Spatial Distribution and Associated Factors of Institutional Delivery among Reproductive-Age Women in Ethiopia: The Case of Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrics and Gynecology International Pub Date : 2022-06-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/4480568
Daniel Sisay, Helen Ali Ewune, Temesgen Muche, Wondwosen Molla
{"title":"Spatial Distribution and Associated Factors of Institutional Delivery among Reproductive-Age Women in Ethiopia: The Case of Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey.","authors":"Daniel Sisay, Helen Ali Ewune, Temesgen Muche, Wondwosen Molla","doi":"10.1155/2022/4480568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal mortality is unacceptably high. About 295,000 women died during and following pregnancy and childbirth in 2017. The vast majority of these deaths (94%) occurred in low-resource settings, and most could have been prevented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research is based on a cross-sectional study using 2016 EDHS data. The analysis included 7,590 women who had given birth in the five years prior to the survey. Clusters with high and low hot spots with institutional delivery were found using SatScan spatial statistical analysis. A multilevel multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression was utilized to discover characteristics associated with institutional delivery.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>In this study, 33.25% of women who gave birth in the last 5 years preceding the survey delivered their babies at health institutions. The finding also indicated that the spatial distribution of institutional delivery was nonrandom in the country. Variables achieving statically significant association with utilization of institutional delivery were as follows: at the individual level, richness (AOR = 2.18, 95%CI: 1.39-3.41), higher education (AOR = 3.89, 95%CI: 1.51-10.01), a number of antenatal care visits of four and above (AOR = 6.57, 95%CI: 4.83-8.94), and parity of more than two children (AOR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.34-0.68); at the community level, higher education (AOR = 1.70, 95%CI: 1.22-2.36) and urban residence (AOR = 5.30, 95%CI: 3.10-9.06) were variables that had achieved statically significant association for utilization of institutional delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified a spatial cluster of institutional delivery with the Somali and Afar region having low utilization rates and Addis Ababa and Tigray regions having the highest utilization rates. The significant individual factors associated with institution delivery were woman antenatal care visits, household wealth index, maternal education, and parity, and the significant community ones were region, place of residence, and educational status. Therefore, to maximize health facility delivery in Ethiopia, the predictors of institutional delivery identified in this study should be given more attention by governmental and nongovernmental stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9252845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4480568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maternal mortality is unacceptably high. About 295,000 women died during and following pregnancy and childbirth in 2017. The vast majority of these deaths (94%) occurred in low-resource settings, and most could have been prevented.

Methods: This research is based on a cross-sectional study using 2016 EDHS data. The analysis included 7,590 women who had given birth in the five years prior to the survey. Clusters with high and low hot spots with institutional delivery were found using SatScan spatial statistical analysis. A multilevel multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression was utilized to discover characteristics associated with institutional delivery.

Result: In this study, 33.25% of women who gave birth in the last 5 years preceding the survey delivered their babies at health institutions. The finding also indicated that the spatial distribution of institutional delivery was nonrandom in the country. Variables achieving statically significant association with utilization of institutional delivery were as follows: at the individual level, richness (AOR = 2.18, 95%CI: 1.39-3.41), higher education (AOR = 3.89, 95%CI: 1.51-10.01), a number of antenatal care visits of four and above (AOR = 6.57, 95%CI: 4.83-8.94), and parity of more than two children (AOR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.34-0.68); at the community level, higher education (AOR = 1.70, 95%CI: 1.22-2.36) and urban residence (AOR = 5.30, 95%CI: 3.10-9.06) were variables that had achieved statically significant association for utilization of institutional delivery.

Conclusions: This study identified a spatial cluster of institutional delivery with the Somali and Afar region having low utilization rates and Addis Ababa and Tigray regions having the highest utilization rates. The significant individual factors associated with institution delivery were woman antenatal care visits, household wealth index, maternal education, and parity, and the significant community ones were region, place of residence, and educational status. Therefore, to maximize health facility delivery in Ethiopia, the predictors of institutional delivery identified in this study should be given more attention by governmental and nongovernmental stakeholders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚育龄妇女住院分娩的空间分布及相关因素:埃塞俄比亚人口与健康调查案例》。
背景孕产妇死亡率高得令人无法接受。2017 年,约有 29.5 万名妇女在怀孕和分娩期间及之后死亡。这些死亡中的绝大多数(94%)发生在资源匮乏的环境中,而大多数死亡是可以避免的:本研究基于一项使用 2016 年 EDHS 数据进行的横断面研究。分析对象包括调查前五年内分娩的 7590 名妇女。通过 SatScan 空间统计分析,发现了住院分娩的高热点和低热点集群。利用多层次多变量混合效应逻辑回归发现与住院分娩相关的特征:在这项研究中,33.25% 在调查前 5 年内分娩的妇女是在医疗机构分娩的。研究结果还表明,全国住院分娩的空间分布是非随机的。与住院分娩利用率有统计意义的变量如下:在个人层面,富裕程度(AOR = 2.18,95%CI:1.39-3.41)、受教育程度较高(AOR = 3.89,95%CI:1.51-10.01)、产前检查次数达到或超过四次(AOR = 6.57,95%CI:4.83-8.94)、奇偶性大于或等于 1。在社区层面,高等教育(AOR = 1.70,95%CI:1.22-2.36)和城市居住(AOR = 5.30,95%CI:3.10-9.06)是与住院分娩利用率有显著统计学关联的变量:这项研究发现了住院分娩的空间集群,索马里和阿法尔地区的住院分娩利用率较低,而亚的斯亚贝巴和提格雷地区的住院分娩利用率最高。与住院分娩相关的重要个人因素是妇女产前检查次数、家庭财富指数、产妇教育程度和奇偶数,而重要的社区因素是地区、居住地和教育状况。因此,为了最大限度地提高埃塞俄比亚医疗机构的分娩率,政府和非政府利益相关者应更多地关注本研究中确定的住院分娩预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Obstetrics and Gynecology International OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Obstetrics and Gynecology International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a forum for scientists and clinical professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine and infertility, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of "Motivational Interviewing" and "Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills Model" Counseling Interventions on the Choice of Delivery Mode in Pregnant Women Using Face-to-Face Training vs. Mobile App: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Factors Influencing Induction of Labor Success in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Assessment of COVID-19 Vaccine Impact on Women's Menstrual Health within an 18-Month Follow-Up. Association of Hormonal Contraceptives with Depression among Women in Reproductive Age Groups: A Cross-Sectional Analytic Study. Comparison of Time to Pregnancy in In Vitro Fertilisation between Endometriosis and Nonendometriosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1