Analyzing Mortality And The Effect Of Early Excision As A Preliminary Treatment Of Acute Burn Patients In A Limited Resource Setting Using LA50 As An Outcome Measurement.

Q3 Medicine Annals of burns and fire disasters Pub Date : 2022-06-30
A N Syarif, F Afira, A Wardhana, A Ramadhan
{"title":"Analyzing Mortality And The Effect Of Early Excision As A Preliminary Treatment Of Acute Burn Patients In A Limited Resource Setting Using LA50 As An Outcome Measurement.","authors":"A N Syarif,&nbsp;F Afira,&nbsp;A Wardhana,&nbsp;A Ramadhan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in burn care have led to an overall improvement in mortality in high-income countries, but in low-middle income countries mortality remains relatively high. In a limited resource setting where temporary wound closure options were unavailable, it was determined whether early excision as a preliminary treatment could improve prognosis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Burn Unit to evaluate the outcomes of acute burn patients admitted from January 2013 to December 2018 using mortality and lethal area 50 (LA50), and to compare the outcomes between groups who underwent early excision without skin graft (EEWG), early excision with skin graft (EESG), delayed excision without skin graft (DEWG), or delayed excision with skin graft (DESG). Out of 390 patients available for screening, 256 were eligible for further study. The overall mortality was 17.9% with an increase linear with age and total body surface area (TBSA). The overall LA50 was 49%. Preliminary data showed the highest percentage of deaths in the no treatment group, with no deaths seen in treatment groups EESG and DESG. The odds ratio for mortality in the EEWG group was 2.11 (p-value 0.201, CI95% = 0.65-6.80) compared to the DEWG group. LA50 is more objective compared to crude mortality and enables future internal and external comparison. The highest mortality was in the no treatment group with mortality in the EEWG group higher than in the DEWG, but not statistically different. Early excision without skin grafting as a preliminary procedure may still be considered in a limited resource setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":8392,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9416685/pdf/Ann-Burns-and-Fire-Disasters-35-125.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in burn care have led to an overall improvement in mortality in high-income countries, but in low-middle income countries mortality remains relatively high. In a limited resource setting where temporary wound closure options were unavailable, it was determined whether early excision as a preliminary treatment could improve prognosis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Burn Unit to evaluate the outcomes of acute burn patients admitted from January 2013 to December 2018 using mortality and lethal area 50 (LA50), and to compare the outcomes between groups who underwent early excision without skin graft (EEWG), early excision with skin graft (EESG), delayed excision without skin graft (DEWG), or delayed excision with skin graft (DESG). Out of 390 patients available for screening, 256 were eligible for further study. The overall mortality was 17.9% with an increase linear with age and total body surface area (TBSA). The overall LA50 was 49%. Preliminary data showed the highest percentage of deaths in the no treatment group, with no deaths seen in treatment groups EESG and DESG. The odds ratio for mortality in the EEWG group was 2.11 (p-value 0.201, CI95% = 0.65-6.80) compared to the DEWG group. LA50 is more objective compared to crude mortality and enables future internal and external comparison. The highest mortality was in the no treatment group with mortality in the EEWG group higher than in the DEWG, but not statistically different. Early excision without skin grafting as a preliminary procedure may still be considered in a limited resource setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在资源有限的情况下,使用LA50作为结果测量分析急性烧伤患者早期切除作为初步治疗的死亡率和效果。
烧伤护理方面的进步使高收入国家的死亡率总体上有所改善,但在中低收入国家,死亡率仍然相对较高。在资源有限且无法获得临时伤口闭合选择的情况下,确定早期切除作为初步治疗是否可以改善预后。在Cipto Mangunkusumo医院烧伤科进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以死亡率和致死面积50 (LA50)评估2013年1月至2018年12月入院的急性烧伤患者的结局,并比较早期不移植皮肤切除术(EEWG)、早期移植皮肤切除术(EESG)、延迟不移植皮肤切除术(DEWG)或延迟移植皮肤切除术(DESG)组的结局。在390名可进行筛查的患者中,256名符合进一步研究的条件。总死亡率为17.9%,随年龄和总体表面积(TBSA)呈线性增长。总体LA50为49%。初步数据显示,未治疗组的死亡率最高,治疗组EESG和DESG中未见死亡。与DEWG组相比,EEWG组死亡率的优势比为2.11 (p值0.201,CI95% = 0.65-6.80)。与粗死亡率相比,LA50更为客观,便于日后进行内外比较。未治疗组死亡率最高,EEWG组死亡率高于DEWG组,但无统计学差异。在资源有限的情况下,早期切除不植皮作为初步手术仍可考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of burns and fire disasters
Annals of burns and fire disasters Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: "Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters" is the official publication of the Euro-Mediterranean Council for Burns and Fire Disasters (MBC) and the European Burns Association (EBA). It is a peer-reviewed journal directed to an audience of medical as well as paramedical personnel involved in the management of burn injuries. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research, scientific advances. It publishes also selected abstracts from international journals.
期刊最新文献
MBC Report. SFB. Investigation Of Common Burn Mechanisms, And Training And Safety Conditions In The Workplace. Brûlure Et Atteinte Oculaire: Incidence, Facteurs De Risque Et Pronostic. Brûlures Profondes Des Membres Inférieurs Chez Les Patients Diabétiques: À Propos De 30 Cas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1