Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Libyan Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/19932820.2022.2140473
Dhekra Chebil, Donia Ben Hassine, Sarra Melki, Sarra Nouira, Wafa Kammoun Rebai, Hajer Hannachi, Latifa Merzougui, Ahmed Ben Abdelaziz
{"title":"Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review.","authors":"Dhekra Chebil, Donia Ben Hassine, Sarra Melki, Sarra Nouira, Wafa Kammoun Rebai, Hajer Hannachi, Latifa Merzougui, Ahmed Ben Abdelaziz","doi":"10.1080/19932820.2022.2140473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distancing is one of the barrier measures in mitigating epidemics. We aimed to investigate the typology, effectiveness, and side effects of distancing rules during epidemics. Electronic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed in April 2020, using Mesh-Terms representing various forms of distancing ('social isolation', 'social distancing', 'quarantine') combining with 'epidemics'. PRISMA-ScR statement was consulted to report this review. A total of 314 titles were identified and 93 were finally included. 2009 influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 epidemics were the most studied. Distancing measures were mostly classified as case-based and community-based interventions. The combination of distancing rules, like school closure, home working, isolation and quarantine, has proven to be effective in reducing R<sub>0</sub> and flattening the epidemic curve, also when initiated early at a high rate and combined with other non-pharmaceutical interventions. Epidemiological and modeling studies showed that Isolation and quarantine in the 2009 Influenza pandemic were effective measures to decrease attack rate also with high level of compliance but there was an increased risk of household transmission. lockdown was also effective to reduce R<sub>0</sub> from 2.6 to 0.6 and to increase doubling time from 2 to 4 days in the covid-19 pandemic. The evidence for school closure and workplace distancing was moderate as single intervention. Psychological disorder, unhealthy behaviors, disruption of economic activities, social discrimination, and stigmatization were the main side effects of distancing measures. Earlier implementation of combined distancing measures leads to greater effectiveness in containing outbreaks. Their indication must be relevant and based on evidence to avoid adverse effects on the community. These results would help decision-makers to develop response plans based on the required experience and strengthen the capacity of countries to fight against future epidemics. <b>Mesh words</b>: Physical Distancing, Quarantine, Epidemics, Public Health, Scoping Review.</p>","PeriodicalId":49910,"journal":{"name":"Libyan Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/58/05/ZLJM_17_2140473.PMC9639554.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libyan Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2022.2140473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distancing is one of the barrier measures in mitigating epidemics. We aimed to investigate the typology, effectiveness, and side effects of distancing rules during epidemics. Electronic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed in April 2020, using Mesh-Terms representing various forms of distancing ('social isolation', 'social distancing', 'quarantine') combining with 'epidemics'. PRISMA-ScR statement was consulted to report this review. A total of 314 titles were identified and 93 were finally included. 2009 influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 epidemics were the most studied. Distancing measures were mostly classified as case-based and community-based interventions. The combination of distancing rules, like school closure, home working, isolation and quarantine, has proven to be effective in reducing R0 and flattening the epidemic curve, also when initiated early at a high rate and combined with other non-pharmaceutical interventions. Epidemiological and modeling studies showed that Isolation and quarantine in the 2009 Influenza pandemic were effective measures to decrease attack rate also with high level of compliance but there was an increased risk of household transmission. lockdown was also effective to reduce R0 from 2.6 to 0.6 and to increase doubling time from 2 to 4 days in the covid-19 pandemic. The evidence for school closure and workplace distancing was moderate as single intervention. Psychological disorder, unhealthy behaviors, disruption of economic activities, social discrimination, and stigmatization were the main side effects of distancing measures. Earlier implementation of combined distancing measures leads to greater effectiveness in containing outbreaks. Their indication must be relevant and based on evidence to avoid adverse effects on the community. These results would help decision-makers to develop response plans based on the required experience and strengthen the capacity of countries to fight against future epidemics. Mesh words: Physical Distancing, Quarantine, Epidemics, Public Health, Scoping Review.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉开距离措施在遏制流行病中的作用:范围审查。
拉开距离是缓解流行病的屏障措施之一。我们旨在调查流行病期间拉开距离规则的类型、有效性和副作用。我们于 2020 年 4 月在 MEDLINE、PubMed 上进行了电子检索,使用了代表各种疏远形式("社会隔离"、"社会疏远"、"隔离")并与 "流行病 "相结合的 Mesh-Terms。报告本综述时参考了 PRISMA-ScR 声明。共确定了 314 个标题,最终纳入 93 个标题。研究最多的是 2009 年甲型流感和 SARS-CoV-2 流行病。拉开距离的措施主要分为基于病例的干预措施和基于社区的干预措施。事实证明,将学校关闭、在家工作、隔离和检疫等疏远规则结合起来,可有效降低 R0,使疫情曲线趋于平缓,在早期高比例启动并与其他非药物干预措施相结合时也是如此。流行病学和模型研究表明,在 2009 年流感大流行中,隔离和检疫是降低发病率的有效措施,遵守率也很高,但家庭传播的风险增加。作为单一干预措施,关闭学校和远离工作场所的效果一般。心理失调、不健康行为、经济活动中断、社会歧视和污名化是拉开距离措施的主要副作用。尽早实施综合疏远措施能更有效地遏制疫情爆发。为避免对社区造成不利影响,这些措施必须有针对性,并以证据为基础。这些结果将有助于决策者根据所需的经验制定应对计划,并加强各国应对未来流行病的能力。关键词物理隔离、检疫、流行病、公共卫生、范围审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Libyan Journal of Medicine
Libyan Journal of Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Libyan Journal of Medicine (LJM) is a peer-reviewed, Open Access, international medical journal aiming to promote heath and health education by publishing high-quality medical research in the different disciplines of medicine. LJM was founded in 2006 by a group of enthusiastic Libyan medical scientists who looked at the contribution of Libyan publications to the international medical literature and saw that a publication outlet was missing. To fill this gap they launched LJM as a tool for transferring current medical knowledge to and from colleagues in developing countries, particularly African countries, as well as internationally.The journal is still led by a group of Libyan physicians inside and outside Libya, but it also enjoys support and recognition from the international medical community.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Ramadan on cognitive functions in young boys. Factors influencing fatigue among patients undergoing hemodialysis: a multi-center cross-sectional study. Satisfaction with telemedicine use during COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a systematic review. Radiographic evaluation of teeth with pulp stones and pulp canal obliteration: characteristics, and associations with dental parameters. The role of human rhinovirus in COPD exacerbations in Abu Dhabi: molecular epidemiology and clinical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1