The Factors for Success and Lack of Success in the Breast Cancer Patient Care Pathway: A Qualitative Study From the Health Care Staff Perspective.

Eija Metsälä, Tanja Schroderus-Salo, Kjersti Straume, Bergliot Strom, Laurent Marmy, Mona Øynes, José A Pires Jorge, Liis Randle, Siret Kivistik
{"title":"The Factors for Success and Lack of Success in the Breast Cancer Patient Care Pathway: A Qualitative Study From the Health Care Staff Perspective.","authors":"Eija Metsälä,&nbsp;Tanja Schroderus-Salo,&nbsp;Kjersti Straume,&nbsp;Bergliot Strom,&nbsp;Laurent Marmy,&nbsp;Mona Øynes,&nbsp;José A Pires Jorge,&nbsp;Liis Randle,&nbsp;Siret Kivistik","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-3-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To produce information about factors related to successful and unsuccessful breast cancer care pathways from the health care staff perspective.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic qualitative survey was used to collect data simultaneously from hospitals located in four different countries, focusing on four professional groups: diagnostic radiographers; radiation therapists; breast cancer nurses; and biomedical laboratory scientists (n = 23). The hospitals participating in the study treat breast cancer patients and research permits were applied from all of them. Data was analysed by deductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the core of a successful breast cancer care pathway is the right content and timely information provided to the patient at the pace the patient is able to adopt. This is especially highlighted at the beginning of the treatment process. In regards to diagnostic services, rigorous execution of mammography, sampling techniques and analyses were seen as important. Staff also valued the importance of aftercare and follow-up, and highlighted the fact that the patient should be given a chance to keep in close contact with care and treatment staff, even after their active treatment process has finished.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Health care staff recognized the same success factors for optimal breast cancer care and treatment pathways as patients reported in previous studies, yet more emphasis was put on patient characteristics and the technical performance features of the process. Both patient and staff viewpoints should be taken into account in planning breast cancer care pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":11885,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":"18 3","pages":"222-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255659/pdf/ejbh-18-222.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-3-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To produce information about factors related to successful and unsuccessful breast cancer care pathways from the health care staff perspective.

Materials and methods: An electronic qualitative survey was used to collect data simultaneously from hospitals located in four different countries, focusing on four professional groups: diagnostic radiographers; radiation therapists; breast cancer nurses; and biomedical laboratory scientists (n = 23). The hospitals participating in the study treat breast cancer patients and research permits were applied from all of them. Data was analysed by deductive thematic analysis.

Results: At the core of a successful breast cancer care pathway is the right content and timely information provided to the patient at the pace the patient is able to adopt. This is especially highlighted at the beginning of the treatment process. In regards to diagnostic services, rigorous execution of mammography, sampling techniques and analyses were seen as important. Staff also valued the importance of aftercare and follow-up, and highlighted the fact that the patient should be given a chance to keep in close contact with care and treatment staff, even after their active treatment process has finished.

Conclusion: Health care staff recognized the same success factors for optimal breast cancer care and treatment pathways as patients reported in previous studies, yet more emphasis was put on patient characteristics and the technical performance features of the process. Both patient and staff viewpoints should be taken into account in planning breast cancer care pathways.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌患者护理路径成功与失败的因素:一项来自医护人员视角的定性研究。
目的:从医护人员的角度了解乳腺癌护理途径成功与不成功的相关因素。材料和方法:采用电子定性调查同时从四个不同国家的医院收集数据,重点关注四个专业群体:诊断放射技师;辐射治疗;乳腺癌护士;生物医学实验室科学家(n = 23)。参与研究的医院治疗乳腺癌患者,所有医院都申请了研究许可。数据采用演绎主题分析法进行分析。结果:成功的乳腺癌护理路径的核心是以患者能够接受的速度向患者提供正确的内容和及时的信息。这一点在治疗过程开始时尤其突出。在诊断服务方面,严格执行乳房x光检查、抽样技术和分析被认为是重要的。工作人员还重视善后护理和随访的重要性,并强调患者应该有机会与护理和治疗人员保持密切接触,即使在他们的积极治疗过程结束后。结论:卫生保健人员认识到最佳乳腺癌护理和治疗途径的成功因素与先前研究中报告的患者相同,但更多的是强调患者特征和该过程的技术性能特征。在规划乳腺癌护理途径时应考虑到患者和工作人员的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rare Case of Concurrent Lupus Mastitis and Sarcoidosis in a 62-Year-Old Female High Levels of Superoxide Dismutase 2 Are Associated With Worse Prognosis in Patients With Breast Cancer The Effect of Informative Mobile App Use on Anxiety, Distress, and Quality of Life of Women With Breast Cancer Bioinformatic Investigation of Genetic Changes in Paraoxonase Genes in Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes Skin Staining After Injection of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide for Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection: A Retrospective Study of Two Protocols for Injection and Long-Term Follow-Up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1