Validation of the Korean version of the Perinatal Infant Care Social Support scale: a methodological study.

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing Pub Date : 2021-12-31 Epub Date: 2021-12-24 DOI:10.4069/kjwhn.2021.12.12.1
Mihyeon Park, Hyeji Yoo, Sukhee Ahn
{"title":"Validation of the Korean version of the Perinatal Infant Care Social Support scale: a methodological study.","authors":"Mihyeon Park, Hyeji Yoo, Sukhee Ahn","doi":"10.4069/kjwhn.2021.12.12.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Perinatal Infant Care Social Support (K-PICSS) for postpartum mothers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a cross-sectional design. The K-PICSS was developed through forward-backward translation. Online survey data were collected from 284 Korean mothers with infants 1-2 months of age. The 19-item K-PICSS consists of functional and structural domains. The functional domain of social support measures infant care practices of postpartum mothers. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and known-group comparison were used to verify the construct validity of the K-PICSS. Social support and postpartum depression were also measured to test criterion validity. Psychometric testing was not applicable to the structural social support domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of mothers was 32.76±3.34 years, and they had been married for 38.45±29.48 months. Construct validity was supported by the results of EFA, which confirmed a three-factor structure of the scale (informational support, supporting presence, and practical support). Significant correlations of the K-PICSS with social support (r=.71, <i>p</i><.001) and depression (r=-.40, <i>p</i><.001) were found. The K-PICSS showed reliable internal consistency, with Cronbach's α values of .90 overall and .82-.83 in the three subscales. The vast majority of respondents reported that their husband or their parents were their main sources of support for infant care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that the K-PICSS has satisfactory construct validity and reliability to measure infant care social support in Korea.</p>","PeriodicalId":30467,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.12.12.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Perinatal Infant Care Social Support (K-PICSS) for postpartum mothers.

Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design. The K-PICSS was developed through forward-backward translation. Online survey data were collected from 284 Korean mothers with infants 1-2 months of age. The 19-item K-PICSS consists of functional and structural domains. The functional domain of social support measures infant care practices of postpartum mothers. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and known-group comparison were used to verify the construct validity of the K-PICSS. Social support and postpartum depression were also measured to test criterion validity. Psychometric testing was not applicable to the structural social support domain.

Results: The average age of mothers was 32.76±3.34 years, and they had been married for 38.45±29.48 months. Construct validity was supported by the results of EFA, which confirmed a three-factor structure of the scale (informational support, supporting presence, and practical support). Significant correlations of the K-PICSS with social support (r=.71, p<.001) and depression (r=-.40, p<.001) were found. The K-PICSS showed reliable internal consistency, with Cronbach's α values of .90 overall and .82-.83 in the three subscales. The vast majority of respondents reported that their husband or their parents were their main sources of support for infant care.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the K-PICSS has satisfactory construct validity and reliability to measure infant care social support in Korea.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国版围产期婴儿护理社会支持量表的验证:一项方法学研究。
目的:本研究旨在为产后母亲开发并测试韩国版围产期婴儿护理社会支持(K-PICSS)的有效性和可靠性:本研究采用横断面设计。K-PICSS 是通过正向-反向翻译开发的。我们从 284 位有 1-2 个月大婴儿的韩国母亲那里收集了在线调查数据。19 个项目的 K-PICSS 包括功能域和结构域。社会支持功能域测量产后母亲的婴儿护理行为。探索性因子分析(EFA)和已知组比较被用来验证 K-PICSS 的结构效度。此外,还对社会支持和产后抑郁进行了测量,以检验标准效度。心理测试不适用于结构性社会支持领域:母亲的平均年龄为(32.76±3.34)岁,结婚时间为(38.45±29.48)个月。EFA的结果证实了量表的三因素结构(信息支持、支持存在和实际支持),从而支持了结构效度。K-PICSS 与社会支持之间存在显著的相关性(r=.71,ppConclusion):本研究表明,K-PICSS 在测量韩国婴儿护理社会支持方面具有令人满意的建构效度和信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
28
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of suicide statistics and trends between 2011 and 2021 among Korean women An explanatory model of quality of life in high-risk pregnant women in Korea: a structural equation model Authenticity and rizz – What do they have to do with journal editors and researchers? How do mothers with young children perceive endocrine-disrupting chemicals?: an exploratory qualitative study Factors influencing health-related quality of life in older adult women with sarcopenia: analysis of the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1