Emotion-related impulsivity and suicidal ideation: Towards a more specific model

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1111/bjc.12383
Sarah Anvar, Benjamin A. Swerdlow, David Jobes, Kiara R. Timpano, Abby Adler Mandel, Evan Kleiman, Thomas Joiner, Sheri L. Johnson
{"title":"Emotion-related impulsivity and suicidal ideation: Towards a more specific model","authors":"Sarah Anvar,&nbsp;Benjamin A. Swerdlow,&nbsp;David Jobes,&nbsp;Kiara R. Timpano,&nbsp;Abby Adler Mandel,&nbsp;Evan Kleiman,&nbsp;Thomas Joiner,&nbsp;Sheri L. Johnson","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Suicidal ideation is a pervasive and painful experience that varies considerably in its phenomenology. Here, we consider how one key risk variable might inform our understanding of variation in suicidal ideation: emotion-related impulsivity, the trait-like tendency towards unconstrained speech, behaviour, and cognition in the face of intense emotions. We hypothesized that emotion-related impulsivity would be tied to specific features, including severity, perceived lack of controllability, more rapidly fluctuating course, higher scores on a measure of acute suicidal affective disturbance, and more emotional and cognitive disturbance as antecedents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We recruited two samples of adults (<i>N</i>s = 421, 221) through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), with oversampling of those with suicidal ideation. Both samples completed psychometrically sound self-report measures online to assess emotion- and non-emotion-related dimensions of impulsivity and characteristics of suicidal ideation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>One form of emotion-related impulsivity related to the severity, uncontrollability, dynamic course, and affective and cognitive precursors of ideation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite limitations of the cross-sectional design and self-report measures, the current findings highlight the importance of specificity in considering key dimensions of impulsivity and suicidal ideation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"61 4","pages":"1219-1235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjc.12383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Suicidal ideation is a pervasive and painful experience that varies considerably in its phenomenology. Here, we consider how one key risk variable might inform our understanding of variation in suicidal ideation: emotion-related impulsivity, the trait-like tendency towards unconstrained speech, behaviour, and cognition in the face of intense emotions. We hypothesized that emotion-related impulsivity would be tied to specific features, including severity, perceived lack of controllability, more rapidly fluctuating course, higher scores on a measure of acute suicidal affective disturbance, and more emotional and cognitive disturbance as antecedents.

Methods

We recruited two samples of adults (Ns = 421, 221) through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), with oversampling of those with suicidal ideation. Both samples completed psychometrically sound self-report measures online to assess emotion- and non-emotion-related dimensions of impulsivity and characteristics of suicidal ideation.

Results

One form of emotion-related impulsivity related to the severity, uncontrollability, dynamic course, and affective and cognitive precursors of ideation.

Conclusions

Despite limitations of the cross-sectional design and self-report measures, the current findings highlight the importance of specificity in considering key dimensions of impulsivity and suicidal ideation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪相关的冲动和自杀意念:走向一个更具体的模型。
目的:自杀意念是一种普遍而痛苦的体验,其现象学差异很大。在这里,我们考虑了一个关键的风险变量如何影响我们对自杀意念变化的理解:情绪相关的冲动,面对强烈情绪时不受约束的言语、行为和认知的特质倾向。我们假设,与情绪相关的冲动与特定特征有关,包括严重程度、感知缺乏控制性、波动更快、急性自杀情感障碍评分更高,以及更多的情绪和认知障碍作为前因。方法:我们通过Amazon Mechanical Turk(MTurk)招募了两个成年人样本(Ns=42121),并对有自杀意念的人进行了过采样。两个样本都在网上完成了心理测量学上健全的自我报告测量,以评估冲动的情绪和非情绪相关维度以及自杀意念的特征。结果:一种形式的情绪相关冲动与意念的严重性、不可控性、动态过程以及情感和认知前兆有关。结论:尽管横断面设计和自我报告措施存在局限性,但目前的研究结果强调了在考虑冲动和自杀意念的关键维度时特异性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The role of impulsivity in the association between rumination and cannabis-related problems among trauma-exposed cannabis users. Editorial acknowledgement Negative interpretation bias and repetitive negative thinking as mechanisms in the association between insomnia and depression in young adults. Correlates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among bisexual+, gay/lesbian, and heterosexual young adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1