Dental implant healing abutment decontamination: A systematic review of in vitro studies.

Thiha Tin Kyaw, Ahmed Abdou, Hidemi Nakata, Atiphan Pimkhaokham
{"title":"Dental implant healing abutment decontamination: A systematic review of in vitro studies.","authors":"Thiha Tin Kyaw,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdou,&nbsp;Hidemi Nakata,&nbsp;Atiphan Pimkhaokham","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate various cleaning protocols employed to enable the reuse of healing abutments in the past decade.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The review followed the guidelines set out in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, with guidance from the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Electronic searching and handsearching were performed using the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE via PubMed) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2010 to July 2022, respectively. Studies published in English were evaluated. Two independent examiners conducted the search and the review process. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 178 articles were evaluated for review, but only 15 of them were selected for full-text reading. Regarding cleaning efficacy, chemical decontamination using sodium hypochlorite produced better results than laser and mechanical decontamination with airflow. Similar efficacy was found between chemical and electrochemical decontamination. Combined use of chemical and electrochemical decontamination protocols demonstrated the greatest efficacy. Chemical and electrochemical decontamination methods were found to achieve better outcomes in preserving the surface properties of decontaminated healing abutments than laser and mechanical methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present review found that combined decontamination protocols (chemical, electrochemical processing and autoclave treatment) are favourable for obtaining healing abutments with optimally cleaned surfaces. Moreover, healing abutments located in an area that is difficult to access can be cleaned without affecting the surface properties. This information could benefit researchers and clinicians when multiple-use healing abutments are considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate various cleaning protocols employed to enable the reuse of healing abutments in the past decade.

Materials and methods: The review followed the guidelines set out in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, with guidance from the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Electronic searching and handsearching were performed using the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE via PubMed) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2010 to July 2022, respectively. Studies published in English were evaluated. Two independent examiners conducted the search and the review process. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated.

Results: In total, 178 articles were evaluated for review, but only 15 of them were selected for full-text reading. Regarding cleaning efficacy, chemical decontamination using sodium hypochlorite produced better results than laser and mechanical decontamination with airflow. Similar efficacy was found between chemical and electrochemical decontamination. Combined use of chemical and electrochemical decontamination protocols demonstrated the greatest efficacy. Chemical and electrochemical decontamination methods were found to achieve better outcomes in preserving the surface properties of decontaminated healing abutments than laser and mechanical methods.

Conclusion: The present review found that combined decontamination protocols (chemical, electrochemical processing and autoclave treatment) are favourable for obtaining healing abutments with optimally cleaned surfaces. Moreover, healing abutments located in an area that is difficult to access can be cleaned without affecting the surface properties. This information could benefit researchers and clinicians when multiple-use healing abutments are considered.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙种植愈合基台去污:体外研究的系统回顾。
目的:探讨近十年来用于修复基牙的各种清洁方案。材料和方法:本综述遵循《系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目》中列出的指南,并参考Cochrane协作手册。2010年1月至2022年7月,分别使用美国国家医学图书馆(MEDLINE via PubMed)和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials进行电子检索和手工检索。对以英语发表的研究进行了评估。两名独立审查员进行了搜索和审查过程。对纳入研究的偏倚风险进行评估。结果:共有178篇文章被评估审阅,但只有15篇文章被选为全文阅读。在清洁效果方面,次氯酸钠化学去污效果优于激光和气流机械去污。化学去污和电化学去污的效果相似。化学和电化学净化方案的联合使用显示出最大的效果。化学和电化学去污方法比激光和机械方法能更好地保持去污修复基台的表面特性。结论:本综述发现联合去污方案(化学,电化学处理和高压釜处理)有利于获得具有最佳清洁表面的愈合基牙。此外,位于难以接近区域的愈合基台可以在不影响表面性能的情况下进行清洁。当考虑多用途愈合基台时,这些信息可以使研究人员和临床医生受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A 360-degree extraction socket classification for immediate dentoalveolar restoration. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of guided bone regeneration with polytetrafluoroethylene titanium-reinforced membranes, CAD/CAM semi-occlusive titanium meshes and CAD/CAM occlusive titanium foils in partially atrophic arches. Bone augmentation using titanium mesh: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical and histological efficacy of a new implant surface in achieving early and stable osseointegration: An in vivo study. Crown-to-implant ratio: A misnomer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1