Prescribing the Binary for Intersex (and Transgender) Children.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Perspectives in Biology and Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1353/pbm.2022.0027
Elizabeth Reis
{"title":"Prescribing the Binary for Intersex (and Transgender) Children.","authors":"Elizabeth Reis","doi":"10.1353/pbm.2022.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robert Perske argued in 1972 that \"there can be such a thing as human dignity in risk, and there can be a dehumanizing indignity in safety.\" Though Perske was referring to paternalistic care for the intellectually disabled, we can extend his counsel to the persistent attempts to impose a different kind of \"safety,\" including efforts to enforce the gender and sex binary, as intersex surgeries were (and still are) meant to do. This article argues that when physicians surgically and hormonally alter the genitals and gonads of intersex infants, shaping their bodies to safely align with typical male and female bodies and gender roles, they unwittingly subject them to a dehumanizing indignity. Imposing the binary legislatively with anti-transgender bills is similarly harmful and can inadvertently undermine intersex care. Conservative lawmakers' tacit dismissal of young people's transgender identities parallels physicians' paternalistic, even if well-intentioned, efforts to make intersex bodies fit neatly into prescribed categories. Whether legislative or medical, these interventions promote the traditional gender and sex binary and undermine the dignity of such persons' eventual self-authorship.</p>","PeriodicalId":54627,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2022.0027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robert Perske argued in 1972 that "there can be such a thing as human dignity in risk, and there can be a dehumanizing indignity in safety." Though Perske was referring to paternalistic care for the intellectually disabled, we can extend his counsel to the persistent attempts to impose a different kind of "safety," including efforts to enforce the gender and sex binary, as intersex surgeries were (and still are) meant to do. This article argues that when physicians surgically and hormonally alter the genitals and gonads of intersex infants, shaping their bodies to safely align with typical male and female bodies and gender roles, they unwittingly subject them to a dehumanizing indignity. Imposing the binary legislatively with anti-transgender bills is similarly harmful and can inadvertently undermine intersex care. Conservative lawmakers' tacit dismissal of young people's transgender identities parallels physicians' paternalistic, even if well-intentioned, efforts to make intersex bodies fit neatly into prescribed categories. Whether legislative or medical, these interventions promote the traditional gender and sex binary and undermine the dignity of such persons' eventual self-authorship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为双性人(和变性人)儿童开处方。
罗伯特·珀斯克在1972年指出,“在危险中可能存在人类尊严,在安全中也可能存在不人道的侮辱。”虽然佩尔斯克指的是对智障人士的家长式护理,但我们可以将他的建议延伸到持续不断地试图强加一种不同的“安全”,包括强制执行性别和性别二元性的努力,就像双性人手术过去(现在仍然是)的目的一样。这篇文章认为,当医生通过手术和激素改变双性婴儿的生殖器和性腺,使他们的身体与典型的男性和女性身体和性别角色保持一致时,他们无意中使他们受到了不人道的侮辱。用反跨性别法案在立法上强加二元性别同样有害,可能会在不经意间破坏对双性人的照顾。保守派议员对年轻人跨性别身份的默许,与内科医生的家长式作风(即使是出于善意)相对应,他们努力将双性人的身体整齐地归入规定的类别。无论是立法还是医疗,这些干预都促进了传统的性别和性别二元对立,并损害了这些人最终的自我身份的尊严。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, an interdisciplinary scholarly journal whose readers include biologists, physicians, students, and scholars, publishes essays that place important biological or medical subjects in broader scientific, social, or humanistic contexts. These essays span a wide range of subjects, from biomedical topics such as neurobiology, genetics, and evolution, to topics in ethics, history, philosophy, and medical education and practice. The editors encourage an informal style that has literary merit and that preserves the warmth, excitement, and color of the biological and medical sciences.
期刊最新文献
Organismal Superposition and Death "Inherently Limited by Our Imaginations": Health Anxieties, Politics, and the History of the Climate Crisis Diagnosis: What Is the Structure of Its Reasoning? Valuing the Acute Subjective Experience Lived Religion in Religious Vaccine Exemptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1