Slouched and Erect Sitting Postures Affect Upper Limb Maximum Voluntary Force Levels and Fatiguability: A Randomized Experimental Study.

Aurélie Tomezzoli, Bertrand Fréchède, Sonia Duprey
{"title":"Slouched and Erect Sitting Postures Affect Upper Limb Maximum Voluntary Force Levels and Fatiguability: A Randomized Experimental Study.","authors":"Aurélie Tomezzoli,&nbsp;Bertrand Fréchède,&nbsp;Sonia Duprey","doi":"10.1080/24725838.2022.2110544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSModifying the spinal curvature is an empirical approach to treating upper limb musculoskeletal disorders, often attributed to the balance between physical stress and individual functional capacities. We completed an experimental biomechanical study to quantify the effect of seated spinal posture on upper limb functional capacities. Isometric maximum muscle voluntary forces (MVFs) were measured at participants' shoulder, elbow, and wrist. Fatiguability was also assessed during a repetitive painting task. Participants were asked to assume both slouched and erect spinal postures, in a random order. In the erect posture, participants achieved higher shoulder and elbow isometric MVF levels and took longer to reach a fatigue threshold. Thus, spinal posture tends to remotely influence upper limb functional capacities, especially at the shoulder and elbow. Ergonomists should consider spinal posture even when focusing on musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.</p>","PeriodicalId":73332,"journal":{"name":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":" ","pages":"142-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2022.2110544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSModifying the spinal curvature is an empirical approach to treating upper limb musculoskeletal disorders, often attributed to the balance between physical stress and individual functional capacities. We completed an experimental biomechanical study to quantify the effect of seated spinal posture on upper limb functional capacities. Isometric maximum muscle voluntary forces (MVFs) were measured at participants' shoulder, elbow, and wrist. Fatiguability was also assessed during a repetitive painting task. Participants were asked to assume both slouched and erect spinal postures, in a random order. In the erect posture, participants achieved higher shoulder and elbow isometric MVF levels and took longer to reach a fatigue threshold. Thus, spinal posture tends to remotely influence upper limb functional capacities, especially at the shoulder and elbow. Ergonomists should consider spinal posture even when focusing on musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
懒散和直立坐姿影响上肢最大自主力水平和疲劳:一项随机实验研究。
改善脊柱曲度是治疗上肢肌肉骨骼疾病的经验方法,通常归因于身体压力和个人功能能力之间的平衡。我们完成了一项实验性生物力学研究,以量化脊柱坐姿对上肢功能能力的影响。在参与者的肩膀、肘部和手腕处测量了等长最大肌肉自主力(MVFs)。在重复的绘画任务中也评估了疲劳性。参与者被要求按照随机顺序采取懒散和直立的脊柱姿势。在直立姿势下,参与者获得更高的肩部和肘部等距MVF水平,并且需要更长的时间才能达到疲劳阈值。因此,脊柱姿势倾向于远程影响上肢的功能能力,特别是在肩部和肘部。人类工效学家即使在关注上肢肌肉骨骼疾病时也应该考虑脊柱姿势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Iterative Design Method for Advancing Air Traffic Control and Management Training Through Immersive VFR 3D Map Visualization. Wearable Technology Hesitancy in Industrial Applications. Investigating Safety Awareness in Assembly Operations via Mixed Reality Technology. Strategies to Reduce Fall Severity after a Perturbation during Ladder Climbing. Gender Swap in Virtual Reality for Supporting Inclusion and Implications in the Workplace.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1