Reflux Finding Score Using HD Video Chromoendoscopy: A Diagnostic Adjunct in Suspected Laryngopharyngeal Reflux?

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Voice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.06.008
Nurhamizah Mahmud Mohayuddin , Mawaddah Azman , Aneeza Khairiyah Wan Hamizan , Farah Dayana Zahedi , Thomas Leigh Carroll , Marina Mat Baki
{"title":"Reflux Finding Score Using HD Video Chromoendoscopy: A Diagnostic Adjunct in Suspected Laryngopharyngeal Reflux?","authors":"Nurhamizah Mahmud Mohayuddin ,&nbsp;Mawaddah Azman ,&nbsp;Aneeza Khairiyah Wan Hamizan ,&nbsp;Farah Dayana Zahedi ,&nbsp;Thomas Leigh Carroll ,&nbsp;Marina Mat Baki","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span>To explore the use of real-time virtual chromoendoscopy (i-scan) in characterizing the mucosal changes present in subjects with suspected </span>laryngopharyngeal reflux<span> (LPR) and to compare the inter-rater and intra-rater agreement of Reflux Finding Scores (RFS) from both laryngologists and general otolaryngologists (ORL) observing exams using both white light endoscopy (WLE) and i-scan.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a cross-sectional study that included 66 subjects: 46 symptomatic and 20 asymptomatic of suspected LPR based on the reflux symptom index (RSI). Subjects underwent flexible video laryngoscopic evaluation of the larynx utilising both WLE and i-scan during one continuous exam. Subjects also underwent 24-hour oropharyngeal pH-monitoring (Dx-pH). Two laryngologists and two general otolaryngologists evaluated the anonymized videos independently using RFS. Dx-pH results were interpreted using the pH graph, report and RYAN score. Subjects were then designated into one of three groups: no reflux, acid reflux and alkaline reflux.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the symptomatic group, no mucosal irregularities or early mucosal lesions were observed except in one subject who had granulation tissue. The mean RFS using WLE and i-scan were, respectively: 11.8 (SD 6.1) and 11.3 (SD 5.6) in symptomatic and 7.3 (SD 5.7) and 7.3 (SD 5.2) in asymptomatic group. The inter-rater agreement of RFS using WLE and i-scan for both groups were good with intraclass correlation, ICC of 0.84 and 0.88 (laryngologists); and 0.85 and 0.81 (ORL). The intra-rater agreement among all four raters were good to excellent and similar for both WLE and i-scan (ICC of 0.80 to 0.99). 47 of 66 subjects had evidence of LPR on Dx-pH results which more specifically showed 39 subjects had “acid reflux” and 8 had “alkaline reflux”. Sixteen subjects demonstrated a positive RYAN score but showed none were significantly correlated with their RFS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study reports the first utilization of real-time video chromoendoscopy with i-scan technology through high-definition flexible endoscopes to attempt to characterize laryngopharyngeal findings in patients suspected of having LPR. Both general otolaryngologists and laryngologists were equally capable of reliably calculating the RFS using both WLE and i-scan, however no significant improvement in agreement or change in RFS was found when i-scan technology was employed.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level 2</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":"38 6","pages":"Pages 1439-1449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892199722001643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore the use of real-time virtual chromoendoscopy (i-scan) in characterizing the mucosal changes present in subjects with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and to compare the inter-rater and intra-rater agreement of Reflux Finding Scores (RFS) from both laryngologists and general otolaryngologists (ORL) observing exams using both white light endoscopy (WLE) and i-scan.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study that included 66 subjects: 46 symptomatic and 20 asymptomatic of suspected LPR based on the reflux symptom index (RSI). Subjects underwent flexible video laryngoscopic evaluation of the larynx utilising both WLE and i-scan during one continuous exam. Subjects also underwent 24-hour oropharyngeal pH-monitoring (Dx-pH). Two laryngologists and two general otolaryngologists evaluated the anonymized videos independently using RFS. Dx-pH results were interpreted using the pH graph, report and RYAN score. Subjects were then designated into one of three groups: no reflux, acid reflux and alkaline reflux.

Results

For the symptomatic group, no mucosal irregularities or early mucosal lesions were observed except in one subject who had granulation tissue. The mean RFS using WLE and i-scan were, respectively: 11.8 (SD 6.1) and 11.3 (SD 5.6) in symptomatic and 7.3 (SD 5.7) and 7.3 (SD 5.2) in asymptomatic group. The inter-rater agreement of RFS using WLE and i-scan for both groups were good with intraclass correlation, ICC of 0.84 and 0.88 (laryngologists); and 0.85 and 0.81 (ORL). The intra-rater agreement among all four raters were good to excellent and similar for both WLE and i-scan (ICC of 0.80 to 0.99). 47 of 66 subjects had evidence of LPR on Dx-pH results which more specifically showed 39 subjects had “acid reflux” and 8 had “alkaline reflux”. Sixteen subjects demonstrated a positive RYAN score but showed none were significantly correlated with their RFS.

Conclusions

This study reports the first utilization of real-time video chromoendoscopy with i-scan technology through high-definition flexible endoscopes to attempt to characterize laryngopharyngeal findings in patients suspected of having LPR. Both general otolaryngologists and laryngologists were equally capable of reliably calculating the RFS using both WLE and i-scan, however no significant improvement in agreement or change in RFS was found when i-scan technology was employed.

Level of evidence

Level 2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用高清视频色内镜进行反流发现评分:疑似喉咽反流的诊断辅助工具?
目的探讨实时虚拟色内镜(i-scan)在描述疑似喉咽反流(LPR)患者粘膜变化方面的应用,并比较喉科医师和普通耳鼻喉科医师(ORL)在使用白光内镜(WLE)和 i-scan 观察检查时,对反流发现评分(RFS)的评分者间和评分者内的一致性:这是一项横断面研究,包括 66 名受试者:方法:这是一项横断面研究,纳入了 66 名受试者:46 名有症状,20 名无症状,根据反流症状指数 (RSI) 怀疑为 LPR。在一次连续检查中,受试者利用 WLE 和 i-scan 对喉部进行了灵活的视频喉镜评估。受试者还接受了 24 小时口咽 pH 值监测(Dx-pH)。两名喉科专家和两名普通耳鼻喉科专家使用 RFS 独立评估匿名视频。使用 pH 图表、报告和 RYAN 评分解释 Dx-pH 结果。然后将受试者分为三组:无反流组、酸反流组和碱性反流组:在无症状组中,除一名受试者有肉芽组织外,未观察到粘膜不规则或早期粘膜病变。使用 WLE 和 i-scan 的平均 RFS 分别为无症状组为 11.8(标清 6.1)和 11.3(标清 5.6),无症状组为 7.3(标清 5.7)和 7.3(标清 5.2)。两组使用 WLE 和 i-scan 测量 RFS 的评分者间一致性良好,类内相关性(ICC)分别为 0.84 和 0.88(喉科医师);0.85 和 0.81(耳鼻喉科医师)。WLE 和 i-scan 的所有四位评分者的评分内一致性均为良好至优秀,且相似(ICC 为 0.80 至 0.99)。在 66 名受试者中,有 47 名受试者的 Dx-pH 结果显示有 LPR 的证据,更具体地说,39 名受试者有 "酸性反流",8 名受试者有 "碱性反流"。16 名受试者的 RYAN 评分呈阳性,但与 RFS 均无显著相关性:本研究首次报道了通过高清柔性内窥镜使用 i-scan 技术进行实时视频色内镜检查,以尝试确定疑似 LPR 患者喉咽部检查结果的特征。普通耳鼻喉科医师和喉科医师同样能够使用 WLE 和 i-scan 技术可靠地计算 RFS,但在使用 i-scan 技术时,双方的意见一致程度没有显著提高,RFS 也没有发生变化:证据等级:2 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
Optimal Brain Targets for Enhancing Vocal Performance With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. A Multidiscipline Practitioner Pilot Study Into the Potential Professionalization of Singing Voice Rehabilitation Specialists in the United Kingdom. Characterizing Vocal Hyperfunction Using Ecological Momentary Assessment of Relative Fundamental Frequency. Evaluation of Depression and Perceived Voice Handicap Through Self-Report in Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease. Vocal Biomarkers for Parkinson's Disease Classification Using Audio Spectrogram Transformers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1