Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants.

IF 2.8 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2022-10-25 DOI:10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4
Myoung-Ju Kim, Jun Young Jeong, Jaeyoung Ryu, Seunggon Jung, Hong-Ju Park, Hee-Kyun Oh, Min-Suk Kook
{"title":"Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants.","authors":"Myoung-Ju Kim,&nbsp;Jun Young Jeong,&nbsp;Jaeyoung Ryu,&nbsp;Seunggon Jung,&nbsp;Hong-Ju Park,&nbsp;Hee-Kyun Oh,&nbsp;Min-Suk Kook","doi":"10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently developed imaging techniques, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CAD/CAM technology, have facilitated reliable implant planning and implant surgical guide production by 3D printing. This study compared the accuracy of implant-guided surgery using the R2GATE<sup>®</sup> program with CBCT before and after surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study included patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Chonnam National University Hospital from September 2021 to March 2022. Twenty-four implants were placed in eleven patients. Using R2GATE<sup>®</sup> Windows (Megagen implant, Daegu, Korea) software, implant placement was planned. The difference was measured by the CBCT before and after surgery. The cervical and apical distance and angular deviation of the implants were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three-dimensional linear distance difference between the planned implant and the placed implant was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm at the cervical and 1.13 ± 0.36 mm at the apical. The difference in angle deviation between the planned implant and the placed implant was 3.42 ± 2.12°. Among the variables affecting the accuracy of implant placement, a statistically significant difference was found when using a tissue-supported implant guide, implant diameter and implant length.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these results, using the R2GATE<sup>®</sup> program is useful to use an implant digital surgical guide, and it will be used in various clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596667/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Recently developed imaging techniques, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CAD/CAM technology, have facilitated reliable implant planning and implant surgical guide production by 3D printing. This study compared the accuracy of implant-guided surgery using the R2GATE® program with CBCT before and after surgery.

Patients and methods: The study included patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Chonnam National University Hospital from September 2021 to March 2022. Twenty-four implants were placed in eleven patients. Using R2GATE® Windows (Megagen implant, Daegu, Korea) software, implant placement was planned. The difference was measured by the CBCT before and after surgery. The cervical and apical distance and angular deviation of the implants were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analyses.

Results: The three-dimensional linear distance difference between the planned implant and the placed implant was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm at the cervical and 1.13 ± 0.36 mm at the apical. The difference in angle deviation between the planned implant and the placed implant was 3.42 ± 2.12°. Among the variables affecting the accuracy of implant placement, a statistically significant difference was found when using a tissue-supported implant guide, implant diameter and implant length.

Conclusion: Based on these results, using the R2GATE® program is useful to use an implant digital surgical guide, and it will be used in various clinic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙种植体数字化手术指南的准确性。
背景:最近发展的成像技术,如锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和CAD/CAM技术,通过3D打印促进了可靠的种植体计划和种植体手术指南的生产。本研究比较了术前和术后使用R2GATE®程序与CBCT的种植引导手术的准确性。患者和方法:研究纳入了2021年9月至2022年3月在全南大学医院口腔颌面外科就诊的患者。在11例患者中放置了24个植入物。使用R2GATE®Windows (Megagen implant,大邱,韩国)软件,计划种植体放置。手术前后通过CBCT测量差异。测量种植体的颈椎和根尖距离和角度偏差。统计分析采用独立t检验、Pearson相关和多元回归分析。结果:计划种植体与放置种植体的三维直线距离差为:颈部0.97±0.37 mm,根尖1.13±0.36 mm。计划种植体与放置种植体的角度偏差差为3.42±2.12°。在影响种植体放置准确性的变量中,使用组织支撑种植体引导、种植体直径和种植体长度的差异有统计学意义。结论:基于以上结果,R2GATE®程序可用于种植体数字化手术指南的使用,可用于各种临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 from a conditioned medium of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells promotes bone regeneration by enhancing macrophage phenotype polarization. Effects of impacted mandibular third molar surgery performed with piezosurgery and conventional systems on postoperative sequelae and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. Postoperative discomfort following inverted periosteal pedicle graft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft for treating gingival recession RT1 & RT2: a randomized clinical trial. Prognostic factors for functional recovery after lingual nerve reconstruction using an artificial nerve conduit. Longitudinal Methods in Orthognathic Surgery Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1