The Impact of COVID-19 on Inpatient Consultations and the Role of Telehealth: A Retrospective Cohort.

Q4 Medicine Skinmed Pub Date : 2022-06-30 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Alex Sherban, Elizabeth Critchlow, Matthew Keller
{"title":"The Impact of COVID-19 on Inpatient Consultations and the Role of Telehealth: A Retrospective Cohort.","authors":"Alex Sherban,&nbsp;Elizabeth Critchlow,&nbsp;Matthew Keller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Falls in non-COVID-19-related hospital admissions during the pandemic affected the reasons for dermatology consultation and mode of consultation delivery. In order to assess the impact of the pandemic and the effects of telehealth on the inpatient dermatology service, we compared consultations completed between March 17, 2020 and October 31, 2020 with the same period of 2019. Dermatology received fewer consultations for management assistance during the pandemic, possibly due to patients with chronic dermatoses not meeting admission criteria or avoiding hospitalization. Consultations were also less likely to require laboratory work, imaging, and biopsies in 2020, potentially due to frequent consultation of benign conditions enabled by telehealth and stricter enforcement of only completing the biopsies necessary for acute inpatient management. Despite the shift toward remote consultations in 2020, the impact on diagnosis and management remained unchanged compared to 2019. Providers were less likely to document clinical improvement in 2020, potentially attributable to inferior communication regarding management recommendations or an increase in diagnoses not expected to improve. While remote consultations allowed dermatologists to provide comparable care during the pandemic, further research on clinical outcomes of remote consultations is required to maximize its benefits to patients and the healthcare system. (<i>SKINmed</i>. 2022;20:197-204).</p>","PeriodicalId":21891,"journal":{"name":"Skinmed","volume":"20 3","pages":"197-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skinmed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Falls in non-COVID-19-related hospital admissions during the pandemic affected the reasons for dermatology consultation and mode of consultation delivery. In order to assess the impact of the pandemic and the effects of telehealth on the inpatient dermatology service, we compared consultations completed between March 17, 2020 and October 31, 2020 with the same period of 2019. Dermatology received fewer consultations for management assistance during the pandemic, possibly due to patients with chronic dermatoses not meeting admission criteria or avoiding hospitalization. Consultations were also less likely to require laboratory work, imaging, and biopsies in 2020, potentially due to frequent consultation of benign conditions enabled by telehealth and stricter enforcement of only completing the biopsies necessary for acute inpatient management. Despite the shift toward remote consultations in 2020, the impact on diagnosis and management remained unchanged compared to 2019. Providers were less likely to document clinical improvement in 2020, potentially attributable to inferior communication regarding management recommendations or an increase in diagnoses not expected to improve. While remote consultations allowed dermatologists to provide comparable care during the pandemic, further research on clinical outcomes of remote consultations is required to maximize its benefits to patients and the healthcare system. (SKINmed. 2022;20:197-204).

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19对住院会诊的影响和远程医疗的作用:回顾性队列研究
大流行期间,与covid -19无关的住院人数下降,影响了皮肤科会诊的原因和提供会诊的模式。为了评估大流行的影响和远程医疗对住院皮肤科服务的影响,我们将2020年3月17日至2020年10月31日期间完成的会诊与2019年同期进行了比较。在大流行期间,皮肤科获得的管理协助咨询较少,可能是由于慢性皮肤病患者不符合入院标准或避免住院。到2020年,会诊也不太可能需要实验室工作、成像和活检,这可能是由于远程医疗带来的良性疾病的频繁会诊,以及更严格地执行只完成急性住院病人管理所需的活检。尽管2020年转向远程咨询,但与2019年相比,对诊断和管理的影响没有变化。提供者在2020年不太可能记录临床改善,这可能是由于关于管理建议的沟通不足或预计不会改善的诊断增加。虽然远程会诊使皮肤科医生能够在大流行期间提供类似的护理,但需要进一步研究远程会诊的临床结果,以最大限度地为患者和医疗保健系统带来好处。(SKINmed。20:197 2022; 204)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Skinmed
Skinmed Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: SKINmed is a peer-reviewed bimonthly publication circulated to more than 28,000 dermatologists, allergists, internists, pediatricians, and family practitioners with an interest in dermatology and allergy. SKINmed features articles, original papers, and case studies concerning clinical aspects of dermatology, including dermatopathology, diagnostics, occupational dermatology, malignancy/tumors, cosmetic dermatology, endocrine diseases, infestations, infections, and pharmacotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Psori Silk in Mild to Moderate Psoriasis: A Randomized Phase I-II Trial Study. Diagnosing Monkeypox: The "Doughnut Pustule" Debunked. Identification of a Novel PLCD1 Variant in a Danish Family with Hereditary Leukonychia. Verrucous Carcinoma Arising in an Extended Giant Condyloma Acuminatum. The Efficacy of Cryotherapy and Zinc Gluconate in Management of Anogenital Warts: A Randomized Double-Blind, Split-Side, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1