{"title":"Traditional Lecture versus Case-Based Learning in a Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Course within an Integrated Pharmacy Curriculum.","authors":"Riley D Bowers, C Scott Asbill","doi":"10.24926/iip.v13i1.4035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Case-based learning has been shown to increase student perception and performance in multiple topics in pharmacy education. However, no studies have evaluated the impact of virtual patients and case-based learning on student knowledge and knowledge retention of therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing. <b>Innovation</b>: Due to a curriculum overhaul promoting integration and application-based learning, the traditional third-year (P3) therapeutic drug monitoring course was reduced from four (4) credit hours to two (2), in order to add time to pharmacotherapy and skills labs. In order to adapt to this change, the course was shifted to a case-based learning format utilizing virtual patients within a simulated electronic health record (EHR) where the course grade distribution shifted in favor of patient cases versus exam questions. An analysis of student knowledge and knowledge retention of antibiotic dosing and monitoring was conducted comparing students who completed the traditional course versus those who completed the case-based course. <b>Findings</b>: Despite the decrease in credit hours, there was no significant difference shown in the initial knowledge assessment between the traditional and case-based courses (87.0 vs 85.5%). Knowledge retention actually improved in the students who completed the case-based course (78.1% vs 82.5%). <b>Conclusion</b>: Utilizing case-based instruction to teach antibiotic dosing and monitoring was successful in preparing students for these skills during their experiential rotations. Even though students had half the instruction time, they were able to perform calculations and retain knowledge as well as students in the traditional curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":13646,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/34/eb/21550417-13-01-4035.PMC9598975.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i1.4035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Case-based learning has been shown to increase student perception and performance in multiple topics in pharmacy education. However, no studies have evaluated the impact of virtual patients and case-based learning on student knowledge and knowledge retention of therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing. Innovation: Due to a curriculum overhaul promoting integration and application-based learning, the traditional third-year (P3) therapeutic drug monitoring course was reduced from four (4) credit hours to two (2), in order to add time to pharmacotherapy and skills labs. In order to adapt to this change, the course was shifted to a case-based learning format utilizing virtual patients within a simulated electronic health record (EHR) where the course grade distribution shifted in favor of patient cases versus exam questions. An analysis of student knowledge and knowledge retention of antibiotic dosing and monitoring was conducted comparing students who completed the traditional course versus those who completed the case-based course. Findings: Despite the decrease in credit hours, there was no significant difference shown in the initial knowledge assessment between the traditional and case-based courses (87.0 vs 85.5%). Knowledge retention actually improved in the students who completed the case-based course (78.1% vs 82.5%). Conclusion: Utilizing case-based instruction to teach antibiotic dosing and monitoring was successful in preparing students for these skills during their experiential rotations. Even though students had half the instruction time, they were able to perform calculations and retain knowledge as well as students in the traditional curriculum.
背景:基于案例的学习已被证明可以提高学生对药学教育多个主题的认知和表现。然而,没有研究评估虚拟患者和基于案例的学习对学生对治疗药物监测和给药的知识和知识保留的影响。创新:由于课程改革促进了整合和基于应用的学习,传统的第三年(P3)治疗药物监测课程从四(4)学时减少到两(2)学时,以增加药物治疗和技能实验室的时间。为了适应这一变化,课程转变为基于案例的学习格式,在模拟电子健康记录(EHR)中使用虚拟患者,其中课程成绩分布有利于患者病例而不是考试问题。对完成传统课程的学生和完成基于案例的课程的学生进行了对抗生素给药和监测的学生知识和知识保留的分析。结果:尽管学时减少,但传统课程与案例课程的初始知识评估没有显著差异(87.0 vs 85.5%)。在完成案例课程的学生中,知识保留率实际上有所提高(78.1% vs 82.5%)。结论:利用基于案例的教学来教授抗生素给药和监测是成功的,在他们的经验轮转中为学生准备了这些技能。即使学生只有一半的教学时间,他们也能像传统课程的学生一样进行计算和记忆知识。