Epidemiology of cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Australian Defence Force and predictors of outcome.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bmj Military Health Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1136/military-2022-002150
Olivia Williams, V R Ross, C L Lau, H J Mayfield
{"title":"Epidemiology of cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Australian Defence Force and predictors of outcome.","authors":"Olivia Williams, V R Ross, C L Lau, H J Mayfield","doi":"10.1136/military-2022-002150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ability to predict the risk of poor outcome following knee cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Australian Defence Force (ADF) population would help direct individual rehabilitation programmes and workforce planning. This study describes the epidemiology of cruciate ligament reconstruction in the ADF and demonstrates the use of Bayesian networks (BN) to predict the likelihood of fitness for ongoing service under different scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Members who had knee cruciate ligament reconstruction through ADF were identified from billing data and matched to electronic medical records to extract demographic and clinical data. Outcome measure was medical fitness for ADF service up to 24 months after reconstruction. BN models were used to compare outcomes between (1) age groups according to military service, and (2) sexes according to body mass index (BMI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2012 to June 2019, a total of 1199 individuals had knee cruciate ligament reconstruction (average 169 reconstructions/year). Following reconstruction and rehabilitation, 89 (7.4%) were medically unfit for service. Scenario analysis using a tree-augmented naïve BN model showed that, compared with Navy and Air Force, Army members had a higher probability of being unfit in those aged <35 years and a lower probability in those aged ≥35 years. In both sexes, those with obese BMI had the greatest probability of being unfit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While most ADF members were fit for ongoing military service following cruciate ligament reconstruction, service type, age, sex and BMI influenced outcome. BNs provided an interactive and intuitive method to demonstrate the impact of different variables on the outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2022-002150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ability to predict the risk of poor outcome following knee cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Australian Defence Force (ADF) population would help direct individual rehabilitation programmes and workforce planning. This study describes the epidemiology of cruciate ligament reconstruction in the ADF and demonstrates the use of Bayesian networks (BN) to predict the likelihood of fitness for ongoing service under different scenarios.

Methods: Members who had knee cruciate ligament reconstruction through ADF were identified from billing data and matched to electronic medical records to extract demographic and clinical data. Outcome measure was medical fitness for ADF service up to 24 months after reconstruction. BN models were used to compare outcomes between (1) age groups according to military service, and (2) sexes according to body mass index (BMI).

Results: From November 2012 to June 2019, a total of 1199 individuals had knee cruciate ligament reconstruction (average 169 reconstructions/year). Following reconstruction and rehabilitation, 89 (7.4%) were medically unfit for service. Scenario analysis using a tree-augmented naïve BN model showed that, compared with Navy and Air Force, Army members had a higher probability of being unfit in those aged <35 years and a lower probability in those aged ≥35 years. In both sexes, those with obese BMI had the greatest probability of being unfit.

Conclusion: While most ADF members were fit for ongoing military service following cruciate ligament reconstruction, service type, age, sex and BMI influenced outcome. BNs provided an interactive and intuitive method to demonstrate the impact of different variables on the outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚国防军十字韧带重建的流行病学及结果预测。
背景:预测澳大利亚国防军(ADF)中膝关节十字韧带重建后不良后果风险的能力将有助于指导个人康复计划和劳动力规划。本研究描述了澳大利亚国防军中十字韧带重建的流行病学,并展示了如何使用贝叶斯网络(BN)来预测在不同情况下继续服役的可能性:从账单数据中识别出通过 ADF 进行膝关节十字韧带重建的成员,并与电子病历进行比对,以提取人口统计学和临床数据。结果衡量标准是重建后 24 个月内是否适合接受 ADF 服务。使用BN模型比较了(1)根据服兵役情况划分的年龄组和(2)根据体重指数(BMI)划分的性别间的结果:2012年11月至2019年6月,共有1199人进行了膝关节十字韧带重建(平均每年169例)。重建和康复后,有 89 人(7.4%)在医学上不适合服役。使用树状增强的天真 BN 模型进行的情景分析表明,与海军和空军相比,陆军成员在年龄结论中不适合服役的概率更高:虽然大多数澳大利亚国防军成员在十字韧带重建后适合继续服役,但服役类型、年龄、性别和体重指数会影响结果。BNs 提供了一种互动和直观的方法来展示不同变量对结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
期刊最新文献
Removal of tourniquets: the next step in saving lives and limbs. Development and validation of prediction models for prehospital triage of military trauma patients. Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenemase-resistant Enterobacterales in British military cohorts. Importance of strength training for sustaining performance and health in military personnel. Biomechanical and physiological biomarkers are useful indicators of military personnel readiness: a multi-institutional, multinational research collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1