Influence of anesthesia type on post-reperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation: a single-center retrospective study.

Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-08 DOI:10.17085/apm.21104
Hye-Yeon Cho, Ho-Jin Lee, Won Ho Kim, Hyung-Chul Lee, Chul-Woo Jung, Suk Kyun Hong, Seong-Mi Yang
{"title":"Influence of anesthesia type on post-reperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation: a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Hye-Yeon Cho,&nbsp;Ho-Jin Lee,&nbsp;Won Ho Kim,&nbsp;Hyung-Chul Lee,&nbsp;Chul-Woo Jung,&nbsp;Suk Kyun Hong,&nbsp;Seong-Mi Yang","doi":"10.17085/apm.21104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) results in sudden hemodynamic instability following graft reperfusion. Although PRS is known to influence outcomes following liver transplantation, little is known regarding the effects of anesthetics on PRS. This study investigated the association between the type of anesthetic agent and PRS in liver transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent liver transplantation between June 2016 and December 2019. Patients were divided into sevoflurane and propofol groups according to the anesthetic agent used. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to investigate the association between PRS identified based on blood pressure recordings and the type of anesthesia. Associations between the anesthetic agent and the duration of hypotension as well as early postoperative outcomes were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analyzed for 398 patients, 304 (76.4%) and 94 (23.6%) of whom were anesthetized with propofol and sevoflurane, respectively. PRS developed in 40.7% of the 398 patients. Following stabilized IPTW analysis, the association with PRS was lower in the sevoflurane group than in the propofol group (odds ratio, 0.47; P = 0.018). However, there was no association between the type of anesthetic used and early postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The association of PRS was lower in the sevoflurane group than in the propofol group. However, there was no association between the type of anesthetic and the early postoperative outcomes. Further studies are required to determine the optimal anesthetic for liver transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":" ","pages":"304-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/f9/apm-21104.PMC9346196.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.21104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) results in sudden hemodynamic instability following graft reperfusion. Although PRS is known to influence outcomes following liver transplantation, little is known regarding the effects of anesthetics on PRS. This study investigated the association between the type of anesthetic agent and PRS in liver transplantation.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent liver transplantation between June 2016 and December 2019. Patients were divided into sevoflurane and propofol groups according to the anesthetic agent used. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to investigate the association between PRS identified based on blood pressure recordings and the type of anesthesia. Associations between the anesthetic agent and the duration of hypotension as well as early postoperative outcomes were also investigated.

Results: Data were analyzed for 398 patients, 304 (76.4%) and 94 (23.6%) of whom were anesthetized with propofol and sevoflurane, respectively. PRS developed in 40.7% of the 398 patients. Following stabilized IPTW analysis, the association with PRS was lower in the sevoflurane group than in the propofol group (odds ratio, 0.47; P = 0.018). However, there was no association between the type of anesthetic used and early postoperative outcomes.

Conclusions: The association of PRS was lower in the sevoflurane group than in the propofol group. However, there was no association between the type of anesthetic and the early postoperative outcomes. Further studies are required to determine the optimal anesthetic for liver transplantation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉类型对肝移植术后再灌注综合征影响的单中心回顾性研究
背景:再灌注后综合征(PRS)导致移植物再灌注后突然的血流动力学不稳定。虽然已知PRS会影响肝移植后的预后,但麻醉剂对PRS的影响知之甚少。本研究探讨了肝移植中麻醉药物类型与PRS的关系。方法:该单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2016年6月至2019年12月期间接受肝移植的患者。根据麻醉药物的不同分为七氟醚组和异丙酚组。采用稳定治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)分析,探讨根据血压记录确定的PRS与麻醉类型之间的关系。还研究了麻醉剂与低血压持续时间以及术后早期结果之间的关系。结果:对398例患者进行数据分析,其中异丙酚麻醉304例(76.4%),七氟醚麻醉94例(23.6%)。398例患者中有40.7%出现PRS。经稳定IPTW分析,七氟醚组与PRS的相关性低于异丙酚组(优势比,0.47;P = 0.018)。然而,使用的麻醉药类型与早期术后结果之间没有关联。结论:七氟醚组PRS的相关性低于异丙酚组。然而,麻醉类型与早期术后结果之间没有关联。需要进一步的研究来确定肝移植的最佳麻醉剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anesthetic neurotoxicity in the developing brain: an update on theinsights and implications for fetal surgery Extubation and removal of supraglottic airway devices in pediatric anesthesia Relationship between intraoperative requirement for anesthetics and postoperative analgesic consumption in laparoscopic colectomy: a randomized controlled double-blinded study Opioid-free anesthesia using a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial How does circadian rhythm affect postoperative pain after pediatric acute appendicitis surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1