Pit picking vs. Limberg flap vs. primary open method to treat pilonidal sinus disease - A cohort of 327 consecutive patients.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Innovative Surgical Sciences Pub Date : 2022-06-27 eCollection Date: 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1515/iss-2021-0041
Dietrich Doll, Sven Petersen, Octavia Alexandra Andreae, Hanne Matner, Henning Albrecht, Lukas E Brügger, Markus M Luedi, Gero Puhl
{"title":"Pit picking vs. Limberg flap vs. primary open method to treat pilonidal sinus disease - A cohort of 327 consecutive patients.","authors":"Dietrich Doll, Sven Petersen, Octavia Alexandra Andreae, Hanne Matner, Henning Albrecht, Lukas E Brügger, Markus M Luedi, Gero Puhl","doi":"10.1515/iss-2021-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) surgery are becoming standard. Although long-term results are available for some techniques, long-term outcome data of patients after pit picking is lacking. We aimed at investigating perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing pit picking, Limberg flap or primary open surgery to treat PSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-centre observational study, we evaluated the outcomes of 327 consecutive patients undergoing PSD surgery between 2011 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSD had recurred in 22% of Limberg flap patients and 62% of pit picking patients at 5 years (p=0.0078; log rank test). Previous pilonidal surgeries, smoking, body mass index, immunodeficiency, and diabetes did not significantly influence the long-term recurrence rate. Primary open treatment was performed for 72% of female patients presenting with primary disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to its especially dismal long-term results, pit picking should be abandoned, and Limberg flap should be promoted instead, even for primary disease and in females.</p>","PeriodicalId":44186,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","volume":"7 1","pages":"23-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9352183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2021-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) surgery are becoming standard. Although long-term results are available for some techniques, long-term outcome data of patients after pit picking is lacking. We aimed at investigating perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing pit picking, Limberg flap or primary open surgery to treat PSD.

Methods: In a single-centre observational study, we evaluated the outcomes of 327 consecutive patients undergoing PSD surgery between 2011 and 2020.

Results: PSD had recurred in 22% of Limberg flap patients and 62% of pit picking patients at 5 years (p=0.0078; log rank test). Previous pilonidal surgeries, smoking, body mass index, immunodeficiency, and diabetes did not significantly influence the long-term recurrence rate. Primary open treatment was performed for 72% of female patients presenting with primary disease.

Conclusions: Due to its especially dismal long-term results, pit picking should be abandoned, and Limberg flap should be promoted instead, even for primary disease and in females.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采坑法与林贝格皮瓣法相比,前者治疗朝天鼻窦疾病,后者则采用开放式方法。
背景:朝天鼻窦疾病(PSD)手术的微创方法已成为标准方法。虽然一些技术已经有了长期结果,但还缺乏剔除凹陷后患者的长期疗效数据。我们的目的是调查接受剔坑术、Limberg皮瓣或初次开放手术治疗PSD患者的围手术期和长期疗效:在一项单中心观察性研究中,我们对 2011 年至 2020 年间接受 PSD 手术的 327 名连续患者的疗效进行了评估:结果:5年后,22%的Limberg皮瓣患者和62%的基坑剔除术患者PSD复发(P=0.0078;对数秩检验)。曾接受过朝天鼻手术、吸烟、体重指数、免疫缺陷和糖尿病对长期复发率无明显影响。72%的女性原发性患者接受了初次开放治疗:结论:由于凹陷剔除术的长期效果特别差,因此应放弃这种方法,而改用Limberg皮瓣,即使是原发性疾病和女性患者也应如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Periprosthetic joint infections - a scoping review. What's new in surgery? Essentials 2024 - young patients and fast decisions. A narrative review of present knowledge and digital approaches in orthognathic surgery. Update burn surgery: overview of current multidisciplinary treatment concepts. Early enteral nutrition (EEN) following intestinal anastomosis in pediatric patients - what's new?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1