Alan Kawarai Lefor, Saúl Alexis Heredia Pérez, Atsushi Shimizu, Hung-Ching Lin, Jan Witowski, Mamoru Mitsuishi
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Virtual Reality Simulator for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery Training.","authors":"Alan Kawarai Lefor, Saúl Alexis Heredia Pérez, Atsushi Shimizu, Hung-Ching Lin, Jan Witowski, Mamoru Mitsuishi","doi":"10.3390/jcm11144145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The value of kinematic data for skill assessment is being investigated. This is the first virtual reality simulator developed for liver surgery. This simulator was coded in C++ using PhysX and FleX with a novel cutting algorithm and used a patient data-derived model and two instruments functioning as ultrasonic shears. The simulator was evaluated by nine expert surgeons and nine surgical novices. Each participant performed a simulated metastasectomy after training. Kinematic data were collected for the instrument position. Each participant completed a survey. The expert participants had a mean age of 47 years and 9/9 were certified in surgery. Novices had a mean age of 30 years and 0/9 were certified surgeons. The mean path length (novice 0.76 ± 0.20 m vs. expert 0.46 ± 0.16 m, <i>p</i> = 0.008), movements (138 ± 45 vs. 84 ± 32, <i>p</i> = 0.043) and time (174 ± 44 s vs. 102 ± 42 s, <i>p</i> = 0.004) were significantly different for the two participant groups. There were no significant differences in activating the instrument (107 ± 25 vs. 109 ± 53). Participants considered the simulator realistic (6.5/7) (face validity), appropriate for education (5/7) (content validity) with an effective interface (6/7), consistent motion (5/7) and realistic soft tissue behavior (5/7). This study showed that the simulator differentiates between experts and novices. Simulation may be an effective way to obtain kinematic data.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9322966/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The value of kinematic data for skill assessment is being investigated. This is the first virtual reality simulator developed for liver surgery. This simulator was coded in C++ using PhysX and FleX with a novel cutting algorithm and used a patient data-derived model and two instruments functioning as ultrasonic shears. The simulator was evaluated by nine expert surgeons and nine surgical novices. Each participant performed a simulated metastasectomy after training. Kinematic data were collected for the instrument position. Each participant completed a survey. The expert participants had a mean age of 47 years and 9/9 were certified in surgery. Novices had a mean age of 30 years and 0/9 were certified surgeons. The mean path length (novice 0.76 ± 0.20 m vs. expert 0.46 ± 0.16 m, p = 0.008), movements (138 ± 45 vs. 84 ± 32, p = 0.043) and time (174 ± 44 s vs. 102 ± 42 s, p = 0.004) were significantly different for the two participant groups. There were no significant differences in activating the instrument (107 ± 25 vs. 109 ± 53). Participants considered the simulator realistic (6.5/7) (face validity), appropriate for education (5/7) (content validity) with an effective interface (6/7), consistent motion (5/7) and realistic soft tissue behavior (5/7). This study showed that the simulator differentiates between experts and novices. Simulation may be an effective way to obtain kinematic data.
运动数据对技能评估的价值正在研究中。这是第一个为肝脏手术开发的虚拟现实模拟器。该模拟器采用c++语言,使用PhysX和FleX编写,采用一种新颖的切割算法,采用患者数据导出模型和两种仪器作为超声波剪切机。模拟器由9名外科专家和9名外科新手进行评估。每个参与者在训练后都进行了模拟转移切除术。收集了仪器位置的运动学数据。每位参与者都完成了一份调查。专家参与者的平均年龄为47岁,其中9/9获得了外科认证。新手平均年龄为30岁,0/9为持证外科医生。两组平均路径长度(新手0.76±0.20 m vs专家0.46±0.16 m, p = 0.008)、运动(138±45 vs 84±32,p = 0.043)和时间(174±44 s vs 102±42 s, p = 0.004)差异均有统计学意义。两组在器械激活方面无显著差异(107±25 vs 109±53)。参与者认为模拟器逼真(6.5/7)(面部效度),适合教育(5/7)(内容效度),具有有效的界面(6/7),一致的运动(5/7)和真实的软组织行为(5/7)。这项研究表明,模拟器区分专家和新手。仿真可能是获得运动学数据的一种有效方法。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals.
Unique features of this journal:
manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes.
There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.