Overlapping Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures: Is It Safe?

Jeffrey Klott, Randall T Loder, Brian Mullis
{"title":"Overlapping Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures: Is It Safe?","authors":"Jeffrey Klott,&nbsp;Randall T Loder,&nbsp;Brian Mullis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients who underwent distal radius fracture (open reduction and internal fixation [ORIF]) at a Level 1 trauma center deemed \"overlapping\" (greater than 30 minutes overlap) were compared against consecutive cases. Unplanned return to surgery within 1 year was the primary outcome. Sixty-two patients were included in the overlapping group and 37 in the consecutive group. There was no difference in unplanned return to surgery 1 year following procedure with three cases (5%) in the overlapping group and one case (3%) in the consecutive group. There was a significant difference (p = 0.02) in procedure time between the overlapping group (151 + 54 minutes) and nonoverlapping group (126 + 35 minutes). There was no difference in infection, readmission, nonunion, malunion, deep infection, or superficial infection between groups. Based on a post-hoc power analysis with p < 0.05 and power at 80%, 2,691 patients would be needed to determine if there is truly no difference between groups. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):127-130, 2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":17143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"31 2","pages":"127-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients who underwent distal radius fracture (open reduction and internal fixation [ORIF]) at a Level 1 trauma center deemed "overlapping" (greater than 30 minutes overlap) were compared against consecutive cases. Unplanned return to surgery within 1 year was the primary outcome. Sixty-two patients were included in the overlapping group and 37 in the consecutive group. There was no difference in unplanned return to surgery 1 year following procedure with three cases (5%) in the overlapping group and one case (3%) in the consecutive group. There was a significant difference (p = 0.02) in procedure time between the overlapping group (151 + 54 minutes) and nonoverlapping group (126 + 35 minutes). There was no difference in infection, readmission, nonunion, malunion, deep infection, or superficial infection between groups. Based on a post-hoc power analysis with p < 0.05 and power at 80%, 2,691 patients would be needed to determine if there is truly no difference between groups. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):127-130, 2022).

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重叠手术治疗桡骨远端骨折:安全吗?
在一级创伤中心接受桡骨远端骨折(切开复位内固定[ORIF])的患者被认为“重叠”(超过30分钟重叠)与连续病例进行比较。1年内意外返回手术是主要结局。重叠组62例,连续组37例。重叠组3例(5%),连续组1例(3%),术后1年计划外复诊无差异。重叠组(151 + 54 min)与非重叠组(126 + 35 min)手术时间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.02)。两组间感染、再入院、骨不连、骨不连、深部感染和浅表感染均无差异。基于事后功率分析,p < 0.05,功率为80%,需要2691例患者才能确定两组之间是否真的没有差异。[j] .外科骨科进展,31(2):127- 130,2022。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is an Orthopaedic Surgery Resident's Previous Case Experience Associated with Success of Initial Treatment of Pediatric Forearm Fractures? A Barbed Proximal Femoral Nailing System for Isolated Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: Operative Outcomes. Rare, Atypical Mycobacterium Infection of the Hand in Immunocompetent Individuals. A Regional Analysis of Hospital Readmissions Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and the Impact of Medicaid Expansion. A Sonography-based Decision Model for Use in Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1