Design and Validation of a Self-care Evaluation Instrument to Prevent Diabetic Foot.

Eugenia Del Pilar Herrera Guerra, Lili Rosa Bautista Arellanos
{"title":"Design and Validation of a Self-care Evaluation Instrument to Prevent Diabetic Foot.","authors":"Eugenia Del Pilar Herrera Guerra,&nbsp;Lili Rosa Bautista Arellanos","doi":"10.17533/udea.iee.v40n2e06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This work sought to design and validate a self-care instrument to prevent diabetic foot in Colombian adults with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychometric study in which an instrument was designed to measure self-care to prevent diabetic foot according to the Medium Range Theory of Self-care in chronic diseases. With a sample of 230 people with type-2 diabetes, construct validity was determined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Favorable evidence of construct validity was obtained with a model consisting of three scales: self-care maintenance with a three-factor structure (accumulated variance 43%), α = 0.7, with good fit (𝜒2= 64.698, p = 0.001; RMSEA = 0.066; RMSSR = 0.071; CFI = 0.936, NNFI = 0.910). Monitoring of self-care with presence of symptoms a two-factor structure was found, α = 0.950, with good fit (𝜒2 = 266.837, p = 0.000; RMSEA = 0.321; RMSSR = 0.057; CFI = 0.848; NNFI = 0.789); and without symptoms, a single-factor structure (cumulative variance 84%), α = 0.9, acceptable fit (𝜒2= 377.327, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.355; RMSSR = 0.073; CFI = 0.832; NNFI = 0.764). And self-care management with two-factor structure (cumulative variance 53.7%) α = 0.7, with good fit (𝜒2 = 14.317, p = 0.014; RMSEA = 0.144; RMSSR = 0.063; CFI = 0.905; NNFI = 0.809).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The resulting instrument has adequate psychometric properties, consistent with the theoretical model of self-care in chronic diseases. Its use is recommended to evaluate self-care to prevent diabetic foot in populations similar to the study population.</p>","PeriodicalId":53477,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n2e06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This work sought to design and validate a self-care instrument to prevent diabetic foot in Colombian adults with diabetes.

Methods: Psychometric study in which an instrument was designed to measure self-care to prevent diabetic foot according to the Medium Range Theory of Self-care in chronic diseases. With a sample of 230 people with type-2 diabetes, construct validity was determined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient.

Results: Favorable evidence of construct validity was obtained with a model consisting of three scales: self-care maintenance with a three-factor structure (accumulated variance 43%), α = 0.7, with good fit (𝜒2= 64.698, p = 0.001; RMSEA = 0.066; RMSSR = 0.071; CFI = 0.936, NNFI = 0.910). Monitoring of self-care with presence of symptoms a two-factor structure was found, α = 0.950, with good fit (𝜒2 = 266.837, p = 0.000; RMSEA = 0.321; RMSSR = 0.057; CFI = 0.848; NNFI = 0.789); and without symptoms, a single-factor structure (cumulative variance 84%), α = 0.9, acceptable fit (𝜒2= 377.327, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.355; RMSSR = 0.073; CFI = 0.832; NNFI = 0.764). And self-care management with two-factor structure (cumulative variance 53.7%) α = 0.7, with good fit (𝜒2 = 14.317, p = 0.014; RMSEA = 0.144; RMSSR = 0.063; CFI = 0.905; NNFI = 0.809).

Conclusions: The resulting instrument has adequate psychometric properties, consistent with the theoretical model of self-care in chronic diseases. Its use is recommended to evaluate self-care to prevent diabetic foot in populations similar to the study population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防糖尿病足的自我保健评估仪器的设计与验证。
目的:本研究旨在设计并验证一种自我护理工具,以预防哥伦比亚成人糖尿病患者的糖尿病足。方法:采用心理测量法,根据慢性疾病自我护理中程理论设计一套自我护理预防糖尿病足的测量仪器。以230例2型糖尿病患者为样本,通过探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析确定结构效度。内部一致性用Cronbach’s alpha系数计算。结果:由三个量表组成的模型获得了良好的结构效度证据:自我护理维持具有三因素结构(累积方差43%),α = 0.7,拟合良好(𝜒2= 64.698,p = 0.001;Rmsea = 0.066;RMSSR = 0.071;Cfi = 0.936, nnfi = 0.910)。自我保健监测与症状存在双因素结构,α = 0.950,拟合良好(𝜒2 = 266.837,p = 0.000;Rmsea = 0.321;RMSSR = 0.057;Cfi = 0.848;Nnfi = 0.789);无症状者,单因素结构(累积方差84%),α = 0.9,可接受拟合(𝜒2= 377.327,p < 0.001;Rmsea = 0.355;RMSSR = 0.073;Cfi = 0.832;Nnfi = 0.764)。而自我保健管理具有双因素结构(累积方差53.7%)α = 0.7,拟合良好(𝜒2 = 14.317,p = 0.014;Rmsea = 0.144;RMSSR = 0.063;Cfi = 0.905;Nnfi = 0.809)。结论:所编制的量表具有良好的心理测量特性,符合慢性病患者自我护理的理论模型。建议在与研究人群相似的人群中使用它来评估自我保健以预防糖尿病足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria
Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the journal of Nursing and Education is to present scientific and technical information about health, illnesses and related topics. The journal serves as the conduit [medium] through which the experiences of our own nursing and social science departments can be shared within Columbia and internationally. It is written primarily for nurses, general health practitioners and other related disciplines but can also be used by students and researchers.
期刊最新文献
10.17533/udea.iee.v42n2e16. Advancement in knowledge and skills of nursing students in operation theatre procedures with mobile based learning. Analysis of the Formation of Scientific Communities in the Journal Research and Education in Nursing (2010 - 2020) and its Disciplinary Influence: an Approach from Bibliometric Analysis, Network Analysis, and Natural Language Processing. Development and Evaluation of a Software Designed by a Nursing and Technology Team to Assess the Health Status of Adults over 65 Years of Age. Development and Validation of a questionnaire on human dignity in nursing cares: an exploratory sequential mixed study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1