Do Self-adhesive Resin Composites Release More Monomers? A Comparative High-performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Adhesive Dentistry Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI:10.3290/j.jad.b3240709
Loulwa M Al-Saud, Alhassan H Aodah, Omar A Abu Asab
{"title":"Do Self-adhesive Resin Composites Release More Monomers? A Comparative High-performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis.","authors":"Loulwa M Al-Saud, Alhassan H Aodah, Omar A Abu Asab","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b3240709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To comparatively evaluate the elution of residual monomers (bis-GMA, bis-EMA, TEG-DMA, and HEMA) from two self-adhesive flowable resin composites, a giomer, and a nano-flowable resin composite over five different time intervals, using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four flowable resin composites were investigated (Vertise Flow, Constic, Beautifil Flow Plus F03, and Filtek Z350 XT). Immediately after polymerization, each sample was immersed in 75% ethanol/water solution and stored in amber-colored bottles at room temperature. HPLC analysis was performed at predefined time intervals: 1 h, 24 h, 4 days, 8 days and 16 days. The extraction solution was changed after each analysis. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest mean concentration of residual monomers was eluted from Beautifil, followed by Filtek, and both were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the mean concentration of eluates from self-adhesive resin composites (Vertise Flow and Constic). Vertise Flow released significantly higher concentrations of HEMA than all the other tested materials. At 1 h post-immersion, 52.2% of monomers were eluted, and continued to elute at a reduced rate throughout the study duration. TEG-DMA was the fastest monomer to leach out, while bis-GMA exhibited significantly higher total mean concentration. The elution rate was significantly dependent on the molecular weight of the eluted monomers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No specific elution behavior can be attributed to self-adhesive RBCs. Elution of residual monomers is dependent on each material's composition, resin matrix characteristics, and the monomer's molecular weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":55604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3240709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To comparatively evaluate the elution of residual monomers (bis-GMA, bis-EMA, TEG-DMA, and HEMA) from two self-adhesive flowable resin composites, a giomer, and a nano-flowable resin composite over five different time intervals, using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

Materials and methods: Four flowable resin composites were investigated (Vertise Flow, Constic, Beautifil Flow Plus F03, and Filtek Z350 XT). Immediately after polymerization, each sample was immersed in 75% ethanol/water solution and stored in amber-colored bottles at room temperature. HPLC analysis was performed at predefined time intervals: 1 h, 24 h, 4 days, 8 days and 16 days. The extraction solution was changed after each analysis. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test at p < 0.05.

Results: The highest mean concentration of residual monomers was eluted from Beautifil, followed by Filtek, and both were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the mean concentration of eluates from self-adhesive resin composites (Vertise Flow and Constic). Vertise Flow released significantly higher concentrations of HEMA than all the other tested materials. At 1 h post-immersion, 52.2% of monomers were eluted, and continued to elute at a reduced rate throughout the study duration. TEG-DMA was the fastest monomer to leach out, while bis-GMA exhibited significantly higher total mean concentration. The elution rate was significantly dependent on the molecular weight of the eluted monomers.

Conclusion: No specific elution behavior can be attributed to self-adhesive RBCs. Elution of residual monomers is dependent on each material's composition, resin matrix characteristics, and the monomer's molecular weight.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自粘树脂复合材料会释放出更多单体吗?高效液相色谱比较分析》。
目的:使用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)比较评估两种自粘性可流动树脂复合材料、一种胶体和一种纳米可流动树脂复合材料中残留单体(双-GMA、双-EMA、TEG-DMA 和 HEMA)在五个不同时间间隔内的洗脱情况:研究了四种可流动树脂复合材料(Vertise Flow、Constic、Beautifil Flow Plus F03 和 Filtek Z350 XT)。聚合后,立即将每个样品浸入 75% 的乙醇/水溶液中,并储存在室温下的琥珀色瓶中。高效液相色谱分析在预定的时间间隔内进行:1 小时、24 小时、4 天、8 天和 16 天。每次分析后更换提取液。数据分析采用重复测量方差分析和单因素方差分析,并进行 Tukey 后检验,检验结果为 p <0.05:从 Beautifil 中洗脱出的残留单体平均浓度最高,其次是 Filtek,两者均显著高于自粘树脂复合材料(Vertise Flow 和 Constic)洗脱物的平均浓度(p < 0.05)。Vertise Flow 释放的 HEMA 浓度明显高于所有其他测试材料。浸泡 1 小时后,52.2% 的单体被洗脱出来,并在整个研究期间以较低的速度继续洗脱。TEG-DMA 是洗脱速度最快的单体,而双-GMA 的总平均浓度要高得多。洗脱率在很大程度上取决于洗脱单体的分子量:结论:自粘 RBC 没有特定的洗脱行为。残余单体的洗脱取决于每种材料的成分、树脂基质的特性以及单体的分子量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: New materials and applications for adhesion are profoundly changing the way dentistry is delivered. Bonding techniques, which have long been restricted to the tooth hard tissues, enamel, and dentin, have obvious applications in operative and preventive dentistry, as well as in esthetic and pediatric dentistry, prosthodontics, and orthodontics. The current development of adhesive techniques for soft tissues and slow-releasing agents will expand applications to include periodontics and oral surgery. Scientifically sound, peer-reviewed articles explore the latest innovations in these emerging fields.
期刊最新文献
Preheated Composite as an Alternative for Bonding Feldspathic and Hybrid Ceramics: A Microshear Bond Strength Study. Fourteen-year Clinical Performance of a HEMA-free One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesions. Three-year Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions. Effects of Surface Treatment and Thermocycling on the Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic. Effect of Carbodiimide (EDC) on the Bond Strength Longevity of Epoxy Resin-based Endodontic Sealer to Root Dentin: An In-Vitro Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1