Primary mental healthcare for adults with mild intellectual disabilities: a Dutch database study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2022.2142936
Katrien P M Pouls, Monique C J Koks-Leensen, Willem J J Assendelft, Mathilde Mastebroek, Geraline L Leusink
{"title":"Primary mental healthcare for adults with mild intellectual disabilities: a Dutch database study.","authors":"Katrien P M Pouls, Monique C J Koks-Leensen, Willem J J Assendelft, Mathilde Mastebroek, Geraline L Leusink","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2022.2142936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly confronted with people with both mild intellectual disability (MID) and mental health (MH) problems. Little is known about the type of MH problems for which people with MID visit their GP and the care provided.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the type and prevalence of MH disorders and MH-related complaints in people with MID in primary care and care provided, compared to people without ID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By linking the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research's primary care databases, comprising electronic health records, with Statistic Netherlands' social services and chronic care databases, we identified 11,887 people with MID. In this four-year retrospective study, MH-related International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) codes and care characteristics were compared between people with MID and without ID.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the people with MID, 48.8% had MH problems recorded vs. 30.4% of the people without ID, with significant differences in substance abuse, suicide attempts, and psychosis. Of the MID group, 80.3% were not registered by their GP with the ICPC code mental retardation. GPs provided more care to people with MID and MH problems than people without ID but with MH-problems regarding consultations (median 6.4 vs. 4.0 per year) and variety of prescribed medications (median 2.7 vs. 2.0 per year).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In primary care, the prevalence of MH problems and care provided is high in people with MID. To improve primary mental healthcare for this group, it is essential to increase GPs' awareness and knowledge on the combination of MID and MH.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2022.2142936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly confronted with people with both mild intellectual disability (MID) and mental health (MH) problems. Little is known about the type of MH problems for which people with MID visit their GP and the care provided.

Objectives: To identify the type and prevalence of MH disorders and MH-related complaints in people with MID in primary care and care provided, compared to people without ID.

Methods: By linking the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research's primary care databases, comprising electronic health records, with Statistic Netherlands' social services and chronic care databases, we identified 11,887 people with MID. In this four-year retrospective study, MH-related International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) codes and care characteristics were compared between people with MID and without ID.

Results: Of the people with MID, 48.8% had MH problems recorded vs. 30.4% of the people without ID, with significant differences in substance abuse, suicide attempts, and psychosis. Of the MID group, 80.3% were not registered by their GP with the ICPC code mental retardation. GPs provided more care to people with MID and MH problems than people without ID but with MH-problems regarding consultations (median 6.4 vs. 4.0 per year) and variety of prescribed medications (median 2.7 vs. 2.0 per year).

Conclusion: In primary care, the prevalence of MH problems and care provided is high in people with MID. To improve primary mental healthcare for this group, it is essential to increase GPs' awareness and knowledge on the combination of MID and MH.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度智障成人的初级精神保健:荷兰数据库研究。
背景:全科医生(GPs)越来越多地面对同时患有轻度智障(MID)和精神健康(MH)问题的患者。人们对轻度智障者因何种精神健康问题到全科医生处就诊以及所提供的护理知之甚少:目的:与非智障人士相比,确定初级医疗机构中智障人士的精神障碍和精神健康相关投诉的类型和发生率,以及所提供的医疗服务:通过将荷兰卫生服务研究所的初级医疗数据库(包括电子健康记录)与荷兰统计局的社会服务和慢性病护理数据库联系起来,我们确定了11887名MID患者。在这项为期四年的回顾性研究中,我们比较了 MID 患者和非 ID 患者之间与 MH 相关的国际初级保健分类(ICPC)代码和护理特征:在 MID 患者中,48.8% 有精神健康问题记录,而在无 ID 患者中,这一比例为 30.4%,两者在药物滥用、自杀未遂和精神病方面存在显著差异。在 MID 群体中,80.3% 的全科医生没有在 ICPC 代码中登记精神发育迟滞。与没有智障但有精神健康问题的人相比,全科医生为有精神发育障碍和精神健康问题的人提供了更多的咨询(中位数为每年6.4次对4.0次)和处方药种类(中位数为每年2.7种对2.0种):结论:在初级医疗中,MID 患者的精神健康问题发生率和所提供的医疗服务都很高。为了改善对这一群体的初级精神保健,必须提高全科医生对 MID 和精神健康问题的认识和了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
期刊最新文献
Democratising the design and delivery of large-scale randomised, controlled clinical trials in primary care: A personal view. Diagnostic flow for all patients referred with non-specific symptoms of cancer to a diagnostic centre in Denmark: A descriptive study. Monitoring COVID-19 in Belgian general practice: A tool for syndromic surveillance based on electronic health records. Evaluation of the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the patient reported experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC)-Compact questionnaire. The experiences of transgender and nonbinary adults in primary care: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1