A randomized, double-blind, clinical pilot trial of adjunct ketone supplement compared to placebo for treating posttraumatic stress disorder.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Annals of Clinical Psychiatry Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.12788/acp.0088
Nagy A Youssef, Angelia Maleah Holland-Winkler, Phung Phung, Jennifer L Waller, Sonali Ponkshe
{"title":"A randomized, double-blind, clinical pilot trial of adjunct ketone supplement compared to placebo for treating posttraumatic stress disorder.","authors":"Nagy A Youssef,&nbsp;Angelia Maleah Holland-Winkler,&nbsp;Phung Phung,&nbsp;Jennifer L Waller,&nbsp;Sonali Ponkshe","doi":"10.12788/acp.0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite some evidence of the helpful role of ketones in some neuropsychiatric disorders, there are no clinical trials that examine these agents for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Our aim was to investigate whether ketone salt supplementation can improve PTSD symptoms in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 21 participants were recruited and randomized to placebo or ketone supplement. Each dose of ketone supplement included 7 g of ketones in the form of beta-hydroxybutyrate for a total of 14 g/d. Data were collected through questionnaires to assess PTSD symptoms. We used Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and 2-sample t tests for continuous variables to examine differences in baseline values between treatment groups. Mixed models were employed to examine changes over time between groups on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in PCL-5 medians between the ketone and control groups at pretest (P = 1.0000) or post-test (P = .6020). The ketone group had a statistically significant decrease in median PCL-5 scores from 58.5 (pretest) to 54.0 (posttest; P = .0003) but the control group did not change (34 at pretest and at posttest; P = .4418).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ketone group showed a significant decrease in PCL-5 score at posttest compared with pretest that was not seen in the control group, although these changes were not statistically significant between groups. The small sample size limited the study and likely contributed to the lack of significance. Larger trials are needed to more definitively examine these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50770,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/acp.0088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Despite some evidence of the helpful role of ketones in some neuropsychiatric disorders, there are no clinical trials that examine these agents for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Our aim was to investigate whether ketone salt supplementation can improve PTSD symptoms in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Methods: A total of 21 participants were recruited and randomized to placebo or ketone supplement. Each dose of ketone supplement included 7 g of ketones in the form of beta-hydroxybutyrate for a total of 14 g/d. Data were collected through questionnaires to assess PTSD symptoms. We used Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and 2-sample t tests for continuous variables to examine differences in baseline values between treatment groups. Mixed models were employed to examine changes over time between groups on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5).

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in PCL-5 medians between the ketone and control groups at pretest (P = 1.0000) or post-test (P = .6020). The ketone group had a statistically significant decrease in median PCL-5 scores from 58.5 (pretest) to 54.0 (posttest; P = .0003) but the control group did not change (34 at pretest and at posttest; P = .4418).

Conclusions: The ketone group showed a significant decrease in PCL-5 score at posttest compared with pretest that was not seen in the control group, although these changes were not statistically significant between groups. The small sample size limited the study and likely contributed to the lack of significance. Larger trials are needed to more definitively examine these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机,双盲,辅助酮补充剂与安慰剂治疗创伤后应激障碍的临床试验。
背景:尽管有一些证据表明酮类药物在一些神经精神疾病中起着有益的作用,但还没有临床试验检验这些药物治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。我们的目的是在一项随机、安慰剂对照试验中研究补充酮盐是否能改善PTSD症状。方法:共招募21名参与者,随机分为安慰剂组和酮组。每剂量的酮类补充剂包括7 g β -羟基丁酸形式的酮类,共计14 g/d。通过问卷收集数据以评估PTSD症状。我们使用分类变量的Fisher精确检验和连续变量的2样本t检验来检验治疗组之间基线值的差异。采用混合模型来检查DSM-5 (PCL-5) PTSD检查表各组间随时间的变化。结果:酮组与对照组PCL-5中位数测前(P = 1.0000)、测后(P = 0.6020)差异均无统计学意义。酮组PCL-5中位评分从58.5(前测)降至54.0(后测;P = .0003),而对照组没有变化(前测和后测各34例;P = .4418)。结论:酮组患者后测时PCL-5评分较前测时明显下降,对照组未见此变化,但组间差异无统计学意义。小样本量限制了研究,可能导致缺乏意义。需要更大规模的试验来更明确地检验这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ANNALS publishes up-to-date information regarding the diagnosis and /or treatment of persons with mental disorders. Preferred manuscripts are those that report the results of controlled clinical trials, timely and thorough evidence-based reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports that present new appraisals of pertinent clinical topics.
期刊最新文献
Posttraumatic stress disorder comorbidity in patients undergoing ECT for major depressive disorder. Clinical characteristics of trichotillomania. Development of a mobile monitoring program for anxiety and depression in pregnancy and evaluation of 3-month results. Problematic internet use and suicidal behavior in adolescents: A review. Protest behaviors among patients placed in seclusion in a psychiatric emergency service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1