What semantic analysis can tell us about long term trends in the global STI policy agenda.

IF 4.6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Technology Transfer Pub Date : 2022-08-04 DOI:10.1007/s10961-022-09959-5
Leonid Gokhberg, Dirk Meissner, Ilya Kuzminov
{"title":"What semantic analysis can tell us about long term trends in the global STI policy agenda.","authors":"Leonid Gokhberg, Dirk Meissner, Ilya Kuzminov","doi":"10.1007/s10961-022-09959-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scope, complexity and the \"volume\" of knowledge accumulated render producing an overview of the core themes of science, technology and innovation policies difficult. Reviews of this policy domain mostly either refer to general issues without deep immersion into details or focus on specific narrower aspects. The paper uses semantic analysis to identify major themes of science, technology and innovation policies over the last three decades and to trace their evolution towards current policy setting. We use semantic tools for processing and analysing documents produced by one of the major and highly reputable international expert bodies, the OECD Working Party on Technology and Innovation Policy. We show that selected themes remain in the mainstream even though being affected by regular policy adjustments and refinements and which disappear or appear with new challenges and expected solutions. Other themes appear niche or exotic themes which are under discussion for some time only.</p>","PeriodicalId":48228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology Transfer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09959-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scope, complexity and the "volume" of knowledge accumulated render producing an overview of the core themes of science, technology and innovation policies difficult. Reviews of this policy domain mostly either refer to general issues without deep immersion into details or focus on specific narrower aspects. The paper uses semantic analysis to identify major themes of science, technology and innovation policies over the last three decades and to trace their evolution towards current policy setting. We use semantic tools for processing and analysing documents produced by one of the major and highly reputable international expert bodies, the OECD Working Party on Technology and Innovation Policy. We show that selected themes remain in the mainstream even though being affected by regular policy adjustments and refinements and which disappear or appear with new challenges and expected solutions. Other themes appear niche or exotic themes which are under discussion for some time only.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语义分析可以告诉我们全球科技创新政策议程的长期趋势。
知识积累的范围、复杂性和 "数量 "使得对科学、技术和创新政策的核心主题进行综述十分困难。对这一政策领域的评论大多要么只提及一般性问题,而没有深入探讨细节,要么只关注较窄的具体方面。本文利用语义分析来确定过去三十年中科学、技术和创新政策的主要专题,并追溯其在当前政策制定过程中的演变。我们使用语义工具来处理和分析由主要的、声誉卓著的国际专家机构之一--经合组织技术与创新政策工作组--编写的文件。我们发现,一些选定的主题虽然受到定期政策调整和完善的影响,但仍然是主流主题,并随着新的挑战和预期解决方案的出现而消失或出现。其他主题则是小众或奇特的主题,只讨论了一段时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Journal of Technology Transfer provides an international forum for research on the economic, managerial and policy implication of technology transfer, entrepreneurship, and innovation. The Journal is especially interested in articles that focus on the relationship between the external environment and organizations (governments, public agencies, firms, universities) and their innovation process. The Journal welcomes alternative modes of presentation ranging from broad empirical analyses, to theoretical models, to case studies based on theoretical foundations.  Officially cited as: J Technol Transf
期刊最新文献
An empirical investigation into UK university–industry collaboration: the development of an impact framework Supply chain constraints and research spending: an international investigation A micro-level study of research impact and motivational diversity Public biofoundries as innovation intermediaries: the integration of translation, sustainability, and responsibility Analysis of factors influencing attitude and intention to use electric vehicles for a sustainable future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1