Analysis of the prognostic value of emergency blood tests in ischaemic stroke

{"title":"Analysis of the prognostic value of emergency blood tests in ischaemic stroke","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nrleng.2022.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of emergency blood test results in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We evaluated 592 prospectively patients with neuroimaging-confirmed ischaemic stroke admitted to our stroke unit between 2015 and 2018. We gathered emergency blood test results and calculated the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (neutrophils × 1.000/platelets). The association between blood test results and functional prognosis (as measured with the modified Rankin Scale) and such complications as haemorrhagic transformation was evaluated by logistic regression analysis. The additional predictive value of blood test parameters was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves and the net reclassification index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>An neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 3 at admission was associated with a two-fold increase in the risk of functional dependence at 3 months (OR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.35-3.71) and haemorrhagic transformation (OR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.09-4.05), while an neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 3.86 resulted in an increase of 2.4 times in the risk of mortality at 3 months (OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.37-4.26) after adjusting for the traditional predictors of poor outcomes. Patients with neutrophil-to-platelet ratio ≥ 32 presented 3 times more risk of haemorrhagic transformation (OR: 3.17; 95% CI: 1.70-5.92) and mortality at 3 months (OR: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.69-5.57). Adding these laboratory parameters to standard clinical-radiological models significantly improved discrimination and prognostic accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Basic blood test parameters provide important prognostic information for stroke patients and should therefore be analysed in combination with standard clinical and radiological parameters to optimise ischaemic stroke management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94155,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"39 8","pages":"Pages 617-628"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580822001766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of emergency blood test results in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

Methods

We evaluated 592 prospectively patients with neuroimaging-confirmed ischaemic stroke admitted to our stroke unit between 2015 and 2018. We gathered emergency blood test results and calculated the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (neutrophils × 1.000/platelets). The association between blood test results and functional prognosis (as measured with the modified Rankin Scale) and such complications as haemorrhagic transformation was evaluated by logistic regression analysis. The additional predictive value of blood test parameters was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves and the net reclassification index.

Results

An neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 3 at admission was associated with a two-fold increase in the risk of functional dependence at 3 months (OR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.35-3.71) and haemorrhagic transformation (OR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.09-4.05), while an neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 3.86 resulted in an increase of 2.4 times in the risk of mortality at 3 months (OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.37-4.26) after adjusting for the traditional predictors of poor outcomes. Patients with neutrophil-to-platelet ratio ≥ 32 presented 3 times more risk of haemorrhagic transformation (OR: 3.17; 95% CI: 1.70-5.92) and mortality at 3 months (OR: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.69-5.57). Adding these laboratory parameters to standard clinical-radiological models significantly improved discrimination and prognostic accuracy.

Conclusions

Basic blood test parameters provide important prognostic information for stroke patients and should therefore be analysed in combination with standard clinical and radiological parameters to optimise ischaemic stroke management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缺血性脑卒中急诊血液化验的预后价值分析。
研究目的本研究旨在评估急性缺血性脑卒中患者急诊血液检测结果的预后价值:我们对 2015 年至 2018 年期间本院卒中科收治的 592 例神经影像学确诊缺血性卒中患者进行了前瞻性评估。我们收集了急诊血液检验结果,并计算了中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率和中性粒细胞与血小板比率(中性粒细胞 × 1.000/血小板)。我们通过逻辑回归分析评估了血液检测结果与功能性预后(用改良兰金量表衡量)和出血转化等并发症之间的关系。利用接收者操作特征曲线和净重分类指数评估了血液检测参数的额外预测价值:结果:入院时中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值≥3 与 3 个月后功能依赖(OR:2.24;95% CI:1.35-3.71)和出血转化(OR:2.11;95% CI:1.09-4.05),而中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值≥ 3.86 会导致 3 个月后的死亡风险增加 2.4 倍(OR:2.41;95% CI:1.37-4.26)。中性粒细胞与血小板比值≥32的患者发生出血转化(OR:3.17;95% CI:1.70-5.92)和3个月后死亡(OR:3.07;95% CI:1.69-5.57)的风险增加了3倍。将这些实验室参数添加到标准临床放射学模型中,可显著提高辨别能力和预后准确性:基本血液检验参数可为卒中患者提供重要的预后信息,因此应结合标准临床和放射学参数进行分析,以优化缺血性卒中的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Frequency and impact of post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic life events in patients with migraine. Headache as main reason for consultation to a hospital Emergency Department in Spain: A prospective study. Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome following adenovirus vector-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19: Epidemiology and clinical presentation in Spain. Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Spain: a systematic review Functional outcomes of patients with NORSE and FIRES treated with immunotherapy: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1