Pre-treatment Nutritional Risk Assessment by NRS-2002 Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Single Center Retrospective Study.

Clinical nutrition research Pub Date : 2022-07-28 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.7762/cnr.2022.11.3.183
Se Eung Oh, Juong Soon Park, Hei-Cheul Jeung
{"title":"Pre-treatment Nutritional Risk Assessment by NRS-2002 Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Single Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Se Eung Oh,&nbsp;Juong Soon Park,&nbsp;Hei-Cheul Jeung","doi":"10.7762/cnr.2022.11.3.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the predictors of survival in patients with advanced BTC according to their baseline nutritional status estimated by the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS)-2002. From September 2006 to July 2017, we reviewed the data of 601 inpatients with BTC. Data on demographic and clinical parameters was collected from electronic medical records, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the stepwise Cox regression analysis. Patients with an NRS-2002 score of ≤ 2, 3, and ≥ 4 were respectively classified as \"no risk,\" \"moderate risk,\" \"high risk.\" Following initial NRS-2002 score, 333 patients (55%) were classified as \"no-risk,\" 109 patients (18%) as \"moderate-risk,\" and 159 patients (27%) as \"high-risk.\" Survival analysis demonstrated significant differences in the median OS: \"no-risk\": 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5-13.7); \"moderate-risk\": 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.3-8.0); and \"high-risk\": 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.6) (p < 0.001). NRS-2002 score was an independent factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.616 for \"moderate-risk\", 95% CI, 1.288-2.027, p < 0.001; HR, 2.121 for \"high-risk\", 95% CI, 1.722-2.612, p < 0.001), along with liver metastasis, peritoneal seeding, white blood cell count, platelet count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, cholesterol, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. In conclusion, baseline NRS-2002 is an appropriate method for discriminating those who are already malnourished and who have poor prognosis in advanced BTC patient. Significance of these results merit further validation to be integrated in the routine practice to improve quality of care in BTC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72617,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition research","volume":"11 3","pages":"183-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/e7/cnr-11-183.PMC9348911.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7762/cnr.2022.11.3.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We investigated the predictors of survival in patients with advanced BTC according to their baseline nutritional status estimated by the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS)-2002. From September 2006 to July 2017, we reviewed the data of 601 inpatients with BTC. Data on demographic and clinical parameters was collected from electronic medical records, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the stepwise Cox regression analysis. Patients with an NRS-2002 score of ≤ 2, 3, and ≥ 4 were respectively classified as "no risk," "moderate risk," "high risk." Following initial NRS-2002 score, 333 patients (55%) were classified as "no-risk," 109 patients (18%) as "moderate-risk," and 159 patients (27%) as "high-risk." Survival analysis demonstrated significant differences in the median OS: "no-risk": 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5-13.7); "moderate-risk": 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.3-8.0); and "high-risk": 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.6) (p < 0.001). NRS-2002 score was an independent factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.616 for "moderate-risk", 95% CI, 1.288-2.027, p < 0.001; HR, 2.121 for "high-risk", 95% CI, 1.722-2.612, p < 0.001), along with liver metastasis, peritoneal seeding, white blood cell count, platelet count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, cholesterol, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. In conclusion, baseline NRS-2002 is an appropriate method for discriminating those who are already malnourished and who have poor prognosis in advanced BTC patient. Significance of these results merit further validation to be integrated in the routine practice to improve quality of care in BTC patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NRS-2002治疗前营养风险评估预测晚期胆道癌患者预后:一项单中心回顾性研究
根据营养风险筛查(NRS)-2002估计的基线营养状况,我们调查了晚期BTC患者的生存预测因素。我们回顾了2006年9月至2017年7月601例BTC住院患者的数据。从电子病历中收集人口学和临床参数数据,采用Kaplan-Meier法和逐步Cox回归分析总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(progression-free survival)。NRS-2002评分≤2、3和≥4的患者分别分为“无风险”、“中度风险”和“高风险”。根据最初的NRS-2002评分,333名患者(55%)被分类为“无风险”,109名患者(18%)被分类为“中度风险”,159名患者(27%)被分类为“高风险”。生存分析显示中位OS有显著差异:“无风险”:12.6个月(95%可信区间[CI], 11.5-13.7);“中度危险”:6.1个月(95% CI, 4.3-8.0);“高危”:3.9个月(95% CI, 3.2-4.6) (p < 0.001)。NRS-2002评分是OS的独立影响因素(风险比[HR],“中度风险”为1.616,95% CI, 1.288 ~ 2.027, p < 0.001;“高危”的HR为2.121,95% CI为1.722-2.612,p < 0.001),以及肝转移、腹膜播种、白细胞计数、血小板计数、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、胆固醇、癌胚抗原和碳水化合物抗原19-9。总之,基线NRS-2002是鉴别晚期BTC患者是否已经营养不良和预后不良的合适方法。这些结果的意义值得进一步验证,以整合到日常实践中,以提高BTC患者的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calcium Intake and the Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. 5A's Behavior Change Model Improves Nutrition Knowledge and Intake Among Adolescent Athletes. Continuous Postpandemic Increase in the Use of Nutrition Fact Labels Among Korean Adults: A Weighted Multiyear Analysis of a Nationwide Survey. Flaxseed Lowers Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Subjects: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Korean Food Exchange Lists for Diabetes Meal Planning: Revised 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1