Should and will "cultured meat" become a reality in our plates?

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Advances in Food and Nutrition Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-25 DOI:10.1016/bs.afnr.2022.04.005
Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury, Sghaier Chriki, Jean-François Hocquette
{"title":"Should and will \"cultured meat\" become a reality in our plates?","authors":"Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury,&nbsp;Sghaier Chriki,&nbsp;Jean-François Hocquette","doi":"10.1016/bs.afnr.2022.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Produced from proliferating cells in bioreactors with a controlled culture medium, \"cultured meat\" has been presented by its supporters, who are mainly private actors (start-ups), as a sustainable solution to meet the growing demand for animal proteins without weaknesses of animal husbandry in terms of environmental impact, animal welfare or even health. The aim of this chapter is to take stock of current knowledge on the potential benefits and pitfalls of this novel product. Since robust scientific arguments are lacking on these aspects, there is no consensus on the health and nutritional qualities of \"cultured meat\" for human consumption and on its potential low environmental impact. In addition, many issues related to the market, legislation, ethics and consumer perception remain to be addressed. The way in which this new product is regarded appears to be influenced by many factors related mainly to its price, as well as to the perception of safety, sensory traits but also environmental and nutritional issues. Therefore, research by universities and public research institutes indicates that \"cultured meat\" production does not present any major advantages in economic, nutritional, sensory, environmental, ethical or social terms compared to conventional meat. Thus, a more balanced diet by diversifying our sources of plant and animal proteins, consuming other meat substitutes, and reducing food losses and waste appear to be more effective short-term solutions to the urgent need of producing enough food for the growing human population (while reducing environmental degradation and animal suffering).</p>","PeriodicalId":35571,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Food and Nutrition Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Food and Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2022.04.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Produced from proliferating cells in bioreactors with a controlled culture medium, "cultured meat" has been presented by its supporters, who are mainly private actors (start-ups), as a sustainable solution to meet the growing demand for animal proteins without weaknesses of animal husbandry in terms of environmental impact, animal welfare or even health. The aim of this chapter is to take stock of current knowledge on the potential benefits and pitfalls of this novel product. Since robust scientific arguments are lacking on these aspects, there is no consensus on the health and nutritional qualities of "cultured meat" for human consumption and on its potential low environmental impact. In addition, many issues related to the market, legislation, ethics and consumer perception remain to be addressed. The way in which this new product is regarded appears to be influenced by many factors related mainly to its price, as well as to the perception of safety, sensory traits but also environmental and nutritional issues. Therefore, research by universities and public research institutes indicates that "cultured meat" production does not present any major advantages in economic, nutritional, sensory, environmental, ethical or social terms compared to conventional meat. Thus, a more balanced diet by diversifying our sources of plant and animal proteins, consuming other meat substitutes, and reducing food losses and waste appear to be more effective short-term solutions to the urgent need of producing enough food for the growing human population (while reducing environmental degradation and animal suffering).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“人造肉”是否会成为我们餐盘上的现实?
“人造肉”的支持者主要是私人行为者(初创企业),他们提出,“人造肉”是一种可持续的解决方案,可以满足对动物蛋白日益增长的需求,而且在环境影响、动物福利甚至健康方面没有畜牧业的弱点。本章的目的是对这种新产品的潜在好处和缺陷进行当前知识的评估。由于在这些方面缺乏强有力的科学论据,因此对于供人类食用的“培养肉”的健康和营养品质以及其潜在的低环境影响没有达成共识。此外,与市场、立法、道德和消费者观念有关的许多问题仍有待解决。人们看待这种新产品的方式似乎受到许多因素的影响,这些因素主要与它的价格、对安全性的看法、感官特征以及环境和营养问题有关。因此,大学和公共研究机构的研究表明,与传统肉类相比,“培养肉”生产在经济、营养、感官、环境、伦理或社会方面没有任何重大优势。因此,通过多样化我们的植物和动物蛋白质来源,消费其他肉类替代品,减少食物损失和浪费,更均衡的饮食似乎是更有效的短期解决方案,可以为不断增长的人口生产足够的食物(同时减少环境退化和动物的痛苦)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Food and Nutrition Research
Advances in Food and Nutrition Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Bioinformatics and bioactive peptides from foods: Do they work together? Edible insects in food. Effect of novel and conventional food processing technologies on Bacillus cereus spores. Food off-odor generation, characterization and recent advances in novel mitigation strategies. Impact of thermal processing on dietary flavonoids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1