Audiovisual intervention alleviates anxiety of patients during PET/CT imaging.

IF 1.2 Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-05 DOI:10.1055/a-1759-4062
Safae Abouzian, Valle Camacho, Aida Sabaté, Patricia Stefaneli, Marina Sizova, Ignasi Gich, Diego López-Mora, Joan Duch, Alejandro Fernández, Montserrat Estorch, Ignasi Carrió, Albert Flotats
{"title":"Audiovisual intervention alleviates anxiety of patients during PET/CT imaging.","authors":"Safae Abouzian,&nbsp;Valle Camacho,&nbsp;Aida Sabaté,&nbsp;Patricia Stefaneli,&nbsp;Marina Sizova,&nbsp;Ignasi Gich,&nbsp;Diego López-Mora,&nbsp;Joan Duch,&nbsp;Alejandro Fernández,&nbsp;Montserrat Estorch,&nbsp;Ignasi Carrió,&nbsp;Albert Flotats","doi":"10.1055/a-1759-4062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>to assess if the use of an audiovisual intervention in the uptake room and/or in the scanning room, could help to reduce anxiety during [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively studied 120 patients referred for [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging. Patients were allocated in 4 groups of 30 patients depending on the use of the audiovisual intervention: (1) no audiovisual intervention; (2) audiovisual intervention only in the uptake room; (3) audiovisual intervention only in the scanning room; (4) audiovisual intervention in the uptake and the scanning rooms. In order to measure the anxiety levels of the patients before and after the scan, all patients answered the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The anxiety status across typical situations on a daily basis (STAI-T) of the 4 groups of patients was comparable with no significant differences. The mean State Anxiety (STAI-S) sum-score at prescan and postscan among groups was: (1) 17.5±8.7 vs. 17.3±8.6, p=0.834; (2) 17.4±10.5 vs. 15.8±9.6, p=0.110; (3) 17.5±11.7 vs. 15.1±9.8, p= 0.013; (4) 17.4±9.7 vs. 14.9±8.1, p= 0.009. The percentage of patients with reduction of the STAI-S score among groups 1-4 was 17%, 47%, 50%, and 66%, respectively. The variation of the percentage of patients with lower scores after intervention among groups was statistically significant (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Audiovisual intervention decreases anxiety levels of patients referred for PET/CT imaging. The results of our study support a beneficial effect of the audiovisual intervention and its potential to alleviate the anxiety of oncological patients who undergo a PET/CT scan.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":" ","pages":"301-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1759-4062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: to assess if the use of an audiovisual intervention in the uptake room and/or in the scanning room, could help to reduce anxiety during [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging.

Methods: We prospectively studied 120 patients referred for [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging. Patients were allocated in 4 groups of 30 patients depending on the use of the audiovisual intervention: (1) no audiovisual intervention; (2) audiovisual intervention only in the uptake room; (3) audiovisual intervention only in the scanning room; (4) audiovisual intervention in the uptake and the scanning rooms. In order to measure the anxiety levels of the patients before and after the scan, all patients answered the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).

Results: The anxiety status across typical situations on a daily basis (STAI-T) of the 4 groups of patients was comparable with no significant differences. The mean State Anxiety (STAI-S) sum-score at prescan and postscan among groups was: (1) 17.5±8.7 vs. 17.3±8.6, p=0.834; (2) 17.4±10.5 vs. 15.8±9.6, p=0.110; (3) 17.5±11.7 vs. 15.1±9.8, p= 0.013; (4) 17.4±9.7 vs. 14.9±8.1, p= 0.009. The percentage of patients with reduction of the STAI-S score among groups 1-4 was 17%, 47%, 50%, and 66%, respectively. The variation of the percentage of patients with lower scores after intervention among groups was statistically significant (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Audiovisual intervention decreases anxiety levels of patients referred for PET/CT imaging. The results of our study support a beneficial effect of the audiovisual intervention and its potential to alleviate the anxiety of oncological patients who undergo a PET/CT scan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视听干预可减轻患者在PET/CT成像过程中的焦虑。
目的:评估在摄取室和/或扫描室使用视听干预是否有助于减少FDG PET/CT成像期间的焦虑[18F]。方法:我们前瞻性研究了120例经FDG PET/CT影像学检查的患者[18F]。根据视听干预的使用情况,将患者分为4组,每组30例患者:(1)不进行视听干预;(2)仅在摄取室进行视听干预;(3)仅在扫描室进行视听干预;(4)在摄取室和扫描室进行视听干预。为了测量扫描前后患者的焦虑水平,所有患者都回答了状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)。结果:4组患者的日常典型情境焦虑状态(STAI-T)具有可比性,无显著差异。各组患者扫描前后状态焦虑(stat -s)总分均值为:(1)17.5±8.7比17.3±8.6,p=0.834;(2) 17.4±10.5 vs. 15.8±9.6,p=0.110;(3) 17.5±11.7 vs. 15.1±9.8,p= 0.013;(4) 17.4±9.7 vs. 14.9±8.1,p= 0.009。1-4组患者的STAI-S评分降低的比例分别为17%、47%、50%和66%。各组间干预后得分较低的患者百分比差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:视听干预降低了转介PET/CT成像患者的焦虑水平。我们的研究结果支持了视听干预的有益效果及其减轻接受PET/CT扫描的肿瘤患者焦虑的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radioactive Gold Isotopes in the Era of Theranostics: Medical Potential of ¹⁹⁸Au and ¹⁹⁹Au Radioisotopes. Radioiodine Therapy Unit as a "No-Care" Ward - A First Experience Report. Myocardial Perfusion SPECT 2024 in Germany: Results of the 10th Survey. Prognostic Significance of CD68+ Macrophages and FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells in Neuroendocrine Tumors. Diagnosis of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis:18F-FDG-PET activity compared to the Echinococcus multilocularis Ulm Ultrasound Classification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1