In search for a neuropsychological marker of ADHD: findings from incidental memory testing.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Archives Italiennes De Biologie Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.12871/000398292022126
G Gronchi, A Peru
{"title":"In search for a neuropsychological marker of ADHD: findings from incidental memory testing.","authors":"G Gronchi,&nbsp;A Peru","doi":"10.12871/000398292022126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper reports on a study where the incidental memory of 18 children with ADHD and 18 typically developing peers was assessed by means of a conventional two-phase recognition memory test. In the study phase participants were required to categorize as a living or non-living a set of 64 stimuli from 8 semantic categories. In the test phase, they were required to recognize \"target\" (i.e., stimuli from the first set) from \"non-target\" stimuli. Children with ADHD were overall less accurate and much slower than TD controls in identifying both living and non-living items. Moreover, while most of TD participants made very few, if any, errors, only 7 out of 18 participants with ADHD scored near ceiling, and 2 of them scored below chance level. Following the Signal Detection Theory approach, the participants' performance on the test phase was scored in terms of d prime (d') values. Children with ADHD had lower d' indexes compared to controls both for living and non-living stimuli, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. More interestingly, the variability of the d' values was higher in the ADHD compared to Controls. Taken together, findings from this study indicate that at least some of the children with ADHD have a genuine impairment in processing visual stimuli. More generally, these results cast doubts on the idea that ADHD represents a stable nosographic entity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55476,"journal":{"name":"Archives Italiennes De Biologie","volume":"160 1-2","pages":"81-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives Italiennes De Biologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12871/000398292022126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports on a study where the incidental memory of 18 children with ADHD and 18 typically developing peers was assessed by means of a conventional two-phase recognition memory test. In the study phase participants were required to categorize as a living or non-living a set of 64 stimuli from 8 semantic categories. In the test phase, they were required to recognize "target" (i.e., stimuli from the first set) from "non-target" stimuli. Children with ADHD were overall less accurate and much slower than TD controls in identifying both living and non-living items. Moreover, while most of TD participants made very few, if any, errors, only 7 out of 18 participants with ADHD scored near ceiling, and 2 of them scored below chance level. Following the Signal Detection Theory approach, the participants' performance on the test phase was scored in terms of d prime (d') values. Children with ADHD had lower d' indexes compared to controls both for living and non-living stimuli, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. More interestingly, the variability of the d' values was higher in the ADHD compared to Controls. Taken together, findings from this study indicate that at least some of the children with ADHD have a genuine impairment in processing visual stimuli. More generally, these results cast doubts on the idea that ADHD represents a stable nosographic entity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找多动症的神经心理学标志:附带记忆测试的结果。
本文采用传统的两阶段识别记忆测试方法,对18名ADHD儿童和18名正常发育的同龄人的附带记忆进行了评估。在研究阶段,参与者被要求从8个语义类别中将64个刺激分类为活的或非活的。在测试阶段,他们被要求识别“目标”(即来自第一组的刺激)和“非目标”刺激。总体而言,ADHD儿童在识别活体和非活体物品方面的准确性较低,而且比TD对照组慢得多。此外,虽然大多数TD参与者犯的错误很少,如果有的话,18名ADHD参与者中只有7人得分接近上限,其中2人得分低于机会水平。根据信号检测理论方法,参与者在测试阶段的表现以d撇(d')值进行评分。与对照组相比,ADHD儿童在活体和非活体刺激方面的d'指数都较低,尽管这种差异没有达到统计学意义。更有趣的是,与对照组相比,ADHD组的d值变异性更高。综上所述,这项研究的结果表明,至少有一些患有多动症的儿童在处理视觉刺激方面确实存在缺陷。更普遍的是,这些结果对ADHD代表一个稳定的医院实体的观点提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives Italiennes De Biologie
Archives Italiennes De Biologie 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
30.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives Italiennes de Biologie - a Journal of Neuroscience- was founded in 1882 and represents one of the oldest neuroscience journals in the world. Archives publishes original contributions in all the fields of neuroscience, including neurophysiology, experimental neuroanatomy and electron microscopy, neurobiology, neurochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, functional brain imaging and behavioral science. Archives Italiennes de Biologie also publishes monographic special issues that collect papers on a specific topic of interest in neuroscience as well as the proceedings of important scientific events. Archives Italiennes de Biologie is published in 4 issues per year and is indexed in the major collections of biomedical journals, including Medline, PubMed, Current Contents, Excerpta Medica.
期刊最新文献
The potential effects of nutrients and light on autophagy-mediated visual function and clearance of retinal aggregates. Effects of thymoquinone on spinal cord injury in rats. Proflactic effects of rosmarinic acid on spinal cord injury in rats. Audiological evaluation of the cochlear nerve with brainstem evoked response audiometry in patients with COVID-19. Evaluation of daily Laurus nobilis tea consumption on anxiety and stress biomarkers in healthy volunteers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1