Conventional versus Modified Tarso-frontalis Suspension Surgery using Targeted Lid Crease for Simple Congenital Blepharoptosis with Poor Levator Action.

IF 0.3 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.3126/nepjoph.v13i2.32812
Aashish Raj Pant, Rinkal Suwal, Purushottam Joshi, Nisha Shrestha, Ben Limbu
{"title":"Conventional versus Modified Tarso-frontalis Suspension Surgery using Targeted Lid Crease for Simple Congenital Blepharoptosis with Poor Levator Action.","authors":"Aashish Raj Pant,&nbsp;Rinkal Suwal,&nbsp;Purushottam Joshi,&nbsp;Nisha Shrestha,&nbsp;Ben Limbu","doi":"10.3126/nepjoph.v13i2.32812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The routine technique of tarso-frontalis suspension surgery for simple congenital blepharoptosis with poor levator action is cosmetically less rewarding due to either an absence or asymmetry of the postoperative eyelid crease. The objective of this study was to assess the eyelid crease quality after a modified open method of tarso-frontalis suspension surgery compared to the closed method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective comparative study reviewing the case sheets of all the patients undergoing unilateral tarso-frontalis suspension surgery with silicon rod employing Fox pentagon design from September 2017 to February 2019 at Mechi Eye Hospital, Jhapa, Nepal. A review of 40 case sheets of congenital lid ptosis with poor levator function(<4mm) aged 9 years or more was done. Tarso-frontalis suspension surgery, modified with a mini blepharoplasty incision, direct attachment of silicon rod to tarsus, completion of pentagon design with supra-brow incisions, and skin-orbicularis-tarsus-orbicularis-skin suture (open method) was done in 20 cases whereas other 20 cases underwent surgery with supraciliary stab incisions (closed method).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 21.1+5.9 years (range 9-30 years). The ptosis amount ranged from 3-10mm. At the 6th postoperative month, most of the cases had good ptosis correction (90% open group, 85% closed group, p=0.74). However, cosmetic outcomes were better in the open group compared to the closed group: 100% symmetrical eyelid crease compared to 40% (p<0.001) and 90% acceptance rate for eyelid contour compared to 70% (p=0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predictable, targeted, and symmetrical lid crease can be obtained using the modified open method of tarso-frontalis suspension surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":44759,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v13i2.32812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The routine technique of tarso-frontalis suspension surgery for simple congenital blepharoptosis with poor levator action is cosmetically less rewarding due to either an absence or asymmetry of the postoperative eyelid crease. The objective of this study was to assess the eyelid crease quality after a modified open method of tarso-frontalis suspension surgery compared to the closed method.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective comparative study reviewing the case sheets of all the patients undergoing unilateral tarso-frontalis suspension surgery with silicon rod employing Fox pentagon design from September 2017 to February 2019 at Mechi Eye Hospital, Jhapa, Nepal. A review of 40 case sheets of congenital lid ptosis with poor levator function(<4mm) aged 9 years or more was done. Tarso-frontalis suspension surgery, modified with a mini blepharoplasty incision, direct attachment of silicon rod to tarsus, completion of pentagon design with supra-brow incisions, and skin-orbicularis-tarsus-orbicularis-skin suture (open method) was done in 20 cases whereas other 20 cases underwent surgery with supraciliary stab incisions (closed method).

Results: The mean age of the patients was 21.1+5.9 years (range 9-30 years). The ptosis amount ranged from 3-10mm. At the 6th postoperative month, most of the cases had good ptosis correction (90% open group, 85% closed group, p=0.74). However, cosmetic outcomes were better in the open group compared to the closed group: 100% symmetrical eyelid crease compared to 40% (p<0.001) and 90% acceptance rate for eyelid contour compared to 70% (p=0.23).

Conclusion: Predictable, targeted, and symmetrical lid crease can be obtained using the modified open method of tarso-frontalis suspension surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对提上睑肌作用差的单纯性先天性上睑下垂采用常规与改良的睑前肌悬吊手术。
简介:单纯先天性上睑下垂,提上睑肌作用差,常规的睑顶悬吊术由于术后睑折线缺失或不对称,在美容上的效果较差。本研究的目的是评估改良开放睑板-额部悬吊手术后的眼睑折痕质量与封闭方法的比较。材料与方法:回顾性比较分析2017年9月至2019年2月在尼泊尔Jhapa Mechi眼科医院接受Fox五边形设计单侧睑板-额部悬吊手术的所有患者的病例资料。对40例先天性上睑下垂伴提上睑肌功能不佳的病例进行回顾性分析。结果:患者平均年龄21.1岁+5.9岁(范围9-30岁)。上睑下垂量3 ~ 10mm。术后6个月,大部分患者上睑下垂矫正良好(开放组90%,封闭组85%,p=0.74)。然而,与封闭组相比,开放组的美容效果更好:100%对称的眼睑折痕比40%对称的眼睑折痕(结论:采用改良的睑前悬吊术开放方法可以获得可预测的、有针对性的、对称的眼睑折痕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ocular Findings among the Patients of Renal Transplantation Radius-Maumenee Syndrome, A Rare Entity: A Case Report Developing Artificial Intelligence Model for Prediction of Diabetic Retinopathy and Delivering in a real-world Local Context: BP Eye Foundation’s Perspective A Case of Full Thickness Parafoveal Hole Associated with Chorio-Retinal Atrophy Hyperostotic Sphenoid Wing Meningioma with Proptosis: A Rare Case Report with Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1