Stress cardiomyopathy in critical care: A case series of 109 patients.

Parth Pancholi, Nader Emami, Melissa J Fazzari, Sumit Kapoor
{"title":"Stress cardiomyopathy in critical care: A case series of 109 patients.","authors":"Parth Pancholi,&nbsp;Nader Emami,&nbsp;Melissa J Fazzari,&nbsp;Sumit Kapoor","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critically ill patients are at risk of developing stress cardiomyopathy (SC) but can be under-recognized.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe a case series of patients with SC admitted to critical care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study at a tertiary care teaching hospital. All adult (≥ 18 years old) patients admitted to the critical care units with stress cardiomyopathy over 5 years were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 24279 admissions to the critical care units [19139 to medical-surgical intensive care units (MSICUs) and 5140 in coronary care units (CCUs)], 109 patients with SC were identified. Sixty (55%) were admitted to the coronary care units (CCUs) and forty-nine (45%) to the medical-surgical units (MSICUs). The overall incidence of SC was 0.44%, incidence in CCU and MSICU was 1.16% and 0.25% respectively. Sixty-two (57%) had confirmed SC and underwent cardiac catheterization whereas 47 (43%) had clinical SC, and did not undergo cardiac catheterization. Forty-three (72%) patients in the CCUs were diagnosed with primary SC, whereas all (100%) patients in MSICUs developed secondary SC. Acute respiratory failure that required invasive mechanical ventilation and shock developed in twenty-nine (59%) MSICU patients. There were no statistically significant differences in intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, in-hospital mortality, use of inotropic or mechanical circulatory support based on type of unit or anatomical variant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stress cardiomyopathy can be under-recognized in the critical care setting. Intensivists should have a high index of suspicion for SC in patients who develop sudden or worsening unexplained hemodynamic instability, arrhythmias or respiratory failure in ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/3c/WJCCM-11-149.PMC9136722.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Critically ill patients are at risk of developing stress cardiomyopathy (SC) but can be under-recognized.

Aim: To describe a case series of patients with SC admitted to critical care units.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study at a tertiary care teaching hospital. All adult (≥ 18 years old) patients admitted to the critical care units with stress cardiomyopathy over 5 years were included.

Results: Of 24279 admissions to the critical care units [19139 to medical-surgical intensive care units (MSICUs) and 5140 in coronary care units (CCUs)], 109 patients with SC were identified. Sixty (55%) were admitted to the coronary care units (CCUs) and forty-nine (45%) to the medical-surgical units (MSICUs). The overall incidence of SC was 0.44%, incidence in CCU and MSICU was 1.16% and 0.25% respectively. Sixty-two (57%) had confirmed SC and underwent cardiac catheterization whereas 47 (43%) had clinical SC, and did not undergo cardiac catheterization. Forty-three (72%) patients in the CCUs were diagnosed with primary SC, whereas all (100%) patients in MSICUs developed secondary SC. Acute respiratory failure that required invasive mechanical ventilation and shock developed in twenty-nine (59%) MSICU patients. There were no statistically significant differences in intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, in-hospital mortality, use of inotropic or mechanical circulatory support based on type of unit or anatomical variant.

Conclusion: Stress cardiomyopathy can be under-recognized in the critical care setting. Intensivists should have a high index of suspicion for SC in patients who develop sudden or worsening unexplained hemodynamic instability, arrhythmias or respiratory failure in ICU.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护中的应激性心肌病:109例患者的病例系列。
背景:危重患者有发生应激性心肌病(SC)的风险,但可能未被充分认识。目的:描述一系列入住重症监护病房的SC患者的病例。方法:在某三级教学医院进行回顾性观察研究。所有5年以上因应激性心肌病入住重症监护病房的成人(≥18岁)患者均被纳入研究。结果:在24279例重症监护病房(19139例内科外科重症监护病房(MSICUs)和5140例冠状动脉监护病房(CCUs))入院的患者中,109例确诊为SC。60例(55%)入住冠状动脉监护病房(CCUs), 49例(45%)入住内科外科病房(msicu)。SC的总发病率为0.44%,CCU和MSICU的发病率分别为1.16%和0.25%。62例(57%)确诊为SC并接受了心导管插入术,而47例(43%)有临床SC,未接受心导管插入术。43例(72%)ccu患者被诊断为原发性SC,而所有(100%)MSICU患者被诊断为继发性SC。29例(59%)MSICU患者出现急性呼吸衰竭,需要有创机械通气和休克。重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率、住院死亡率、肌力或机械循环支持的使用在单位类型或解剖变异上无统计学显著差异。结论:应激性心肌病在重症监护中可能被低估。重症监护医师应高度怀疑ICU中出现突然或恶化的不明原因血流动力学不稳定、心律失常或呼吸衰竭的SC患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial and synergistic effects of lemongrass and geranium essential oils against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida spp. Driving pressure: A useful tool for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. Early clinical outcomes of two regimens of prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac surgical patients with delayed sternal closure. Impact of different intravenous bolus rates on fluid and electrolyte balance and mortality in critically ill patients. Low T3 vs low T3T4 euthyroid sick syndrome in septic shock patients: A prospective observational cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1