as "the composite of all the physical and mental (including psychosocial) capacities that an individual can draw on at any point in time" and resilience. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine if longitudinal associations between IC and successful memory aging and resilience exist and to find differences in cognitive performance between Mexican older adults with successful memory aging, older adults with average memory, and older adults with memory impairment.

Methods: Longitudinal data from 590 individuals from the third wave (2012) and the Mex-Cog subsample (2016) of the Mexican Health and Aging Study was analysed. Subjects were classified into 3 groups: (1) older adults with successful memory aging (SUMA), (2) older adults with average memory (AVMA), and (3) older adults with memory impairment (IMA). Cognitive domains of orientation, language, attention, constructional praxis, and executive function were evaluated. IC and resilience were measured using items from the MHAS battery. Analysis of variance and multinomial logistic regressions were used to find differences in IC and resilience across the memory aging groups.

Results: ANOVAs showed significant differences across the three cognitive performance groups in all cognitive domains. Multinomial logistic regression analyses revealed that respondents with higher scores in the psychological and cognitive domains of IC at baseline were more likely to have successful memory aging in the subsequent wave of the study. More resilient subjects in 2012 were not more likely to become a SUMA in 2016. However, this could be a result of the way resilience was measured.

Conclusion: Our main findings suggest that intrinsic capacity could be used as a predictor of successful memory aging specifically in the psychological and the cognitive domains. More longitudinal studies are needed to further examine these associations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥老年人成功记忆老化的预测因素。
背景:研究表明,年龄增长与记忆障碍之间存在显著关联。然而,对于一些人来说,记忆表现保持在或高于年轻受试者的规范值。这被称为成功的记忆老化,与特定的神经生理特征、心理和生活方式相关的变量有关。迄今为止,人们对成功的记忆老化与内在能力(IC)之间的关系知之甚少。内在能力被定义为“个人在任何时间点都可以利用的所有生理和心理(包括心理社会)能力的总和”和复原力。因此,本研究的目的是确定IC与成功记忆老化和恢复力之间是否存在纵向关联,并发现成功记忆老化的墨西哥老年人、平均记忆的老年人和有记忆障碍的老年人在认知表现上的差异。方法:对来自墨西哥健康与老龄化研究第三波(2012年)和Mex-Cog子样本(2016年)的590名个体的纵向数据进行分析。研究对象分为3组:(1)成功记忆老化老年人(SUMA)、(2)平均记忆老年人(AVMA)和(3)记忆障碍老年人(IMA)。认知领域的取向,语言,注意,结构实践和执行功能进行了评估。IC和弹性测量使用的项目从MHAS电池。采用方差分析和多项逻辑回归分析发现记忆老化组之间IC和弹性的差异。结果:方差分析显示三个认知表现组在所有认知领域存在显著差异。多项逻辑回归分析表明,在IC的心理和认知领域得分较高的被调查者更有可能在随后的研究浪潮中成功实现记忆老化。2012年更有弹性的科目在2016年不太可能成为SUMA。然而,这可能是衡量弹性的方式造成的。结论:我们的主要研究结果表明,内在能力可以作为成功记忆老化的预测因子,特别是在心理和认知领域。需要更多的纵向研究来进一步检验这些关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Neurology
Behavioural Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Neurology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and clinical studies based on various diseases and syndromes in behavioural neurology. The aim of the journal is to provide a platform for researchers and clinicians working in various fields of neurology including cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology and neuropsychiatry. Topics of interest include: ADHD Aphasia Autism Alzheimer’s Disease Behavioural Disorders Dementia Epilepsy Multiple Sclerosis Parkinson’s Disease Psychosis Stroke Traumatic brain injury.
期刊最新文献
Quercetin Attenuates Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis in Brain Tissue of APP/PS1 Double Transgenic AD Mice by Regulating Keap1/Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway to Improve Cognitive Impairment. Optogenetics Neuromodulation of the Nose. Multimodal Brain Tumor Classification Using Convolutional Tumnet Architecture Burnout and Life Satisfaction among Healthcare Workers Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic (Silesia, Poland) Identification of Potential Clusters of Signs and Symptoms to Prioritize Patients’ Eligibility for AADCd Screening by 3-OMD Testing: An Italian Delphi Consensus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1