The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pandemic on the Use of Emergency Medical Services System in Bangkok, Thailand.

Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM Pub Date : 2022-08-04 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S375320
Thongpitak Huabbangyang, Satariya Trakulsrichai, Chaiyaporn Yuksen, Pungkava Sricharoen
{"title":"The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pandemic on the Use of Emergency Medical Services System in Bangkok, Thailand.","authors":"Thongpitak Huabbangyang,&nbsp;Satariya Trakulsrichai,&nbsp;Chaiyaporn Yuksen,&nbsp;Pungkava Sricharoen","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S375320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has widely affected the global public health system, especially the emergency medical service (EMS), which has been the first responders since 2020. However, this pandemic persists with still limited studies on its impact on EMS. This study aimed to compare the number of EMS patients and the operation periods of Bangkok EMS in Thailand between 2020 (severe COVID-19 pandemic) and 2019 (prepandemic).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with severe COVID-19 were collected from the emergency medical information system of Bangkok EMS center. Data were compared between the two periods. The COVID-19 pandemic period (study period) spanned from January 01, 2020 to December 31, 2020, whereas the control period referred to the same period in the previous year (January 01, 2019 to December 31, 2019).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 178,594 patients were serviced by EMS, with 93,288 during the study period and 85,306 during the control period. The study period had more EMS patients overall by 9.36% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.16-9.55) and significantly more EMS patients per day, with a mean difference of 21.19 (254.90 ± 25.55 vs 233.71 ± 23.49; 95% CI: 17.63-24.76, p < 0.001), than the control period. Furthermore, all EMS operation periods studied were significantly longer during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During COVID-19 pandemic period, a significantly increased number of EMS patients compared to one during non-COVID-19 pandemic period for both traumatic and non-traumatic patients, as well as remarkably increased every EMS operation period of both groups during COVID-19 pandemic period were found in the present study. From this knowledge, provision of necessary EMS resources and preparation of emergency staff to be ready for management of future pandemics should be obtained to reduce EMS operation period in the future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":503614,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","volume":" ","pages":"429-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f2/34/oaem-14-429.PMC9359499.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S375320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has widely affected the global public health system, especially the emergency medical service (EMS), which has been the first responders since 2020. However, this pandemic persists with still limited studies on its impact on EMS. This study aimed to compare the number of EMS patients and the operation periods of Bangkok EMS in Thailand between 2020 (severe COVID-19 pandemic) and 2019 (prepandemic).

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with severe COVID-19 were collected from the emergency medical information system of Bangkok EMS center. Data were compared between the two periods. The COVID-19 pandemic period (study period) spanned from January 01, 2020 to December 31, 2020, whereas the control period referred to the same period in the previous year (January 01, 2019 to December 31, 2019).

Results: A total of 178,594 patients were serviced by EMS, with 93,288 during the study period and 85,306 during the control period. The study period had more EMS patients overall by 9.36% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.16-9.55) and significantly more EMS patients per day, with a mean difference of 21.19 (254.90 ± 25.55 vs 233.71 ± 23.49; 95% CI: 17.63-24.76, p < 0.001), than the control period. Furthermore, all EMS operation periods studied were significantly longer during the study period.

Conclusion: During COVID-19 pandemic period, a significantly increased number of EMS patients compared to one during non-COVID-19 pandemic period for both traumatic and non-traumatic patients, as well as remarkably increased every EMS operation period of both groups during COVID-19 pandemic period were found in the present study. From this knowledge, provision of necessary EMS resources and preparation of emergency staff to be ready for management of future pandemics should be obtained to reduce EMS operation period in the future pandemics.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病(Covid-19)大流行对泰国曼谷紧急医疗服务系统使用的影响
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)已广泛影响全球公共卫生系统,特别是紧急医疗服务(EMS),自2020年以来一直是第一响应者。然而,这一流行病仍然存在,关于其对EMS影响的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在比较2020年(COVID-19严重大流行)和2019年(大流行前)泰国曼谷EMS的患者数量和运营时间。患者和方法:回顾性分析从曼谷EMS中心紧急医疗信息系统中收集的重症COVID-19患者资料。对两个时期的数据进行了比较。新冠肺炎大流行期(研究期)为2020年1月1日至2020年12月31日,对照组为上一年同期(2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日)。结果:共有178,594例患者接受了EMS服务,其中研究期93,288例,对照组85,306例。研究期间EMS患者总体增加9.36%(95%可信区间[CI]: 9.16-9.55),每天EMS患者显著增加,平均差异为21.19(254.90±25.55 vs 233.71±23.49;95% CI: 17.63 ~ 24.76, p < 0.001),较对照期显著增加。此外,在研究期间,所有研究的EMS操作时间均显着延长。结论:本研究发现,在COVID-19大流行期间,创伤性和非创伤性患者的EMS患者数量均显著高于非COVID-19大流行期间的1例,且两组患者在COVID-19大流行期间的EMS手术次数均显著增加。根据这一认识,应提供必要的EMS资源并培养应急工作人员,为管理未来的大流行病做好准备,以缩短EMS在未来大流行病中的运行时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Iatrogenic Vascular Injuries in Resource-Limited Setting: A 4-Year Experience Monocentric Retrospective Study Missed Opportunity to Diagnose Palliative Care Need Among Older Emergency Department Patients in a Middle-Income Country: A Retrospective Study Post-Traumatic Intracranial Pseudoaneurysm Presenting as Epistaxis Microsurgical Digits Replantation in Resource-Limited Setting: A Retrospective Study High School Student CPR Training in Kuwait: A Cross-Sectional Study of Teacher Perspectives, Willingness, and Perceived Barriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1