Optimal Temporal Resolution to Achieve Good Image Quality and Perform Pharmacokinetic Analysis in Free-breathing Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Pancreas.
{"title":"Optimal Temporal Resolution to Achieve Good Image Quality and Perform Pharmacokinetic Analysis in Free-breathing Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Pancreas.","authors":"Kazuki Oyama, Fumihito Ichinohe, Akira Yamada, Yoshihiro Kitoh, Yasuo Adachi, Hayato Hayashihara, Marcel D Nickel, Katsuya Maruyama, Yasunari Fujinaga","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2022-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal temporal resolution for free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (FBDCE-MRI) of the pancreas has not been determined. This study aimed to evaluate the appropriate temporal resolution to achieve good image quality and to perform pharmacokinetic analysis in FBDCE-MRI of the pancreas using golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen participants (53 ± 15 years, eight females) undergoing FBDCE-MRI were included in this prospective study. Images were retrospectively reconstructed at four temporal resolutions (1.8, 3.0, 4.8, and 7.8s). Two radiologists (5 years of experience) evaluated the image quality of each reconstructed image by assessing the visualization of the celiac artery (CEA), the common hepatic artery, the splenic artery, each area of the pancreas, and artifacts using a 5-point scale. Using Tissue-4D, pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for each area in the reconstructed images at each temporal resolution for 16 examinations, excluding two with errors in the pharmacokinetic modeling analysis. Friedman and Bonferroni tests were used for analysis. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During vascular assessment, only scores for the CEA at 7.8s were significantly lower than the other temporal resolutions. Scores of all pancreatic regions and artifacts were significantly lower at 1.8s than at 4.8s and 7.8s. In the pharmacokinetic analysis, all volume transfer coefficients (K<sub>trans</sub>), rate constants (K<sub>ep</sub>), and the initial area under the concentration curve (iAUC) in the pancreatic head and tail were significantly lower at 4.8s and 7.8s than at 1.8s. iAUC in the pancreatic body and extracellular extravascular volume fraction (V<sub>e</sub>) in the pancreatic head were significantly lower at 7.8s than at 1.8s.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A temporal resolution of 3.0s is appropriate to achieve image quality and perform pharmacokinetic analysis in FBDCE-MRI of the pancreas using GRASP.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":"477-485"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/9f/mrms-22-477.PMC10552666.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2022-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Purpose: The optimal temporal resolution for free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (FBDCE-MRI) of the pancreas has not been determined. This study aimed to evaluate the appropriate temporal resolution to achieve good image quality and to perform pharmacokinetic analysis in FBDCE-MRI of the pancreas using golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP).
Methods: Sixteen participants (53 ± 15 years, eight females) undergoing FBDCE-MRI were included in this prospective study. Images were retrospectively reconstructed at four temporal resolutions (1.8, 3.0, 4.8, and 7.8s). Two radiologists (5 years of experience) evaluated the image quality of each reconstructed image by assessing the visualization of the celiac artery (CEA), the common hepatic artery, the splenic artery, each area of the pancreas, and artifacts using a 5-point scale. Using Tissue-4D, pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for each area in the reconstructed images at each temporal resolution for 16 examinations, excluding two with errors in the pharmacokinetic modeling analysis. Friedman and Bonferroni tests were used for analysis. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: During vascular assessment, only scores for the CEA at 7.8s were significantly lower than the other temporal resolutions. Scores of all pancreatic regions and artifacts were significantly lower at 1.8s than at 4.8s and 7.8s. In the pharmacokinetic analysis, all volume transfer coefficients (Ktrans), rate constants (Kep), and the initial area under the concentration curve (iAUC) in the pancreatic head and tail were significantly lower at 4.8s and 7.8s than at 1.8s. iAUC in the pancreatic body and extracellular extravascular volume fraction (Ve) in the pancreatic head were significantly lower at 7.8s than at 1.8s.
Conclusion: A temporal resolution of 3.0s is appropriate to achieve image quality and perform pharmacokinetic analysis in FBDCE-MRI of the pancreas using GRASP.