Distinct characteristics of correlation analysis at the single-cell and the population level.

IF 0.9 4区 数学 Q3 Mathematics Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Pub Date : 2022-08-02 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sagmb-2022-0015
Guoyu Wu, Yuchao Li
{"title":"Distinct characteristics of correlation analysis at the single-cell and the population level.","authors":"Guoyu Wu, Yuchao Li","doi":"10.1515/sagmb-2022-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Correlation analysis is widely used in biological studies to infer molecular relationships within biological networks. Recently, single-cell analysis has drawn tremendous interests, for its ability to obtain high-resolution molecular phenotypes. It turns out that there is little overlap of co-expressed genes identified in single-cell level investigations with that of population level investigations. However, the nature of the relationship of correlations between single-cell and population levels remains unclear. In this manuscript, we aimed to unveil the origin of the differences between the correlation coefficients at the single-cell level and that at the population level, and bridge the gap between them. Through developing formulations to link correlations at the single-cell and the population level, we illustrated that aggregated correlations could be stronger, weaker or equal to the corresponding individual correlations, depending on the variations and the correlations within the population. When the correlation within the population is weaker than the individual correlation, the aggregated correlation is stronger than the corresponding individual correlation. Besides, our data indicated that aggregated correlation is more likely to be stronger than the corresponding individual correlation, and it was rare to find gene-pairs exclusively strongly correlated at the single-cell level. Through a bottom-up approach to model interactions between molecules in a signaling cascade or a multi-regulator-controlled gene expression, we surprisingly found that the existence of interaction between two components could not be excluded simply based on their low correlation coefficients, suggesting a reconsideration of connectivity within biological networks which was derived solely from correlation analysis. We also investigated the impact of technical random measurement errors on the correlation coefficients for the single-cell level and the population level. The results indicate that the aggregated correlation is relatively robust and less affected. Because of the heterogeneity among single cells, correlation coefficients calculated based on data of the single-cell level might be different from that of the population level. Depending on the specific question we are asking, proper sampling and normalization procedure should be done before we draw any conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49477,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2022-0015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Correlation analysis is widely used in biological studies to infer molecular relationships within biological networks. Recently, single-cell analysis has drawn tremendous interests, for its ability to obtain high-resolution molecular phenotypes. It turns out that there is little overlap of co-expressed genes identified in single-cell level investigations with that of population level investigations. However, the nature of the relationship of correlations between single-cell and population levels remains unclear. In this manuscript, we aimed to unveil the origin of the differences between the correlation coefficients at the single-cell level and that at the population level, and bridge the gap between them. Through developing formulations to link correlations at the single-cell and the population level, we illustrated that aggregated correlations could be stronger, weaker or equal to the corresponding individual correlations, depending on the variations and the correlations within the population. When the correlation within the population is weaker than the individual correlation, the aggregated correlation is stronger than the corresponding individual correlation. Besides, our data indicated that aggregated correlation is more likely to be stronger than the corresponding individual correlation, and it was rare to find gene-pairs exclusively strongly correlated at the single-cell level. Through a bottom-up approach to model interactions between molecules in a signaling cascade or a multi-regulator-controlled gene expression, we surprisingly found that the existence of interaction between two components could not be excluded simply based on their low correlation coefficients, suggesting a reconsideration of connectivity within biological networks which was derived solely from correlation analysis. We also investigated the impact of technical random measurement errors on the correlation coefficients for the single-cell level and the population level. The results indicate that the aggregated correlation is relatively robust and less affected. Because of the heterogeneity among single cells, correlation coefficients calculated based on data of the single-cell level might be different from that of the population level. Depending on the specific question we are asking, proper sampling and normalization procedure should be done before we draw any conclusions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单细胞和群体水平相关性分析的不同特点。
相关性分析被广泛应用于生物研究,以推断生物网络中的分子关系。最近,单细胞分析因其获得高分辨率分子表型的能力而引起了极大的兴趣。事实证明,单细胞水平研究中发现的共表达基因与群体水平研究中发现的共表达基因几乎没有重叠。然而,单细胞水平与群体水平之间相关关系的性质仍不清楚。在本稿件中,我们旨在揭示单细胞水平相关系数与群体水平相关系数之间差异的根源,并弥合两者之间的差距。通过将单细胞和种群水平的相关性联系起来的公式,我们说明了根据种群内的变化和相关性,聚集相关性可能更强、更弱或与相应的个体相关性相等。当种群内的相关性弱于个体相关性时,聚集相关性就强于相应的个体相关性。此外,我们的数据表明,聚合相关性更有可能强于相应的个体相关性,而在单细胞水平上发现完全强相关性的基因对并不多见。通过自下而上的方法来模拟信号级联或多调控因子控制的基因表达中分子间的相互作用,我们意外地发现,不能简单地根据两个组分的低相关系数来排除它们之间相互作用的存在,这提示我们要重新考虑生物网络内部的连通性,因为这种连通性仅仅是由相关性分析得出的。我们还研究了技术随机测量误差对单细胞水平和群体水平相关系数的影响。结果表明,总体相关性相对稳健,受影响较小。由于单细胞之间存在异质性,根据单细胞水平的数据计算出的相关系数可能与群体水平的相关系数不同。根据我们提出的具体问题,在得出结论之前,应进行适当的取样和归一化处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology seeks to publish significant research on the application of statistical ideas to problems arising from computational biology. The focus of the papers should be on the relevant statistical issues but should contain a succinct description of the relevant biological problem being considered. The range of topics is wide and will include topics such as linkage mapping, association studies, gene finding and sequence alignment, protein structure prediction, design and analysis of microarray data, molecular evolution and phylogenetic trees, DNA topology, and data base search strategies. Both original research and review articles will be warmly received.
期刊最新文献
Empirically adjusted fixed-effects meta-analysis methods in genomic studies. A CNN-CBAM-BIGRU model for protein function prediction. A heavy-tailed model for analyzing miRNA-seq raw read counts. Flexible model-based non-negative matrix factorization with application to mutational signatures. Choice of baseline hazards in joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event cancer survival data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1