Improving Appropriate Prescribing For Geriatric Patients Using a Clinical Decision Support System.

Innovations in Pharmacy Pub Date : 2022-04-02 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v13i1.4514
Floor van den Hanenberg, Valentina D Poetsema, Carolina Jpw Keijsers, Jeroen Jma Hendrikx, Jos van Campen, Michiel C Meulendijk, Jelle Tichelaar, Michiel A van Agtmael
{"title":"Improving Appropriate Prescribing For Geriatric Patients Using a Clinical Decision Support System.","authors":"Floor van den Hanenberg,&nbsp;Valentina D Poetsema,&nbsp;Carolina Jpw Keijsers,&nbsp;Jeroen Jma Hendrikx,&nbsp;Jos van Campen,&nbsp;Michiel C Meulendijk,&nbsp;Jelle Tichelaar,&nbsp;Michiel A van Agtmael","doi":"10.24926/iip.v13i1.4514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Polypharmacy is a known risk factor for potentially inappropriate prescribing. Recently there is an increasing interest in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) to improve prescribing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a CDSS, with the START-STOPP criteria as main content in the setting of a geriatric ward. Endpoints were 1) appropriateness of prescribing and 2) acceptance rate of recommendations. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective study comparing the use of a CDSS with usual care involved patients admitted to geriatric wards in two teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were included from January to May 2017. The medications of 64 patients in the first six weeks was assessed according to the current standard, whereas the medications of 61 patients in the second six weeks were also assessed by using a CDSS. Medication appropriateness was assessed with the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). <b>Results:</b> The medications of 125 patients (median age 83 years) were reviewed. In both the usual care group and the intervention group MAI scores decreased significantly from admission to discharge (within group analyses, p<0.001). This effect was significantly larger in the intervention group (p<0.05). MAI scores at discharge in the usual care group and the intervention group were respectively 9.95±6.70 and 7.26±5.07. The CDSS generated 193 recommendations, of which 71 concerned START criteria, 45 STOPP criteria, and 77 potential interactions. Overall, 31.6% of the recommendations were accepted. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study shows that a CDSS to improve prescribing has additional value in the setting of a geriatric ward. Almost one third of the software-generated recommendations were interpreted as clinically relevant and accepted, on average one per patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":13646,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/64/2c/21550417-13-01-4514.PMC9598964.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i1.4514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Polypharmacy is a known risk factor for potentially inappropriate prescribing. Recently there is an increasing interest in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) to improve prescribing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a CDSS, with the START-STOPP criteria as main content in the setting of a geriatric ward. Endpoints were 1) appropriateness of prescribing and 2) acceptance rate of recommendations. Methods: This prospective study comparing the use of a CDSS with usual care involved patients admitted to geriatric wards in two teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were included from January to May 2017. The medications of 64 patients in the first six weeks was assessed according to the current standard, whereas the medications of 61 patients in the second six weeks were also assessed by using a CDSS. Medication appropriateness was assessed with the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). Results: The medications of 125 patients (median age 83 years) were reviewed. In both the usual care group and the intervention group MAI scores decreased significantly from admission to discharge (within group analyses, p<0.001). This effect was significantly larger in the intervention group (p<0.05). MAI scores at discharge in the usual care group and the intervention group were respectively 9.95±6.70 and 7.26±5.07. The CDSS generated 193 recommendations, of which 71 concerned START criteria, 45 STOPP criteria, and 77 potential interactions. Overall, 31.6% of the recommendations were accepted. Conclusion: This study shows that a CDSS to improve prescribing has additional value in the setting of a geriatric ward. Almost one third of the software-generated recommendations were interpreted as clinically relevant and accepted, on average one per patient.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用临床决策支持系统改善老年患者的适当处方。
目的:多种用药是已知的潜在不当处方的危险因素。最近有越来越多的兴趣临床决策支持系统(CDSS),以改善处方。本研究的目的是评估CDSS的影响,以start - stop标准为主要内容,在老年病房的设置。终点为1)处方的适宜性和2)推荐的接受率。方法:这项前瞻性研究比较了CDSS与常规护理的使用,涉及荷兰两家教学医院老年病房收治的患者。患者于2017年1月至5月纳入。64例患者前6周的用药按照现行标准进行评估,61例患者后6周的用药也采用CDSS进行评估。采用药物适宜性指数(MAI)评估药物适宜性。结果:回顾性分析125例患者的用药情况,中位年龄83岁。在常规护理组和干预组中,MAI评分从入院到出院均显著下降(组内分析,p)。结论:本研究表明,CDSS改善处方在老年病房的设置中具有额外的价值。几乎三分之一的软件生成的建议被解释为临床相关并被接受,平均每个患者一个。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Pharmacy Entrustable Professional Activities Strategies Proposed by Students and Pharmacists for Virtual Experiential Patient Care Practicums In-class Exercises Regarding the Roles of Excipients in a Pharmaceutics Course The Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Treating Patients with Escherichia coli Bacteremia in a Small Single Center Community Hospital Development and Pilot Testing of the OTC Coach Software to Support Student Pharmacist Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1