Patients' views on Self-administration of Medication during hospitalisation: a mixed-methods study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2022-07-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986221107804
Loes Johanna Maria van Herpen-Meeuwissen, Charlotte Linde Bekker, Nicky Cornelissen, Barbara Maat, Hendrikus Antonius Walterus van Onzenoort, Bartholemeus Johannes Fredericus van den Bemt
{"title":"Patients' views on Self-administration of Medication during hospitalisation: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Loes Johanna Maria van Herpen-Meeuwissen,&nbsp;Charlotte Linde Bekker,&nbsp;Nicky Cornelissen,&nbsp;Barbara Maat,&nbsp;Hendrikus Antonius Walterus van Onzenoort,&nbsp;Bartholemeus Johannes Fredericus van den Bemt","doi":"10.1177/20420986221107804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inpatient Self-administration of Medication (SAM) increases patient involvement in medication management and may increase medication safety. Its implementation is impeded. Successful and sustainable implementation of SAM strongly depends on patients' willingness to participate. This study aimed to identify and quantify patients' views on SAM, related (dis)advantages and prerequisites, patient's willingness to engage in SAM schemes, and their preferences in medication management during hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study was conducted among hospitalised adult patients in four Dutch hospitals during December 2018 and March 2019. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were performed to identify patients' views on SAM. Interview transcripts were subjected to thematic-content analysis. These outcomes were used to construct a questionnaire about patient's willingness to engage in SAM schemes, their preferences for inpatient medication management and level of agreement with statements about SAM's (dis)advantages and prerequisites of SAM. Data were descriptively analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen hospitalised patients [mean (standard deviation; SD) age 61.0 (13.4) years old; 52.6% male] were interviewed. Most patients had a positive view on SAM, but some doubted the necessity to change standard care. Also, patients expressed concerns about medication safety. Prerequisites for SAM implementation were identified. These covered four main themes: information provision, accessible and safe storage, assurance of safety, and clear responsibilities. A total of 234 patients [mean (SD), age 65.3 (13.5) years; 54.7% male] participated in the questionnaire. Although 50.0% of the patients were willing to self-administer medication, patients were ambivalent as only 36.5% preferred SAM over nurse-led administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of patients were positive about SAM. Although half of the patients were willing to perform SAM, most patients did not prefer SAM over standard care. This ambivalent attitude may be overcome when the stated prerequisites are met and patients experience SAM in clinical practice. Based on patients' views, it can be concluded that implementation of SAM seems possible.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong><b>Research to identify patients' views on Self-administration of Medication during hospitalisation</b> <b>Background:</b> Patient involvement is desired by patients. Nevertheless, currently healthcare providers take over patient's medication management when hospitalised. Capable patients administering their own medication during hospitalisation, known as 'Self-administration of Medication' (SAM) is one possible way to increase patient involvement in hospital care and to improve medication safety. Understanding patients' views on SAM, before its actual practice, could help to successfully implement it. In this research, we aimed to identify and measurepatients' views on SAM,(dis)advantages of and requirements for SAM stated by patients,patients' willingness to self-administrate medication,patients' preferences in medication management during hospitalisation.<b>Methods:</b> Our study consisted of two parts and was conducted among hospitalised adult patients in four Dutch hospitals during December 2018 and March 2019. First, patients were interviewed to identify patients'views on SAM,requirements for SAM.Second, the outcomes of these interviews were used to construct a questionnaire aiming to identify patient'swillingness to self-administrate,preferences for self- or nurse-led medication administration,level of agreement with statements about SAM's (dis)advantages and requirements.<b>Results:</b> Nineteen hospitalised patients were interviewed. Most patients had a positive view on SAM, some doubted the necessity to change nurse-led medication administration. Patients mentioned many advantages of SAM, such as increased patient empowerment and contribution to sustainability. Some patients had concerns about medication safety, for example, risking omissions or double administrations.In total, 234 patients completed the questionnaire. Half (50%) of the patients were willing to self-administer medication. However, only 37% of patients preferred SAM over nurse-led medication administration which indicates that the majority of patients were hesitant to actually self-administer medication. The most important requirements for SAM by patients were, 'I want to be informed before my hospitalisation that I have to bring my own medication' (80% agreed) and 'Healthcare professionals must assess per patient whether the patient is able to manage and use his or her own medication' (74% agreed).<b>Conclusion:</b> Most patients mentioned many advantages and had positive views on SAM. Although half of the patients were willing to perform SAM, most patients did not prefer SAM over nurse-led medication administration. This reservation may be overcome when the stated requirements are met and patients experience SAM when admitted to hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/19/f4/10.1177_20420986221107804.PMC9340381.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986221107804","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Inpatient Self-administration of Medication (SAM) increases patient involvement in medication management and may increase medication safety. Its implementation is impeded. Successful and sustainable implementation of SAM strongly depends on patients' willingness to participate. This study aimed to identify and quantify patients' views on SAM, related (dis)advantages and prerequisites, patient's willingness to engage in SAM schemes, and their preferences in medication management during hospitalisation.

Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted among hospitalised adult patients in four Dutch hospitals during December 2018 and March 2019. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were performed to identify patients' views on SAM. Interview transcripts were subjected to thematic-content analysis. These outcomes were used to construct a questionnaire about patient's willingness to engage in SAM schemes, their preferences for inpatient medication management and level of agreement with statements about SAM's (dis)advantages and prerequisites of SAM. Data were descriptively analysed.

Results: Nineteen hospitalised patients [mean (standard deviation; SD) age 61.0 (13.4) years old; 52.6% male] were interviewed. Most patients had a positive view on SAM, but some doubted the necessity to change standard care. Also, patients expressed concerns about medication safety. Prerequisites for SAM implementation were identified. These covered four main themes: information provision, accessible and safe storage, assurance of safety, and clear responsibilities. A total of 234 patients [mean (SD), age 65.3 (13.5) years; 54.7% male] participated in the questionnaire. Although 50.0% of the patients were willing to self-administer medication, patients were ambivalent as only 36.5% preferred SAM over nurse-led administration.

Conclusion: The majority of patients were positive about SAM. Although half of the patients were willing to perform SAM, most patients did not prefer SAM over standard care. This ambivalent attitude may be overcome when the stated prerequisites are met and patients experience SAM in clinical practice. Based on patients' views, it can be concluded that implementation of SAM seems possible.

Plain language summary: Research to identify patients' views on Self-administration of Medication during hospitalisation Background: Patient involvement is desired by patients. Nevertheless, currently healthcare providers take over patient's medication management when hospitalised. Capable patients administering their own medication during hospitalisation, known as 'Self-administration of Medication' (SAM) is one possible way to increase patient involvement in hospital care and to improve medication safety. Understanding patients' views on SAM, before its actual practice, could help to successfully implement it. In this research, we aimed to identify and measurepatients' views on SAM,(dis)advantages of and requirements for SAM stated by patients,patients' willingness to self-administrate medication,patients' preferences in medication management during hospitalisation.Methods: Our study consisted of two parts and was conducted among hospitalised adult patients in four Dutch hospitals during December 2018 and March 2019. First, patients were interviewed to identify patients'views on SAM,requirements for SAM.Second, the outcomes of these interviews were used to construct a questionnaire aiming to identify patient'swillingness to self-administrate,preferences for self- or nurse-led medication administration,level of agreement with statements about SAM's (dis)advantages and requirements.Results: Nineteen hospitalised patients were interviewed. Most patients had a positive view on SAM, some doubted the necessity to change nurse-led medication administration. Patients mentioned many advantages of SAM, such as increased patient empowerment and contribution to sustainability. Some patients had concerns about medication safety, for example, risking omissions or double administrations.In total, 234 patients completed the questionnaire. Half (50%) of the patients were willing to self-administer medication. However, only 37% of patients preferred SAM over nurse-led medication administration which indicates that the majority of patients were hesitant to actually self-administer medication. The most important requirements for SAM by patients were, 'I want to be informed before my hospitalisation that I have to bring my own medication' (80% agreed) and 'Healthcare professionals must assess per patient whether the patient is able to manage and use his or her own medication' (74% agreed).Conclusion: Most patients mentioned many advantages and had positive views on SAM. Although half of the patients were willing to perform SAM, most patients did not prefer SAM over nurse-led medication administration. This reservation may be overcome when the stated requirements are met and patients experience SAM when admitted to hospital.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对住院期间自我用药的看法:一项混合方法研究。
背景:住院患者自我给药(SAM)增加了患者对用药管理的参与,并可能增加用药安全性。它的执行受到阻碍。SAM的成功和可持续实施在很大程度上取决于患者参与的意愿。本研究旨在确定和量化患者对SAM的看法,相关(dis)优势和先决条件,患者参与SAM计划的意愿,以及他们在住院期间对药物管理的偏好。方法:2018年12月至2019年3月,在荷兰四家医院的住院成年患者中进行了一项混合方法研究。进行半结构化的一对一访谈,以确定患者对SAM的看法。访谈笔录进行了专题内容分析。这些结果被用来构建关于患者参与SAM计划的意愿、他们对住院药物管理的偏好以及对SAM的优势和先决条件陈述的同意程度的问卷。对数据进行描述性分析。结果:19例住院患者[平均(标准差;SD)年龄61.0(13.4)岁;(52.6%为男性)。大多数患者对SAM持积极态度,但有些人怀疑改变标准治疗的必要性。此外,患者也表达了对药物安全的担忧。确定了SAM实现的先决条件。其中包括四个主要主题:信息提供、无障碍和安全存储、安全保证以及明确的责任。共234例患者[平均(SD),年龄65.3(13.5)岁;[54.7%男性]参与问卷调查。虽然50.0%的患者愿意自我给药,但只有36.5%的患者选择自我给药,而不是护士引导给药。结论:大部分患者SAM阳性。虽然有一半的患者愿意执行SAM,但大多数患者并不喜欢SAM超过标准护理。当上述前提条件得到满足,患者在临床实践中体验到SAM时,这种矛盾的态度可能会被克服。根据患者的意见,可以得出结论,SAM的实施似乎是可能的。简单的语言总结:研究确定患者对住院期间自我给药的看法背景:患者希望患者参与。然而,目前医疗保健提供者在病人住院时接管了药物管理。有能力的患者在住院期间自行用药,称为“自我用药”(SAM),是增加患者参与医院护理和改善用药安全的一种可能方法。在SAM付诸实践之前,了解患者对其的看法,有助于它的成功实施。在本研究中,我们旨在识别和测量患者对SAM的看法,患者对SAM的优势和要求,患者自我给药的意愿,以及患者在住院期间对药物管理的偏好。方法:我们的研究由两部分组成,于2018年12月至2019年3月在荷兰四家医院的住院成年患者中进行。首先,对患者进行访谈,以确定患者对SAM的看法和对SAM的要求。其次,这些访谈的结果被用来构建一份问卷,旨在确定患者自我给药的意愿、对自我或护士主导给药的偏好、对SAM的优势和要求的认同程度。结果:对19例住院患者进行了访谈。大多数患者对SAM持积极态度,一些人怀疑是否有必要改变护士主导的药物管理。患者提到了SAM的许多优点,例如增加了患者的权力和对可持续性的贡献。一些患者担心药物安全,例如,有遗漏或重复给药的风险。总共有234名患者完成了问卷调查。一半(50%)的患者愿意自我用药。然而,只有37%的患者更喜欢SAM而不是护士主导的药物管理,这表明大多数患者对实际自我用药犹豫不决。患者对自我管理最重要的要求是,“我希望在住院前被告知我必须携带自己的药物”(80%同意)和“医疗保健专业人员必须评估每个患者是否能够管理和使用他或她自己的药物”(74%同意)。结论:大多数患者都提到了SAM的优点,并对其持积极态度。虽然有一半的患者愿意执行SAM,但大多数患者并不喜欢SAM而不是护士主导的药物管理。如果满足了规定的要求,并且患者在入院时经历了SAM,则可以克服这种保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
期刊最新文献
Determining the optimum dose of remifentanil in combination with propofol for total intravenous anaesthesia in hysteroscopy under Narcotrend and SPI monitoring. The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance department in the pharmaceutical industry: results of an Italian national survey. Comparison of a single intravenous infusion of alfentanil or sufentanil combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol for daytime hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial. Governance of artificial intelligence and machine learning in pharmacovigilance: what works today and what more is needed? Patient-centric decision-making in supplements intake and disclosure in clinical practice: a novel SIDP-12 tool to prevent drug-supplement interaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1