Effect of Calcium-based Phosphate Binders Versus Sevelamer on Mortality of Patients with Hemodialysis: A Meta-analysis.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Iranian journal of kidney diseases Pub Date : 2022-07-01
Poxuan Zhang, Shengmei Sang, Jinlan Huang, Sujuan Feng, Caiyun Feng, Rong Wang
{"title":"Effect of Calcium-based Phosphate Binders Versus Sevelamer on Mortality of Patients with Hemodialysis: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Poxuan Zhang,&nbsp;Shengmei Sang,&nbsp;Jinlan Huang,&nbsp;Sujuan Feng,&nbsp;Caiyun Feng,&nbsp;Rong Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic kidney disease is a public health problem. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of sevelamer and calciumbased binders on mortality of hemodialysis patients. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for related articles published before May 14, 2020. We included six studies with 43330 participants, of which 21147 and 22183 received calciumbased phosphate binders and sevelamer, respectively. In the analysis of unadjusted data, sevelamer could lower cardiovascular mortality. When adjusted HRs was pooled, the cardiovascular mortality did not differ significantly in the sevelamer and calcium-based phosphate binders groups. Additionally, the all-cause mortality rate in sevelamer group was different from that in calcium-based phosphate binders group. However, sevelamer could not lower all-cause mortality in terms of the adjusted data. No significant difference was found in calcium and phosphorus between calcium-based phosphate binders and sevalmer. Sensitivity analysis showed that partial results of the study were inconsistent. There was no difference in the effect of sevelamer and calciumbased phosphate binders on the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with hemodialysis, after adjusting confounders. However, given the instability of the results, the results need to be further confirmed by a large sample and high quality RCTs.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.6814.</p>","PeriodicalId":14610,"journal":{"name":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease is a public health problem. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of sevelamer and calciumbased binders on mortality of hemodialysis patients. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for related articles published before May 14, 2020. We included six studies with 43330 participants, of which 21147 and 22183 received calciumbased phosphate binders and sevelamer, respectively. In the analysis of unadjusted data, sevelamer could lower cardiovascular mortality. When adjusted HRs was pooled, the cardiovascular mortality did not differ significantly in the sevelamer and calcium-based phosphate binders groups. Additionally, the all-cause mortality rate in sevelamer group was different from that in calcium-based phosphate binders group. However, sevelamer could not lower all-cause mortality in terms of the adjusted data. No significant difference was found in calcium and phosphorus between calcium-based phosphate binders and sevalmer. Sensitivity analysis showed that partial results of the study were inconsistent. There was no difference in the effect of sevelamer and calciumbased phosphate binders on the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with hemodialysis, after adjusting confounders. However, given the instability of the results, the results need to be further confirmed by a large sample and high quality RCTs.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.6814.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钙基磷酸盐结合剂对血液透析患者死亡率的影响:一项荟萃分析。
慢性肾脏疾病是一个公共卫生问题。本研究的目的是比较sevelamer和钙基粘合剂对血液透析患者死亡率的影响。检索PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science在2020年5月14日之前发表的相关文章。我们纳入了6项研究,共43330名受试者,其中分别有21147名和22183名接受了钙基磷酸盐结合剂和sevelamer。在未经调整的数据分析中,sevelamer可以降低心血管死亡率。当校正后的hr合并时,心血管死亡率在七维拉默和钙基磷酸盐结合剂组之间没有显著差异。此外,西维拉默组的全因死亡率与钙基磷酸盐结合剂组不同。然而,根据调整后的数据,sevelamer不能降低全因死亡率。钙基磷酸盐粘结剂与固相剂的钙磷含量无显著差异。敏感性分析显示部分研究结果不一致。在调整混杂因素后,sevelamer和钙基磷酸盐结合剂对血液透析患者全因死亡率的影响没有差异。然而,考虑到结果的不稳定性,结果需要通过大样本和高质量的rct进一步证实。DOI: 10.52547 / ijkd.6814。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian journal of kidney diseases
Iranian journal of kidney diseases UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases (IJKD), a peer-reviewed journal in English, is the official publication of the Iranian Society of Nephrology. The aim of the IJKD is the worldwide reflection of the knowledge produced by the scientists and clinicians in nephrology. Published quarterly, the IJKD provides a new platform for advancement of the field. The journal’s objective is to serve as a focal point for debates and exchange of knowledge and experience among researchers in a global context. Original papers, case reports, and invited reviews on all aspects of the kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis, and transplantation will be covered by the IJKD. Research on the basic science, clinical practice, and socio-economics of renal health are all welcomed by the editors of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Association Between the G82S Polymorphism of the Receptor Gene for Advanced Glycation End-products and Soluble Serum Levels RAGE with Diabetic Nephropathy in the White (Asian) Race. MiR-33a Overexpression Exacerbates Diabetic Nephropathy Through Sirt6-dependent Notch Signaling. Nighttime Blood Pressure Abnormalities in Iranian CKD Patients: Necessity to Perform Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. Shenqi Pill Mitigates Renal Interstitial Fibrosis Through Weakening Notch1/Jag1 Pathway. Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability on Graft Outcomes in Adherent Renal Transplantation Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1