Study of endothelial function and vascular stiffness in patients affected by dilated cardiomyopathy on treatment with sacubitril/valsartan.

IF 1.3 American journal of cardiovascular disease Pub Date : 2022-06-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Ludovica Amore, Fabio Alghisi, Edoardo Pancaldi, Greta Pascariello, Angelica Cersosimo, Giuliana Cimino, Nicola Bernardi, Emiliano Calvi, Carlo Mario Lombardi, Edoardo Sciatti, Enrico Vizzardi, Marco Metra
{"title":"Study of endothelial function and vascular stiffness in patients affected by dilated cardiomyopathy on treatment with sacubitril/valsartan.","authors":"Ludovica Amore,&nbsp;Fabio Alghisi,&nbsp;Edoardo Pancaldi,&nbsp;Greta Pascariello,&nbsp;Angelica Cersosimo,&nbsp;Giuliana Cimino,&nbsp;Nicola Bernardi,&nbsp;Emiliano Calvi,&nbsp;Carlo Mario Lombardi,&nbsp;Edoardo Sciatti,&nbsp;Enrico Vizzardi,&nbsp;Marco Metra","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The multiple beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction are vastly known, but still no or few mentions have been made regarding its effects on endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>To understand more deeply if sacubitril/valsartan may have a role on endothelial function and arterial stiffness, 15 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were evaluated through transthoracic echocardiography, peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPAT<sup>®</sup>) and applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor<sup>®</sup> Px system). These noninvasive exams were performed at the beginning of the study and after 6 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aortic stiffness parameters didn't differ after 6 months of treatment. Augmentation pressure (P=0.889), augmentation index (P=0.906) and sphygmic wave velocity (P=0.263) increased slightly, but they weren't found to be statistically significant. Systolic, diastolic, and differential central arterial pressure didn't differ at the beginning and at the end of the study. RHI (reactive hyperemia index) increased significantly after 6 months (P=0.001) as well as augmentation index corrected for 75 bpm. Ejection fraction (32.21% ± 5.7 to 38.43% ± 8.4; P=0.010) and diastolic dysfunction degree (P=0.021) improved. There was an improvement in mitral regurgitation that wasn't statistically significant (P=0.116). TAPSE didn't change while pulmonary systolic arterial pressure increased, although not significantly (22.83 mmHg ± 4 to 27.33 mmHg ± 6; P=0.068) and within the normal range values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even though in a study with a limited number of patients, sacubitril/valsartan improved endothelial function, left ventricular function, MR, and diastolic function significantly in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and reduced LVEF. It showed no effects on vascular stiffness.</p>","PeriodicalId":7427,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","volume":"12 3","pages":"125-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301027/pdf/ajcd0012-0125.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The multiple beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction are vastly known, but still no or few mentions have been made regarding its effects on endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness.

Patients and methods: To understand more deeply if sacubitril/valsartan may have a role on endothelial function and arterial stiffness, 15 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were evaluated through transthoracic echocardiography, peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPAT®) and applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor® Px system). These noninvasive exams were performed at the beginning of the study and after 6 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment.

Results: Aortic stiffness parameters didn't differ after 6 months of treatment. Augmentation pressure (P=0.889), augmentation index (P=0.906) and sphygmic wave velocity (P=0.263) increased slightly, but they weren't found to be statistically significant. Systolic, diastolic, and differential central arterial pressure didn't differ at the beginning and at the end of the study. RHI (reactive hyperemia index) increased significantly after 6 months (P=0.001) as well as augmentation index corrected for 75 bpm. Ejection fraction (32.21% ± 5.7 to 38.43% ± 8.4; P=0.010) and diastolic dysfunction degree (P=0.021) improved. There was an improvement in mitral regurgitation that wasn't statistically significant (P=0.116). TAPSE didn't change while pulmonary systolic arterial pressure increased, although not significantly (22.83 mmHg ± 4 to 27.33 mmHg ± 6; P=0.068) and within the normal range values.

Conclusions: Even though in a study with a limited number of patients, sacubitril/valsartan improved endothelial function, left ventricular function, MR, and diastolic function significantly in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and reduced LVEF. It showed no effects on vascular stiffness.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
舒比利/缬沙坦治疗扩张型心肌病患者内皮功能和血管僵硬度的研究。
背景:萨克比里尔/缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭并射血分数降低的多重有益作用已广为人知,但其对内皮功能障碍和动脉僵硬的影响尚未或很少提及。患者和方法:为了更深入地了解沙比利/缬沙坦是否对内皮功能和动脉硬度有影响,我们通过经胸超声心动图、外周动脉血压计(EndoPAT®)和压平血压计(sphygmoor®Px系统)评估了15例扩张型心肌病合并左室射血分数(LVEF)降低的患者。这些无创检查在研究开始时和服用苏比里尔/缬沙坦6个月后进行。结果:治疗6个月后主动脉硬度参数无明显差异。增强压(P=0.889)、增强指数(P=0.906)和血压波速度(P=0.263)略有升高,但差异无统计学意义。收缩压、舒张压和中心动脉压差在研究开始和结束时没有差异。6个月后RHI(反应性充血指数)显著增加(P=0.001), 75 bpm校正后的增强指数也显著增加。射血分数(32.21%±5.7 ~ 38.43%±8.4;P=0.010),舒张功能不全程度(P=0.021)明显改善。二尖瓣返流改善无统计学意义(P=0.116)。肺动脉收缩压升高时,TAPSE无明显变化(22.83 mmHg±4 ~ 27.33 mmHg±6;P=0.068),且在正常范围内。结论:尽管在一项患者数量有限的研究中,sacubitril/缬沙坦可显著改善扩张型心肌病和LVEF降低患者的内皮功能、左心室功能、MR和舒张功能。它对血管硬度没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of cardiovascular disease
American journal of cardiovascular disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes following ultrathin vs thin-strut drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and risk of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A diagnostic prediction model for the early detection of heart failure following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. A normal and particularly small (<35 mm) left atrial size measured during echocardiography suggests low likelihood of moderate or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Exploring the impact of metabolites function on heart failure and coronary heart disease: insights from a Mendelian randomization (MR) study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1