Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study.

IF 0.6 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.4166/kjg.2022.090
Suh Hyun Choi, Won Eui Yoon, Seung Hyuk Kim, Hee Jun Myung, Seo Hyun Kim, Soon Oh So, Se Hun Kim, Hyun Mi Lee, Yeoun Jung Oh, Jeong Seop Moon, Tae Yeong Park, You Sun Kim
{"title":"Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study.","authors":"Suh Hyun Choi,&nbsp;Won Eui Yoon,&nbsp;Seung Hyuk Kim,&nbsp;Hee Jun Myung,&nbsp;Seo Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Soon Oh So,&nbsp;Se Hun Kim,&nbsp;Hyun Mi Lee,&nbsp;Yeoun Jung Oh,&nbsp;Jeong Seop Moon,&nbsp;Tae Yeong Park,&nbsp;You Sun Kim","doi":"10.4166/kjg.2022.090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Recently, 1-L polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) has been used to reduce the volume of preparation agents in colonoscopy. This clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two types of 1-L PEG-Asc (CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> [Tae Joon Pharmaceutical Company, Seoul, Korea] and Plenvu<sup>®</sup> [Norgine, Harefield, United Kingdom]) in average-aged adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 4 clinical trial. The primary endpoint was the efficacy evaluated using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS), and the secondary endpoint was clinical safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 173 patients were assigned to either the CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> (n=84) or Plenvu<sup>®</sup> (n=89) group. Overall cleansing successes of 97.6% (82/84) and 98.8% (88/89) were achieved in the CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> group and in the Plenvu<sup>®</sup> group, respectively, showing that CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> has similar bowel cleansing efficacy to Plenvu<sup>®</sup> (95% CI, -0.052 to 0.027; p=0.207). The total BBPS score was 8.67±1.00 and 8.70±0.76 in the CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> group and Plenvu<sup>®</sup> group, respectively (p=0.869). The most common adverse symptom was nausea, and no adverse symptoms requiring hospitalization were reported in either group. There were no cases of critical hypernatremia and liver dysfunction exceeding the common terminology criteria for adverse events grade I. An overall satisfaction score (scale of 1 to 10) showed no difference between the two groups (p=0.289). However, the CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> group showed a higher taste satisfaction score (scale of 1 to 5) than the Plenvu<sup>®</sup> group (CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup>: 2.90±0.91, Plenvu<sup>®</sup>: 2.60±0.86, p=0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both types of 1-L PEG-Asc, CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> and Plenvu<sup>®</sup>, are effective and safe bowel cleansing agents in average-aged adults. CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> was preferred in terms of taste satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22736,"journal":{"name":"The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi","volume":"80 2","pages":"85-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2022.090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Recently, 1-L polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) has been used to reduce the volume of preparation agents in colonoscopy. This clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two types of 1-L PEG-Asc (CleanViewAL® [Tae Joon Pharmaceutical Company, Seoul, Korea] and Plenvu® [Norgine, Harefield, United Kingdom]) in average-aged adults.

Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 4 clinical trial. The primary endpoint was the efficacy evaluated using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS), and the secondary endpoint was clinical safety.

Results: In total, 173 patients were assigned to either the CleanViewAL® (n=84) or Plenvu® (n=89) group. Overall cleansing successes of 97.6% (82/84) and 98.8% (88/89) were achieved in the CleanViewAL® group and in the Plenvu® group, respectively, showing that CleanViewAL® has similar bowel cleansing efficacy to Plenvu® (95% CI, -0.052 to 0.027; p=0.207). The total BBPS score was 8.67±1.00 and 8.70±0.76 in the CleanViewAL® group and Plenvu® group, respectively (p=0.869). The most common adverse symptom was nausea, and no adverse symptoms requiring hospitalization were reported in either group. There were no cases of critical hypernatremia and liver dysfunction exceeding the common terminology criteria for adverse events grade I. An overall satisfaction score (scale of 1 to 10) showed no difference between the two groups (p=0.289). However, the CleanViewAL® group showed a higher taste satisfaction score (scale of 1 to 5) than the Plenvu® group (CleanViewAL®: 2.90±0.91, Plenvu®: 2.60±0.86, p=0.028).

Conclusions: Both types of 1-L PEG-Asc, CleanViewAL® and Plenvu®, are effective and safe bowel cleansing agents in average-aged adults. CleanViewAL® was preferred in terms of taste satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种类型的1-L聚乙二醇-抗坏血酸作为结肠镜肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
背景/目的:最近,1-L聚乙二醇抗坏血酸(PEG-Asc)被用于减少结肠镜检查中制剂的体积。本临床试验旨在比较两种类型的1-L PEG-Asc (CleanViewAL®[Tae Joon Pharmaceutical Company, Seoul, Korea]和Plenvu®[Norgine, Harefield, uk])在平均年龄成人中的疗效和安全性。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性、随机、非劣效性、开放标签的4期临床试验。主要终点是使用波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)评估的疗效,次要终点是临床安全性。结果:共有173名患者被分配到CleanViewAL®(n=84)或Plenvu®(n=89)组。CleanViewAL®组和Plenvu®组的总体清洁成功率分别为97.6%(82/84)和98.8%(88/89),表明CleanViewAL®与Plenvu®具有相似的肠道清洁功效(95% CI, -0.052 ~ 0.027;p = 0.207)。CleanViewAL®组BBPS总分为8.67±1.00分,Plenvu®组BBPS总分为8.70±0.76分(p=0.869)。最常见的不良症状为恶心,两组均未出现需要住院治疗的不良症状。无严重高钠血症和肝功能障碍病例超过i级不良事件的通用术语标准。总体满意度评分(1至10分)在两组之间无差异(p=0.289)。然而,CleanViewAL®组的味觉满意度得分(1至5分)高于Plenvu®组(CleanViewAL®:2.90±0.91,Plenvu®:2.60±0.86,p=0.028)。结论:两种类型的1-L PEG-Asc, CleanViewAL®和Plenvu®,在平均年龄的成年人中是有效和安全的肠道清洁剂。在口味满意度方面,CleanViewAL®是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the Efficacy of 12-day Concomitant Quadruple Therapy versus 14-day High dose Dual Therapy as a First-line H. pylori Eradication Regimen. Association between Atherosclerosis and High-Risk Colorectal Adenomas based on Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index and Ankle-Brachial Index. A Case of Esophageal MALT Lymphoma Mimicking a Subepithelial Tumor. Metastatic Melanoma of the Common Bile Duct Presented with Dyspepsia. Successful Transcatheter Arterial Embolization of Abdominal Wall Hematoma from the Left Deep Circumflex Iliac Artery after Abdominal Paracentesis in a Patient with Liver Cirrhosis: Case Report and Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1