Use of a Portable Electronic Interface Improves Clinical Handoffs and Adherence to Lung Protective Ventilation.

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2022-08-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S372333
Neil R Euliano, Paul Stephan, Konstantinos Michalopoulos, Michael A Gentile, A Joseph Layon, Andrea Gabrielli
{"title":"Use of a Portable Electronic Interface Improves Clinical Handoffs and Adherence to Lung Protective Ventilation.","authors":"Neil R Euliano, Paul Stephan, Konstantinos Michalopoulos, Michael A Gentile, A Joseph Layon, Andrea Gabrielli","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S372333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical ventilation (MV) is used to support patients with respiratory impairment. Evidence supports the use of lung-protective ventilation (LPV) during MV to improve outcomes. However, studies have demonstrated poor adherence to LPV guidelines. We hypothesized that an electronic platform adapted to a hand-held tablet receiving real-time ventilatory parameters could increase clinician awareness of key LPV parameters. Furthermore, we speculated that an electronic shift-change tool could improve the quality of clinician handoffs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a specially designed Wi-Fi dongle to transmit data from three ventilators and a respiratory monitor, we implemented a system that displays data from all ventilators under the care of a Respiratory Care Practitioner (RCP) on an electronic tablet. In addition, the tablet created a handoff checklist to improve shift-change communication. In a simulated ICU environment, we monitored the performance of eight RCPs at baseline and while using the system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the system, the time above guideline Pplat decreased by 74% from control, and the time outside the VT range decreased by 60% from control, p = 0.007 and 0.015, respectively. The handoff scores improved quality significantly from 2.8 to 1.6 on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being best), p = 0.03.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a simulated environment, an electronic RT tool can significantly improve shift-change communication and increase the RCP's level of LPV adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":" ","pages":"263-275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/33/48/mder-15-263.PMC9362905.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S372333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is used to support patients with respiratory impairment. Evidence supports the use of lung-protective ventilation (LPV) during MV to improve outcomes. However, studies have demonstrated poor adherence to LPV guidelines. We hypothesized that an electronic platform adapted to a hand-held tablet receiving real-time ventilatory parameters could increase clinician awareness of key LPV parameters. Furthermore, we speculated that an electronic shift-change tool could improve the quality of clinician handoffs.

Methods: Using a specially designed Wi-Fi dongle to transmit data from three ventilators and a respiratory monitor, we implemented a system that displays data from all ventilators under the care of a Respiratory Care Practitioner (RCP) on an electronic tablet. In addition, the tablet created a handoff checklist to improve shift-change communication. In a simulated ICU environment, we monitored the performance of eight RCPs at baseline and while using the system.

Results: Using the system, the time above guideline Pplat decreased by 74% from control, and the time outside the VT range decreased by 60% from control, p = 0.007 and 0.015, respectively. The handoff scores improved quality significantly from 2.8 to 1.6 on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being best), p = 0.03.

Conclusion: In a simulated environment, an electronic RT tool can significantly improve shift-change communication and increase the RCP's level of LPV adherence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用便携式电子界面可改善临床交接和坚持肺保护性通气。
背景:机械通气(MV)用于支持呼吸功能受损的患者。有证据支持在机械通气过程中使用肺保护通气(LPV)来改善治疗效果。然而,研究表明,对 LPV 指南的遵守情况很差。我们假设,一个可接收实时通气参数的手持平板电脑电子平台可提高临床医生对关键 LPV 参数的认识。此外,我们还推测电子换班工具可以提高临床医生的交接班质量:我们使用专门设计的 Wi-Fi 加密狗传输来自三台呼吸机和一台呼吸监护仪的数据,并在电子平板电脑上显示呼吸护理医师 (RCP) 所护理的所有呼吸机的数据。此外,平板电脑还创建了一份交接清单,以改善换班沟通。在模拟的重症监护室环境中,我们监测了八名呼吸护理执业医师在基线和使用该系统时的表现:结果:使用该系统后,高于指导 Pplat 的时间比对照组减少了 74%,超出 VT 范围的时间比对照组减少了 60%,p = 0.007 和 0.015。在 1 到 5 的评分中,交接评分从 2.8 显著提高到 1.6(1 为最佳),p = 0.03:结论:在模拟环境中,电子 RT 工具可显著改善交班沟通,提高 RCP 的 LPV 依从性水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Initial Validation of the NOL Nociception Level Index® Monitoring System in Black and Multiracial People. Potential of Aluminum Drug Packages with Press-Through Packaging Considering Usability for a Wide Range of Users. The Application Effect of Fine Management Combined with Man-Machine Fixation Mode in Reducing the Attrition Rate of Laparoscopic Instruments-A Non-Randomized, Concurrent Controlled Study. Patients with Growth-Related Disorders and Caregivers Prefer the Somapacitan Device to the Somatrogon Device: Results from a Randomized Crossover Study Assessing Device Preference and Ease of Use Following Simulated Injections. May Glymphatic Drainage Improve Life Quality in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Outpatients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1