Didactic Physician Assistant Students' Perceptions of Evidence-Based Medicine Resources: A Preliminary Investigation.

Brittany R Heer, Chris Gillette, Christopher Roman, M Jane McDaniel
{"title":"Didactic Physician Assistant Students' Perceptions of Evidence-Based Medicine Resources: A Preliminary Investigation.","authors":"Brittany R Heer,&nbsp;Chris Gillette,&nbsp;Christopher Roman,&nbsp;M Jane McDaniel","doi":"10.1080/02763869.2022.2131138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) instruction is required for physician Assistant (PA) students. This pilot study surveyed didactic PA students at three geographically diverse PA programs at the end of their didactic EBM course to understand which attributes of EBM resources they find most and least useful, and their self-efficacy in searching and appraising medical literature. Thematic analysis identified the most important student-reported attributes of a resource. PA students in this sample preferred UpToDate and PubMed as their top EBM tools based on attribute ratings. However, each database included in this pilot study received positive feedback, despite a low usage rate across institutions. The most important attributes were ease of use/search, information presentation, and conclusion/critical appraisal skill. After one EBM course, on average, students rated their self-efficacy searching the literature and appraising the literature as \"moderately confident.\" This suggests that instructors and librarians have an opportunity to expose students to more tools as well as encourage \"the right tool for the right job.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":39720,"journal":{"name":"Medical Reference Services Quarterly","volume":"41 4","pages":"347-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Reference Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2022.2131138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) instruction is required for physician Assistant (PA) students. This pilot study surveyed didactic PA students at three geographically diverse PA programs at the end of their didactic EBM course to understand which attributes of EBM resources they find most and least useful, and their self-efficacy in searching and appraising medical literature. Thematic analysis identified the most important student-reported attributes of a resource. PA students in this sample preferred UpToDate and PubMed as their top EBM tools based on attribute ratings. However, each database included in this pilot study received positive feedback, despite a low usage rate across institutions. The most important attributes were ease of use/search, information presentation, and conclusion/critical appraisal skill. After one EBM course, on average, students rated their self-efficacy searching the literature and appraising the literature as "moderately confident." This suggests that instructors and librarians have an opportunity to expose students to more tools as well as encourage "the right tool for the right job."

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学医师助理学生对循证医学资源认知的初步调查。
医师助理(PA)学生需要循证医学(EBM)指导。本初步研究调查了三个地理位置不同的教学助理课程的教学助理学生,在他们的教学循证医学课程结束时,了解他们认为循证医学资源的哪些属性最有用和最没用,以及他们在搜索和评价医学文献方面的自我效能。主题分析确定了学生报告的资源最重要的属性。基于属性评级,本样本中的PA学生更喜欢UpToDate和PubMed作为他们最喜欢的EBM工具。然而,尽管各机构的使用率很低,但该试点研究中包含的每个数据库都收到了积极的反馈。最重要的属性是易于使用/搜索、信息表达和结论/关键评估技能。在一堂循证医学课程后,平均而言,学生们在搜索文献并评价文献时将他们的自我效能评为“中等自信”。这表明教师和图书管理员有机会让学生接触到更多的工具,并鼓励“用合适的工具做合适的工作”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Reference Services Quarterly
Medical Reference Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: This highly acclaimed, peer-reviewed journal is an essential working tool for medical and health sciences librarians. For those professionals who provide reference and public services to health sciences personnel in clinical, educational, or research settings, Medical Reference Services Quarterly covers topics of current interest and practical value in the areas of reference in medicine and related specialties, the biomedical sciences, nursing, and allied health. This exciting and comprehensive resource regularly publishes brief practice-oriented articles relating to medical reference services, with an emphasis on user education, database searching, and electronic information. Two columns feature the Internet and informatics education.
期刊最新文献
To Weed or to Keep: A Renovation-Driven Weeding Project of the Health Sciences Library Reference Collection with a Focus on the Last Institutional Copies - A Case Study. A Catalyst to Better Searching: Tackling Health Inequities with a Novel Interactive eResource. Assessing the Quality of Biomedical Boolean Search Strings Generated by Prompted and Unprompted Models Using ChatGPT: A Pilot Study. Literature Searches in Medical Informatics Systematic Reviews: Suggested Approaches. Resilience Practices in Health Science and Medical Libraries During the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1