Current State of Research Gap-Years in Orthopedic Surgery Residency Applicants: Program Directors' Perspectives.

Q3 Medicine The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2022-06-01
Eric J Cotter, Evan M Polce, Kathryn L Williams, Andrea M Spiker, Brian F Grogan, Gerald J Lang
{"title":"Current State of Research Gap-Years in Orthopedic Surgery Residency Applicants: Program Directors' Perspectives.","authors":"Eric J Cotter,&nbsp;Evan M Polce,&nbsp;Kathryn L Williams,&nbsp;Andrea M Spiker,&nbsp;Brian F Grogan,&nbsp;Gerald J Lang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine how orthopedic residency program directors (PDs) evaluate residency applicants who participated in a research gap-year (RGY).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 23 question electronically administered survey was created and emailed to all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) orthopedic residency PDs for the 2020-21 application cycle. PDs were emailed directly if active contact information was identifiable. If not, program coordinators were emailed. The survey contained questions regarding the background information of programs and aimed at identifying how PDs view and evaluate residency applicants who participated in a RGY. Descriptive statistics for each question were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four (41.8%) of 201 PDs responded. Most respondent programs (N=62, 73.8%) identified as an academic center. The most common geographic region was the Midwest, N=33 (39.3%). Few programs (N=3, 3.8%) utilize a publication \"cut-off\" when screening residency applicants. When asked how many peer-reviewed publications were necessary to deem a RGY as \"productive,\" responses ranged from 0-15 publications (median interquartile range 4.5 [3-5]). Forty-one (53.3%) PDs stated they would council medical students to take a RGY with USMLE Step 1 scores being the #1 factor guiding that advice. More PDs disagree than agree (N=35, 43.6%; vs N=22, 28.2%) that applicants who complete a RGY are more competitive applicants, and 35 PDs (45.5%) agree research experiences will become more important in resident selection as USMLE Step 1 transitions to Pass/Fail.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Program directors have varying views on residency applicants who did a RGY. While few programs use a publication cutoff, the median number of publications deemed as being a \"productive\" RGY was approximately 5. Many PDs agree that research experiences will become more important as USMLE Step becomes Pass/Fail. This information can be useful for students interested in pursuing a RGY and for residency programs when evaluating residency applicants. <b>Level of Evidence: IV</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210394/pdf/IOJ-42-01-019.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine how orthopedic residency program directors (PDs) evaluate residency applicants who participated in a research gap-year (RGY).

Methods: A 23 question electronically administered survey was created and emailed to all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) orthopedic residency PDs for the 2020-21 application cycle. PDs were emailed directly if active contact information was identifiable. If not, program coordinators were emailed. The survey contained questions regarding the background information of programs and aimed at identifying how PDs view and evaluate residency applicants who participated in a RGY. Descriptive statistics for each question were performed.

Results: Eighty-four (41.8%) of 201 PDs responded. Most respondent programs (N=62, 73.8%) identified as an academic center. The most common geographic region was the Midwest, N=33 (39.3%). Few programs (N=3, 3.8%) utilize a publication "cut-off" when screening residency applicants. When asked how many peer-reviewed publications were necessary to deem a RGY as "productive," responses ranged from 0-15 publications (median interquartile range 4.5 [3-5]). Forty-one (53.3%) PDs stated they would council medical students to take a RGY with USMLE Step 1 scores being the #1 factor guiding that advice. More PDs disagree than agree (N=35, 43.6%; vs N=22, 28.2%) that applicants who complete a RGY are more competitive applicants, and 35 PDs (45.5%) agree research experiences will become more important in resident selection as USMLE Step 1 transitions to Pass/Fail.

Conclusion: Program directors have varying views on residency applicants who did a RGY. While few programs use a publication cutoff, the median number of publications deemed as being a "productive" RGY was approximately 5. Many PDs agree that research experiences will become more important as USMLE Step becomes Pass/Fail. This information can be useful for students interested in pursuing a RGY and for residency programs when evaluating residency applicants. Level of Evidence: IV.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨科住院医师申请研究空白年的现状:项目主管的观点。
背景:本研究的目的是确定骨科住院医师计划主任(pd)如何评估参加研究间隔年(RGY)的住院医师申请人。方法:创建了一份包含23个问题的电子管理调查,并通过电子邮件发送给所有研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME) 2020-21申请周期的骨科住院医师。如果活跃的联系信息是可识别的,则直接向pd发送电子邮件。如果没有,我们会给项目协调员发电子邮件。该调查包含有关项目背景信息的问题,旨在确定博士如何看待和评估参加RGY的住院医师申请人。对每个问题进行描述性统计。结果:201名pd中有84人(41.8%)回复。大多数被调查的项目(N=62, 73.8%)被确定为学术中心。最常见的地理区域是中西部,N=33(39.3%)。很少有项目(N= 3,3.8%)在筛选住院医师申请人时使用出版物“截止”。当被问及需要多少同行评议的出版物才能认为RGY是“富有成效的”时,回答的范围从0-15份不等(四分位数中位数范围为4.5[3-5])。41位(53.3%)博士表示,他们会建议医科学生参加RGY, USMLE第一步分数是指导该建议的首要因素。不同意多于同意(N=35, 43.6%;(N=22, 28.2%)认为完成RGY的申请人更具竞争力,35名博士(45.5%)认为,随着USMLE第一步过渡到通过/不通过,研究经验将在住院医师选择中变得更加重要。结论:项目主管对做RGY的住院医师申请人有不同的看法。虽然很少有程序使用发布截止,但被认为是“有效的”RGY的发布数量的中位数大约是5。许多博士都认为,随着USMLE步骤变得通过/不通过,研究经验将变得更加重要。这些信息对于有兴趣攻读RGY的学生和在评估住院医师申请时的住院医师项目是有用的。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Iowa orthopaedic journal
The Iowa orthopaedic journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Any original article relevant to orthopaedic surgery, orthopaedic science or the teaching of either will be considered for publication in The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal. Articles will be enthusiastically received from alumni, visitors to the department, members of the Iowa Orthopaedic Society, residents, and friends of The University of Iowa Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation. The journal is published every June.
期刊最新文献
IOWA Orthopedic Journal Editors Emeriti. Rural Communities in the United States Face Persistent Disparities in Access to Orthopaedic Surgical Care. Winquist View of the Femoral Neck: Ideal Visualization of Femoral Neck Fixation. Retrieval of a Lane Plate 82 Years After Implantation: Case Report, Metallurgical Analysis, and Historical Review. Ulnar Nerve Translocation Following a Routine Distal Radius Fracture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1