Volume of hippocampal activation as a determining factor for the lateralisation of the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

{"title":"Volume of hippocampal activation as a determining factor for the lateralisation of the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nrleng.2022.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Approximately 30% of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) will develop drug resistance, which requires early surgical treatment. The success of the surgical procedure largely depends on the correct lateralisation of the epileptogenic zone, which can only be determined in 70% of patients with such conventional diagnostic tools as video electroencephalography and volumetric structural magnetic resonance imaging. We evaluated the performance of a memory functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm in lateralising the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant MTLE.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included 18 patients with MTLE attended at the Instituto Neurológico Colombiano in Medellin (Colombia) between 2018 and 2019. The volume of functional activation in both temporal lobes was determined with a memory fMRI paradigm. A concordance analysis was performed to compare the performance of fMRI against that of conventional tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In patients with left MTLE, lower total activation was found in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the epileptogenic zone as compared to the contralateral hemisphere (121.15 ± 16.48 voxels vs 170.23 ± 17.8 voxels [<em>P</em> &lt; .001]), showing substantial concordance with conventional tests. Patients with right MTLE displayed lower hippocampal activation ipsilateral to the epileptogenic zone (18.5 ± 3.38 voxels vs 27.8 ± 3.77 voxels in the contralateral hippocampus [<em>P</em> = .048]), showing moderate concordance with conventional tests.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings suggest that lower functional activation as determined by a memory fMRI paradigm has a high level of concordance with conventional tests for lateralising the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant MTLE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94155,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"39 7","pages":"Pages 584-591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580822001754/pdfft?md5=d003c84ef8e34690847de920050a2682&pid=1-s2.0-S2173580822001754-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580822001754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Approximately 30% of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) will develop drug resistance, which requires early surgical treatment. The success of the surgical procedure largely depends on the correct lateralisation of the epileptogenic zone, which can only be determined in 70% of patients with such conventional diagnostic tools as video electroencephalography and volumetric structural magnetic resonance imaging. We evaluated the performance of a memory functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm in lateralising the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant MTLE.

Methods

We included 18 patients with MTLE attended at the Instituto Neurológico Colombiano in Medellin (Colombia) between 2018 and 2019. The volume of functional activation in both temporal lobes was determined with a memory fMRI paradigm. A concordance analysis was performed to compare the performance of fMRI against that of conventional tests.

Results

In patients with left MTLE, lower total activation was found in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the epileptogenic zone as compared to the contralateral hemisphere (121.15 ± 16.48 voxels vs 170.23 ± 17.8 voxels [P < .001]), showing substantial concordance with conventional tests. Patients with right MTLE displayed lower hippocampal activation ipsilateral to the epileptogenic zone (18.5 ± 3.38 voxels vs 27.8 ± 3.77 voxels in the contralateral hippocampus [P = .048]), showing moderate concordance with conventional tests.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that lower functional activation as determined by a memory fMRI paradigm has a high level of concordance with conventional tests for lateralising the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant MTLE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海马体激活量是耐药性颞叶中段癫痫患者致痫区偏向一侧的决定性因素。
简介大约 30% 的颞叶中叶癫痫(MTLE)患者会产生耐药性,这就需要尽早进行手术治疗。手术治疗的成功在很大程度上取决于致痫区的正确侧位,而70%的患者只能通过视频脑电图和容积结构磁共振成像等传统诊断工具确定致痫区的侧位。我们评估了记忆功能磁共振成像(fMRI)范式在确定耐药 MTLE 患者致痫区侧位方面的性能:我们纳入了2018年至2019年期间在麦德林(哥伦比亚)哥伦比亚神经科学研究所就诊的18名MTLE患者。通过记忆 fMRI 范式确定了两个颞叶的功能激活量。为比较fMRI与传统测试的性能,进行了一致性分析:结果:在左侧MTLE患者中,与对侧半球相比,致痫区同侧半球的总激活量较低(121.15 ± 16.48体素 vs 170.23 ± 17.8体素[P < .001]),与传统测试结果基本一致。右侧MTLE患者在致痫区同侧的海马激活较低(18.5 ± 3.38体素 vs 对侧海马的27.8 ± 3.77体素[P = .048]),与常规测试结果基本一致:这些研究结果表明,通过记忆 fMRI 范式确定的较低功能激活与传统测试在确定耐药 MTLE 患者致痫区侧位方面具有高度一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Frequency and impact of post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic life events in patients with migraine. Headache as main reason for consultation to a hospital Emergency Department in Spain: A prospective study. Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome following adenovirus vector-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19: Epidemiology and clinical presentation in Spain. Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Spain: a systematic review Functional outcomes of patients with NORSE and FIRES treated with immunotherapy: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1