Is PSA Still the Best Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer?

Serkan Akan, Numan Doğu Güner, Caner Ediz, Aytaç Şahin, Ayhan Verit
{"title":"Is PSA Still the Best Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer?","authors":"Serkan Akan,&nbsp;Numan Doğu Güner,&nbsp;Caner Ediz,&nbsp;Aytaç Şahin,&nbsp;Ayhan Verit","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2022.2101165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) experience heterogeneous oncological outcomes. In this study, we assessed the patients who underwent an RP procedure because of high-risk prostate cancer in subgroups formed according to D'Amico criteria and analyzed the effects of these criteria on biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified high-risk non-metastatic PCa patients who underwent RP between 2006 and 2020 in our hospital. Groups were formed as follows: group 1 consisted of those with an ISUP grade 4 - 5 biopsy, group 2 consisted of those with a clinical stage T2c, group 3 consisted of those with a tPSA level ≥ 20 ng/ml, and group 4 consisted of those with locally advanced disease. Survival analyses were made by Kaplan-Meier test and Log Rank test. A <i>P</i> value <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all patients, 61.8% were cured by only RP and 38.2% had recurrences. Rates of BCR were significantly different among groups (<i>P</i> = 0.003). In group 1, group 2, group 3, and group 4, BCR rates were 30.8%, 13%, 40.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. Mean BCR-free survival was 82.47 ± 11.64 months. In group 2, BCR-free survival was higher than that in group 3 and group 4 (<i>P</i>1 = 0.020 and <i>P</i>2 = 0.001) and in group 1, BCR-free survival was higher than that in group 4 (<i>P</i> = 0.016). There was no significant difference between group 3 and 4 (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the developments in the imaging technology, an elevated tPSA level remains to be an important predictor for BCR-free survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":284931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1733-1738"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2022.2101165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) experience heterogeneous oncological outcomes. In this study, we assessed the patients who underwent an RP procedure because of high-risk prostate cancer in subgroups formed according to D'Amico criteria and analyzed the effects of these criteria on biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP.

Methods: We retrospectively identified high-risk non-metastatic PCa patients who underwent RP between 2006 and 2020 in our hospital. Groups were formed as follows: group 1 consisted of those with an ISUP grade 4 - 5 biopsy, group 2 consisted of those with a clinical stage T2c, group 3 consisted of those with a tPSA level ≥ 20 ng/ml, and group 4 consisted of those with locally advanced disease. Survival analyses were made by Kaplan-Meier test and Log Rank test. A P value <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Results: Of all patients, 61.8% were cured by only RP and 38.2% had recurrences. Rates of BCR were significantly different among groups (P = 0.003). In group 1, group 2, group 3, and group 4, BCR rates were 30.8%, 13%, 40.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. Mean BCR-free survival was 82.47 ± 11.64 months. In group 2, BCR-free survival was higher than that in group 3 and group 4 (P1 = 0.020 and P2 = 0.001) and in group 1, BCR-free survival was higher than that in group 4 (P = 0.016). There was no significant difference between group 3 and 4 (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Despite the developments in the imaging technology, an elevated tPSA level remains to be an important predictor for BCR-free survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PSA仍然是高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的最佳预测指标吗?
背景:高危前列腺癌(PCa)患者的肿瘤预后不同。在本研究中,我们根据D'Amico标准对高危前列腺癌行RP手术的患者进行分组,并分析这些标准对RP术后生化复发(BCR)的影响。方法:回顾性分析2006年至2020年间在我院行RP手术的高危非转移性PCa患者。分组如下:1组为ISUP 4 - 5级活检患者,2组为临床分期T2c患者,3组为tPSA水平≥20 ng/ml患者,4组为局部晚期患者。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier检验和Log Rank检验。结果:61.8%的患者仅行RP治愈率,38.2%的患者复发。各组间BCR率差异有统计学意义(P = 0.003)。组1、组2、组3、组4 BCR率分别为30.8%、13%、40.8%、70.6%。平均无bcr生存期为82.47±11.64个月。2组BCR-free生存率高于3、4组(P1 = 0.020, P2 = 0.001), 1组BCR-free生存率高于4组(P = 0.016)。3、4组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:尽管成像技术有了发展,tPSA水平升高仍然是无bcr生存的重要预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Female Iliac Vein Variations: Risk of Injury and May-Thurner Syndrome. Recurrence and Survival Rates of Patients Who Undergo Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometrial Carcinoma with Different Prognostic Risk Groups. Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Infants and Toddlers: An Unexplored Area. Predictive Survival Power of Combined Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) and Lymph Node Status in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Open Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Splenectomy and Pericardial Devascularization vs. Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Portal Hypertension and Hypersplenism: A Case-Matched Comparative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1